Groups and Individuals: Optical Flow Patterns of Broiler Chicken Flocks Are Correlated with the Behavior of Individual Birds.

Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich, Ariane Stratmann, Marian Stamp Dawkins
Author Information
  1. Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich: Center for Proper Housing of Poultry and Rabbits, Division of Animal Welfare, University of Bern, Burgerweg 22, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland. ORCID
  2. Ariane Stratmann: Center for Proper Housing of Poultry and Rabbits, Division of Animal Welfare, University of Bern, Burgerweg 22, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland.
  3. Marian Stamp Dawkins: Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, John Krebs Field Station, Wytham, Oxford OX2 8QJ, UK. ORCID

Abstract

Group level measures of welfare flocks have been criticized on the grounds that they give only average measures and overlook the welfare of individual animals. However, we here show that the group-level optical flow patterns made by broiler flocks can be used to deliver information not just about the flock averages but also about the proportion of individuals in different movement categories. Mean optical flow provides information about the average movement of the whole flock while the variance, skew and kurtosis quantify the variation between individuals. We correlated flock optical flow patterns with the behavior and welfare of a sample of 16 birds per flock in two runway tests and a water (latency-to-lie) test. In the runway tests, there was a positive correlation between the average time taken to complete the runway and the skew and kurtosis of optical flow on day 28 of flock life (on average slow individuals came from flocks with a high skew and kurtosis). In the water test, there was a positive correlation between the average length of time the birds remained standing and the mean and variance of flock optical flow (on average, the most mobile individuals came from flocks with the highest mean). Patterns at the flock level thus contain valuable information about the activity of different proportions of the individuals within a flock.

Keywords

References

  1. Vet Rec. 2017 May 20;180(20):499 [PMID: 28242781]
  2. Vet Rec. 1999 Jun 12;144(24):668-71 [PMID: 10404606]
  3. Animal. 2019 Oct;13(10):2365-2372 [PMID: 30894238]
  4. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 6;15(4):e0231006 [PMID: 32251460]
  5. J R Soc Interface. 2012 Dec 7;9(77):3436-43 [PMID: 22951342]
  6. Animals (Basel). 2016 Oct 11;6(10): [PMID: 27727169]
  7. Anim Front. 2020 Jan 10;10(1):51-57 [PMID: 32002203]
  8. Animal. 2019 Dec;13(12):3009-3017 [PMID: 31516101]
  9. Poult Sci. 2007 Oct;86(10):2117-25 [PMID: 17878440]
  10. Animal. 2020 Mar;14(3):617-625 [PMID: 31566170]
  11. Br Poult Sci. 1988 Jun;29(2):273-83 [PMID: 3409074]
  12. Vet Rec. 2002 Dec 21-28;151(25):762-4 [PMID: 12521248]
  13. Behav Processes. 2004 Sep 30;67(2):121-30 [PMID: 15240050]

Grants

  1. 2.16.03/Bundesamt für Lebensmittelsicherheit und Veterinärwesen
  2. BB/N023803/1/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0flockaverageopticalflowwelfareindividualsflocksinformationskewkurtosisrunwaylevelmeasurespatternsbroilerdifferentmovementvariancebehaviorbirdstestswaterlatency-to-lietestpositivecorrelationtimecamemeanPatternsGroupcriticizedgroundsgiveoverlookindividualanimalsHowevershowgroup-levelmadecanuseddeliverjustaveragesalsoproportioncategoriesMeanprovideswholequantifyvariationcorrelatedsample16pertwotakencompleteday28lifeslowhighlengthremainedstandingmobilehighestthuscontainvaluableactivityproportionswithinGroupsIndividuals:OpticalFlowBroilerChickenFlocksCorrelatedBehaviorIndividualBirdsanimalchickensgroupprecisionlivestockfarming

Similar Articles

Cited By