Nudging: Progress to date and future directions.

John Beshears, Harry Kosowsky
Author Information
  1. John Beshears: Harvard Business School and National Bureau of Economic Research, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163, United States.
  2. Harry Kosowsky: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States.

Abstract

Nudges influence behavior by changing the environment in which decisions are made, without restricting the menu of options and without altering financial incentives. This paper assesses past empirical research on nudging and provides recommendations for future work in this area by discussing examples of successful and unsuccessful nudges and by analyzing 174 articles that estimate nudge treatment effects. Researchers in disciplines spanning the behavioral sciences, using varied data sources, have documented that many different types of nudges succeed in changing behavior in a wide range of domains. Nudges that automate some aspect of the decision-making process have an average effect size, measured by Cohen's , that is 0.193 larger than that of other nudges. Our analyses point to the need for future research to pay greater attention to (1) determining which types of nudges tend to be most impactful; (2) using field and laboratory research approaches as complementary methods; (3) measuring long-run effects of nudges; (4) considering effects of nudges on non-targeted outcomes; and (5) examining interaction effects among nudges and other interventions.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):534-47 [PMID: 23855496]
  2. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2021 Mar;163:6-16 [PMID: 33986563]
  3. J Public Econ. 2017 Jul;151:84-95 [PMID: 28966407]
  4. J Public Econ. 2020 Mar;183: [PMID: 32189814]
  5. J Public Econ. 2014 Aug 1;116:2-16 [PMID: 24954961]
  6. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:289-314 [PMID: 26361052]
  7. Prev Med. 2013 Jan;56(1):92-3 [PMID: 23123859]
  8. J Econ Behav Organ. 2013 Nov 1;95:130-145 [PMID: 24443619]
  9. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:591-621 [PMID: 14744228]
  10. Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 11;10:813 [PMID: 31031679]
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108(26):10415-20 [PMID: 21670283]
  12. Am Econ Rev. 2015 May;105(5):420-425 [PMID: 26190855]
  13. Psychol Sci. 2004 May;15(5):337-41 [PMID: 15102144]
  14. Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1663-1674 [PMID: 28961062]
  15. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2021 Nov;167:72-87 [PMID: 34366557]
  16. Rev Financ Stud. 2017 Jun;30(6):1971-2005 [PMID: 28553012]
  17. J Econ Behav Organ. 2011 Mar 1;77(3):304-317 [PMID: 21516220]
  18. Med Care. 2016 Jun;54(6):578-83 [PMID: 27177295]
  19. Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1041-1055 [PMID: 28581899]
  20. J Public Econ. 2008 Aug;92(8-9):1787-1794 [PMID: 24761048]
  21. Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):414-20 [PMID: 16683929]
  22. Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31 [PMID: 17835457]
  23. Manage Sci. 2021 Jul;67(7):3985-4642 [PMID: 35001975]
  24. J Finance. 2015 Jun 1;70(3):1161-120 [PMID: 26045629]
  25. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8 [PMID: 7455683]

Grants

  1. P30 AG034532/NIA NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nudgeseffectsresearchfutureNudgesbehaviorchangingwithoutusingtypesBehavioralinfluenceenvironmentdecisionsmaderestrictingmenuoptionsalteringfinancialincentivespaperassessespastempiricalnudgingprovidesrecommendationsworkareadiscussingexamplessuccessfulunsuccessfulanalyzing174articlesestimatenudgetreatmentResearchersdisciplinesspanningbehavioralsciencesvarieddatasourcesdocumentedmanydifferentsucceedwiderangedomainsautomateaspectdecision-makingprocessaverageeffectsizemeasuredCohen's0193largeranalysespointneedpaygreaterattention1determiningtendimpactful2fieldlaboratoryapproachescomplementarymethods3measuringlong-run4consideringnon-targetedoutcomes5examininginteractionamonginterventionsNudging:ProgressdatedirectionseconomicsscienceChoicearchitectureNudge

Similar Articles

Cited By