Comparative effectiveness of exercise training program in patients with heart failure: protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and network meta-analysis.

Min Gao, Yangxi Huang, Qianyi Wang, Zejuan Gu, Guozhen Sun
Author Information
  1. Min Gao: School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. ORCID
  2. Yangxi Huang: School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  3. Qianyi Wang: Department of Nursing, Jiangyin People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China.
  4. Zejuan Gu: Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China gzsun100@126.com jassicagu@163.com.
  5. Guozhen Sun: School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China gzsun100@126.com jassicagu@163.com.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) is an end-stage of numerous heart diseases including hypertension, coronary heart disease and arrhythmia, in which the heart is unable to perform its circulatory function with sufficient efficiency due to structural or functional dysfunction (systolic or diastolic alterations). Strategies such as exercise rehabilitation may improve cardiac function, exercise capacity and health-related quality of life and reduce anxiety and depression in patients with HF. However, the relative effectiveness as well as the hierarchy of exercise interventions have not been well established, although various exercise options are available. Therefore, this protocol proposes to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) aiming to compare the effectiveness of different types of exercise training in patients with HF.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to March 2021 for relevant randomised controlled trials. Other resources, such as Google Scholar and Clinical Trials.gov will also be considered. Studies assessing exercise rehabilitation in patients with HF will be selected. Two independent reviewers will identify eligible trials. The PEDro risk of bias assessment tool will be used to assess the quality of the included studies. Bayesian NMA will be used when possible to determine the comparative effectiveness of the different exercise interventions. The mean ranks and surface will estimate the ranking probabilities for the optimal intervention of various treatments under the cumulative ranking curve. Subgroup, sensitivity and meta-regression will be conducted to explain the included studies' heterogeneity if possible. We will also use the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to assess the strength of evidence.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review and NMA will synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of the different exercises in patients with HF. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. No ethical approval will be required because the data used for the review will be exclusively extracted from published studies.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020165870.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jun 15;261:134-141 [PMID: 29572084]
  2. Korean Circ J. 2017 Sep;47(5):555-643 [PMID: 28955381]
  3. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2017 May 1;10(3):121-128 [PMID: 28541588]
  4. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200 [PMID: 27206819]
  5. Lancet. 2015 Feb 28;385(9970):812-24 [PMID: 25467564]
  6. Res Synth Methods. 2012 Jun;3(2):80-97 [PMID: 26062083]
  7. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Jan;25(1):9-18 [PMID: 28782380]
  8. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec;99(12):2570-2582 [PMID: 29698639]
  9. Congenit Heart Dis. 2018 Mar;13(2):194-202 [PMID: 29423938]
  10. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Oct 20;66(16):1747-1761 [PMID: 26483097]
  11. JACC Heart Fail. 2013 Feb;1(1):31-9 [PMID: 24621797]
  12. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1999 Dec;31(4):223-8 [PMID: 10599899]
  13. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016 May-Jun;36(3):157-66 [PMID: 26784735]
  14. Heart Lung. 2004 May-Jun;33(3):154-61 [PMID: 15136775]
  15. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Feb 15;171(3):368-76 [PMID: 24398230]
  16. Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;293:165-175 [PMID: 31345646]
  17. Circulation. 2015 Jan 6;131(1):34-42 [PMID: 25406305]
  18. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019 May;35(3):244-283 [PMID: 31249457]
  19. Clin Sci (Lond). 2002 Jan;102(1):1-7 [PMID: 11749654]
  20. BMJ. 2005 Oct 15;331(7521):897-900 [PMID: 16223826]
  21. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;64(2):163-71 [PMID: 20688472]
  22. Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Jun;17(3):279-301 [PMID: 17925316]
  23. Coron Artery Dis. 1998;9(11):765-70 [PMID: 9919425]
  24. Stat Med. 2004 Oct 30;23(20):3105-24 [PMID: 15449338]
  25. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Jun;27(9):929-952 [PMID: 31177833]
  26. Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1 [PMID: 25554246]
  27. Lancet. 2017 Oct 28;390(10106):1981-1995 [PMID: 28460827]
  28. JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Aug;7(8):706-708 [PMID: 31302048]
  29. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Oct;2(4):755-63 [PMID: 6350401]
  30. Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Oct;27(10):1123-1208 [PMID: 30077227]
  31. BMJ. 2014 Sep 24;349:g5630 [PMID: 25252733]
  32. JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Aug;7(8):691-705 [PMID: 31302050]
  33. ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;5(2):222-232 [PMID: 29235244]
  34. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1000:31-49 [PMID: 29098614]
  35. Res Synth Methods. 2012 Jun;3(2):98-110 [PMID: 26062084]
  36. Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):932-44 [PMID: 20213715]
  37. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Nov;32(11):1482-1492 [PMID: 29984598]
  38. Circulation. 1999 Mar 9;99(9):1173-82 [PMID: 10069785]
  39. Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(1):43-9 [PMID: 11869164]
  40. Chest. 1996 Oct;110(4):985-91 [PMID: 8874256]
  41. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011 Feb;18(1):5-14 [PMID: 20473181]
  42. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;53(11):1119-29 [PMID: 11106885]
  43. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Nov;103(5):433-439 [PMID: 25317861]
  44. Cardiology. 2017;136(2):79-89 [PMID: 27577715]
  45. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(17):e15344 [PMID: 31027110]
  46. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]

MeSH Term

Bayes Theorem
Exercise
Heart Failure
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Network Meta-Analysis
Quality of Life
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Systematic Reviews as Topic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0willexerciseHFheartpatientseffectivenessrehabilitationNMAdifferenttrialsusedreviewfailurefunctionqualitywellinterventionsvariousprotocolnetworkmeta-analysistrainingANDrandomisedcontrolledalsoassessincludedstudiespossiblerankingevidencesystematicmedicineINTRODUCTION:Heartend-stagenumerousdiseasesincludinghypertensioncoronarydiseasearrhythmiaunableperformcirculatorysufficientefficiencyduestructuralfunctionaldysfunctionsystolicdiastolicalterationsStrategiesmayimprovecardiaccapacityhealth-relatedlifereduceanxietydepressionHoweverrelativehierarchyestablishedalthoughoptionsavailableThereforeproposesconductaimingcomparetypesMETHODSANALYSIS:PubMedEmbaseCochraneLibrarysearchedinceptionMarch2021relevantresourcesGoogleScholarClinicalTrialsgovconsideredStudiesassessingselectedTwoindependentreviewersidentifyeligiblePEDroriskbiasassessmenttoolBayesiandeterminecomparativemeanrankssurfaceestimateprobabilitiesoptimalinterventiontreatmentscumulativecurveSubgroupsensitivitymeta-regressionconductedexplainstudies'heterogeneityuseGradingRecommendationsAssessmentDevelopmentEvaluationsystemstrengthETHICSDISSEMINATION:synthesiseexercisesresultssubmittedpeer-reviewedjournalethicalapprovalrequireddataexclusivelyextractedpublishedPROSPEROREGISTRATIONNUMBER:CRD42020165870Comparativeprogramfailure:sports

Similar Articles

Cited By