Long term changes to auditory sensitivity following blast trauma in mice.

Kali Burke, Senthilvelan Manohar, Micheal L Dent
Author Information
  1. Kali Burke: Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
  2. Senthilvelan Manohar: Center for Hearing and Deafness and Department of Communication Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
  3. Micheal L Dent: Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America. Electronic address: mdent@buffalo.edu.

Abstract

Blast trauma is a common acoustic/physical insult occurring in modern warfare. Twenty percent of active duty military come into close proximity to explosions and experience mild to severe sensory deficits. The prevalence of such injuries is high but correlating auditory sensitivity changes with the initial insult is difficult because injury and evaluations are often separated by long time periods. Here, auditory sensitivity was measured before and after a traumatic blast in adult CBA/CaJ mice using auditory brainstem responses, distortion production otoacoustic emissions, and behavioral detection of pure tones. These measurements included baseline auditory sensitivity prior to injury in all mice, and again at 3, 30, and 90 days after the blast in the two physiological groups, and daily for up to 90 days in the behavioral group. Mice in all groups experienced an initial deterioration in auditory sensitivity, though physiological measurements showed evidence of recovery that behavioral measurements did not. Amplitudes and latencies of ABR waves may reflect additional changes beyond the peripheral damage shown by the threshold changes and should be explored further. The present work addresses a major gap in the current acoustic trauma literature both in terms of comparing physiological and behavioral methods, as well as measuring the time course of recovery.

Keywords

References

  1. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 May;129(5):3090-103 [PMID: 21568412]
  2. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(7):921-8 [PMID: 18075949]
  3. Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 22;6:39009 [PMID: 28005070]
  4. Brain Res. 2006 May 26;1091(1):16-26 [PMID: 16516865]
  5. Hear Res. 2010 Oct 1;269(1-2):180-5 [PMID: 20600743]
  6. Hear Res. 2016 Nov;341:119-129 [PMID: 27579993]
  7. J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 11;29(45):14077-85 [PMID: 19906956]
  8. Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;89(9):980-92 [PMID: 19628578]
  9. J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Mar 15;242:82-92 [PMID: 25597910]
  10. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:1854-1857 [PMID: 28268687]
  11. Neuropsychol Rev. 2012 Mar;22(1):4-20 [PMID: 22350691]
  12. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):14-23 [PMID: 19158592]
  13. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2006 Feb;Chapter 8:Unit8.21A [PMID: 18428644]
  14. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(6):797-810 [PMID: 20104403]
  15. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 31;352(13):1335-42 [PMID: 15800229]
  16. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(7):995-1004 [PMID: 23341275]
  17. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Jan;147(1):337 [PMID: 32006990]
  18. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Sep;140(3):1481 [PMID: 27914389]
  19. J Neurosci Res. 2020 Sep;98(9):1731-1744 [PMID: 31304616]
  20. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Apr;135(4):1941-9 [PMID: 25234992]
  21. Neurobiol Aging. 2020 Dec;96:87-103 [PMID: 32950782]
  22. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009 Oct;195(10):961-9 [PMID: 19756650]
  23. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):398-402 [PMID: 16983225]
  24. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 09;9(1):e85405 [PMID: 24416405]
  25. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;11(4):605-23 [PMID: 20706857]
  26. Mil Med. 2020 Jan 7;185(Suppl 1):248-255 [PMID: 32074377]

Grants

  1. R01 DC016641/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Auditory Threshold
Blast Injuries
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced
Mice
Mice, Inbred CBA
Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0auditorysensitivitychangesbehavioraltraumablastmicemeasurementsphysiologicalinsultinitialinjurytime90daysgroupsrecoveryABRBlastcommonacoustic/physicaloccurringmodernwarfareTwentypercentactivedutymilitarycomecloseproximityexplosionsexperiencemildseveresensorydeficitsprevalenceinjurieshighcorrelatingdifficultevaluationsoftenseparatedlongperiodsmeasuredtraumaticadultCBA/CaJusingbrainstemresponsesdistortionproductionotoacousticemissionsdetectionpuretonesincludedbaselineprior330twodailygroupMiceexperienceddeteriorationthoughshowedevidenceAmplitudeslatencieswavesmayreflectadditionalbeyondperipheraldamageshownthresholdexploredpresentworkaddressesmajorgapcurrentacousticliteraturetermscomparingmethodswellmeasuringcourseLongtermfollowingDPOAEOperantconditioningPsychoacousticsTBI

Similar Articles

Cited By