In vitro and in vivo Effect of Antimicrobial Agent Combinations Against Carbapenem-Resistant with Different Resistance Mechanisms in China.

Enbo Liu, Peiyao Jia, Xue Li, Menglan Zhou, Timothy Kudinha, Chuncai Wu, Yingchun Xu, Qiwen Yang
Author Information
  1. Enbo Liu: Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
  2. Peiyao Jia: Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
  3. Xue Li: Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
  4. Menglan Zhou: Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  5. Timothy Kudinha: School of Biomedical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Orange, 2800, Australia. ORCID
  6. Chuncai Wu: Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
  7. Yingchun Xu: Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
  8. Qiwen Yang: Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo effects of different combinations of antimicrobial agents against carbapenemase-producing and non-producing from China.
METHODS: A checkerboard assay of meropenem (MEM), amikacin (AK), tigecycline (TGC), colistin (COL) and their combinations was carried out against 58 clinical carbapenem-resistant (CRKp) isolates, including 11 carbapenemase-non-producing isolates and 21 isolates producing KPC-2 enzyme, 11 NDM-1, 13 IMP, one VIM-1 and one OXA-48. The checkerboard assay was analyzed by the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). A time-kill assay and infection model were conducted to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo effects of the four drugs alone and in combination.
RESULTS: In the checkerboard assay, TGC+AK and MEM+AK combinations showed the highest synergistic effect against KPC-2 and NDM-1 carbapenemase-producing isolates, with synergy+partial synergy (defined as FICI <1) rates of 76.2% and 71.4% against KPC-2 producers, and 54.5% and 81.8% against NDM-1 producers. TGC+AK and MEM+COL combinations showed the highest rate of synergistic effect against IMP-producing isolates. Against carbapenemase-non-producing isolates, TGC+COL and TGC+AK combinations showed the highest rate of synergy effect (63.6% and 54.5%). MEM+AK showed a synergistic effect against one VIM-1 producer (FICI=0.31) and an additivite effect (FICI=1) against one OXA-48 producer. In the time-kill assay, COL+AK, COL+TGC, COL+MEM and AK+TGC showed good synergistic effects against the KPC-2-producing isolate D16. COL+MEM and COL+TGC combinations showed good effects against the NDM-1-producing isolate L13 and IMP-4-producing isolate L34. Against the carbapenemase-non-producing isolate Y105, MEM+TGC and COL+AK showed high synergistic effects, with logCFU/mL decreases of 6.2 and 5.5 compared to the most active single drug. In the survival assay, MEM-based combinations had relatively high survival rates, especially when combined with colistin, against KPC-2 producers (90% survival rate) and with amikacin against metallo-beta-lactamase producers (95-100% survival rate).
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that different antimicrobial agent combinations should be considered against CRKp infections with different resistance mechanisms.

Keywords

References

  1. J Fungi (Basel). 2018 Sep 06;4(3): [PMID: 30200639]
  2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(4):2322-8 [PMID: 24514083]
  3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Oct 21;60(11):6774-6779 [PMID: 27600048]
  4. J Med Microbiol. 2013 Dec;62(Pt 12):1790-1798 [PMID: 24000226]
  5. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Oct;55(7):943-50 [PMID: 22752516]
  6. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Feb 1;73(2):431-436 [PMID: 29186402]
  7. Molecules. 2017 Dec 19;22(12): [PMID: 29257114]
  8. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Dec 21;63(1): [PMID: 30348660]
  9. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Jun;56(6):3441-3 [PMID: 22391543]
  10. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Mar 27;62(4): [PMID: 29358293]
  11. J Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 15;215(suppl_1):S28-S36 [PMID: 28375512]
  12. J Appl Microbiol. 2018 Jul;125(1):84-95 [PMID: 29517825]
  13. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Sep;10(9):597-602 [PMID: 20705517]
  14. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Sep;13(9):785-96 [PMID: 23969216]
  15. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Jun;8(6):423-35 [PMID: 20440275]
  16. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Jun 18;9(6): [PMID: 32570731]
  17. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018 Oct 18;8:363 [PMID: 30406040]
  18. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2019 Feb 28;13(2):162-164 [PMID: 32036352]
  19. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;17(10):1791-8 [PMID: 22000347]
  20. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):928 [PMID: 31684890]
  21. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Dec;58(6):1221-9 [PMID: 17012300]
  22. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Jul;69(7):1856-65 [PMID: 24648503]
  23. J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jul 26;56(8): [PMID: 29769274]
  24. Virulence. 2017 May 19;8(4):470-484 [PMID: 28276996]
  25. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Nov;44(11):3003-7 [PMID: 11036013]
  26. Microb Drug Resist. 2019 Jul/Aug;25(6):839-845 [PMID: 30835635]
  27. EBioMedicine. 2017 May;19:98-106 [PMID: 28479289]
  28. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Mar;59(3):1466-71 [PMID: 25534730]
  29. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Oct;83(2):183-6 [PMID: 26164275]
  30. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Apr 24;9(4): [PMID: 32344551]
  31. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Mar;57(3):573-6 [PMID: 16431863]
  32. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 May;70(1):119-23 [PMID: 21398074]
  33. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Apr;56(4):2108-13 [PMID: 22252816]
  34. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jun;58(6):3541-6 [PMID: 24687491]
  35. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Dec 1;74(12):3515-3520 [PMID: 31730163]
  36. J Med Microbiol. 2009 Oct;58(Pt 10):1303-1308 [PMID: 19556371]
  37. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Nov;46(5):538-45 [PMID: 26364845]
  38. Infection. 2019 Jun;47(3):497-500 [PMID: 30734249]
  39. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):654-63 [PMID: 24080646]
  40. Clin Ther. 2008 Jan;30(1):143-51 [PMID: 18343250]
  41. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jun;48(6):2271-4 [PMID: 20375234]
  42. J Med Microbiol. 2014 Jul;63(Pt 7):945-955 [PMID: 24928215]
  43. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2): [PMID: 29203488]
  44. Drugs. 2012 Jan 1;72(1):1-16 [PMID: 22191792]
  45. Ann Palliat Med. 2019 Nov;8(5):622-631 [PMID: 31735038]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0combinationsassayshowedisolateseffectssynergisticeffectKPC-2oneproducersrateisolatesurvivalvitrovivodifferentantimicrobialcheckerboardcarbapenemase-non-producingNDM-1TGC+AKhigheststudyevaluatecarbapenemase-producingChinaamikacincolistincarbapenem-resistantCRKp11VIM-1OXA-48FICItime-killinfectionmodelMEM+AKsynergyrates545%producerCOL+AKCOL+TGCCOL+MEMgoodhigh5agentresistancemechanismsOBJECTIVE:aimedagentsnon-producingMETHODS:meropenemMEMAKtigecyclineTGCCOLcarried58clinicalincluding21producingenzyme13IMPanalyzedfractionalinhibitoryconcentrationindexconductedfourdrugsalonecombinationRESULTS:synergy+partialdefined<1762%714%818%MEM+COLIMP-producingTGC+COL636%FICI=031additiviteFICI=1AK+TGCKPC-2-producingD16NDM-1-producingL13IMP-4-producingL34Y105MEM+TGClogCFU/mLdecreases62comparedactivesingledrugMEM-basedrelativelyespeciallycombined90%metallo-beta-lactamase95-100%CONCLUSION:suggestsconsideredinfectionsEffectAntimicrobialAgentCombinationsCarbapenem-ResistantDifferentResistanceMechanismsCRKPGalleriamellonellaKlebsiellapneumoniaetime–killcurve

Similar Articles

Cited By