Paramedic student encounters with patients during clinical placements: A multi-institutional cohort study.

David Page, Tom Brazelton, Gordon Kokx, Paul A Jennings, Brett Williams
Author Information
  1. David Page: Prehospital Care Research Forum University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.
  2. Tom Brazelton: School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.
  3. Gordon Kokx: Committee on Accreditation of Educational Programs for the EMS Professions Rowlett Texas USA.
  4. Paul A Jennings: Department of Paramedicine Monash University Melbourne Australia.
  5. Brett Williams: Department of Paramedicine Monash University Melbourne Australia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Paramedic students in the US are required to complete clinical placements to gain supervised experience with real patient encounters. Given wide variation in clinical placement practices, an evidence-based approach is needed to guide programs in setting realistic and attainable goals for students. This study's goal was to describe patient encounters and hours logged by paramedic students during clinical placements.
METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected quality assurance data entered by US paramedic students between 2010 and 2014 was conducted. De-identified electronic records entered in the Field Internship Student Data Acquisition Project (FISDAP) Skill Tracker database were included from consenting paramedic students whose records were audited and approved by instructors. Descriptive statistics were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 10,645 students encountered 2,239,027 patients; most encounters occurred in hospital settings (n = 1,311,967, 59%). The median total number of patient encounters per paramedic student was 206 (142-269) and the median total clinical placement hours per student was 626 (504-752). The median number of team leads per student was 56 (30-84). Students encountered a median of 22 (12-31) pediatric patients, ages 0-12 years, and 181 (126-238) adolescent or adult patients. For pediatric patient encounters, the most common clinical impressions were respiratory distress, other medical complaints, and extremity trauma. Among adult patient encounters, the most common clinical impressions included other medical, trauma, and cardiac conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: US paramedic students experienced a variable range of patient encounter types and volumes. The findings of this study offer an evidence base from which programs can set realistic and attainable clinical placement requirements.

Keywords

References

  1. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Oct;25(4):913-987 [PMID: 31797195]
  2. Emerg Med J. 2015 Jan;32(1):70-5 [PMID: 24078197]
  3. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Feb;31(1):64-73 [PMID: 26618748]
  4. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Mar 28;22:22 [PMID: 24678868]
  5. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Apr;27(4):333-41; quiz 342-4 [PMID: 21467889]
  6. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Dec;31(S1):S112-S117 [PMID: 27884215]
  7. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Jan-Mar;17(1):57-67 [PMID: 22834959]
  8. BMC Med Educ. 2009 May 18;9:23 [PMID: 19445726]
  9. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):379-85 [PMID: 23410104]
  10. Emerg Med J. 2009 May;26(5):377-81 [PMID: 19386881]
  11. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996 Jul-Sep;11(3):180-7 [PMID: 10163380]
  12. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1997 Oct-Dec;12(4):250-7 [PMID: 10179202]
  13. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):103-8 [PMID: 19947874]
  14. BMC Emerg Med. 2019 May 6;19(1):32 [PMID: 31060513]
  15. Anaesthesia. 1991 Jul;46(7):578-9 [PMID: 1862902]
  16. BMC Med Educ. 2008 Apr 10;8:19 [PMID: 18400111]
  17. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1295-303 [PMID: 18976342]
  18. Birth. 2009 Mar;36(1):43-50 [PMID: 19278382]
  19. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Aug;31(4):386-91 [PMID: 27217077]
  20. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008 Apr-Jun;12(2):212-6 [PMID: 18379919]
  21. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Apr-Jun;9(2):156-62 [PMID: 16036839]
  22. Resuscitation. 2007 Jun;73(3):425-9 [PMID: 17292524]
  23. BMC Med Educ. 2015 Oct 05;15:168 [PMID: 26438130]
  24. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Nov;35(11):1080-4 [PMID: 26091861]
  25. J Interprof Care. 2016;30(1):97-102 [PMID: 26833109]
  26. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007 Oct-Dec;11(4):448-52 [PMID: 17907031]
  27. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):540-547 [PMID: 30429734]
  28. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Mar 02;2(2):e12391 [PMID: 33718925]
  29. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):116-22 [PMID: 23961742]
  30. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jul 08;14:138 [PMID: 25004792]
  31. JAMA. 2002 Jan 9;287(2):226-35 [PMID: 11779266]
  32. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 Jul-Sep;19(3):432-40 [PMID: 25664774]
  33. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Oct;35(10):1037-43 [PMID: 26025582]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0clinicalstudentsencounterspatientparamedicpatientsmedianstudentUSplacementtotalpermedicalParamedicplacementsprogramsrealisticattainablehoursretrospectiveenteredrecordsincludedencounterednumberpediatricadultcommonimpressionstraumastudyOBJECTIVE:requiredcompletegainsupervisedexperiencerealGivenwidevariationpracticesevidence-basedapproachneededguidesettinggoalsstudy'sgoaldescribeloggedMETHODS:reviewprospectivelycollectedqualityassurancedata20102014conductedDe-identifiedelectronicFieldInternshipStudentDataAcquisitionProjectFISDAPSkillTrackerdatabaseconsentingwhoseauditedapprovedinstructorsDescriptivestatisticscalculatedRESULTS:106452239027occurredhospitalsettingsn=131196759%206142-269626504-752teamleads5630-84Students2212-31ages0-12years181126-238adolescentrespiratorydistresscomplaintsextremityAmongcardiacconditionsCONCLUSIONS:experiencedvariablerangeencountertypesvolumesfindingsofferevidencebasecansetrequirementsplacements:multi-institutionalcohorteducationalmeasurementemergencytechniciansinternshipprogramevaluationresidencystudies

Similar Articles

Cited By