Analysis of publication speed of anesthesiology journals: a cross-sectional study.

Chitta Ranjan Mohanty, Snigdha Bellapukonda, Manisha Mund, Bikram Kishore Behera, Soumya Swaroop Sahoo
Author Information
  1. Chitta Ranjan Mohanty: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Trauma and Emergency, Bhubaneswar, India.
  2. Snigdha Bellapukonda: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Bhubaneswar, India. Electronic address: drsnigdha5bellapukonda@gmail.com.
  3. Manisha Mund: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Bhubaneswar, India.
  4. Bikram Kishore Behera: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Bhubaneswar, India.
  5. Soumya Swaroop Sahoo: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Bathinda, India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Publication speed is one of the critical factors affecting authors' preference to a journal for manuscript submission. The publication time of submitted manuscripts varies across journals and specialty.
OBJECTIVES: Several bibliometric studies in various fields of medicine, except in anesthesiology, have addressed the issue of publication speed and factors that influence the publication speed. We aimed to identify factors affecting the publication speed of indexed anesthesiology journals.
METHOD: Overall, 25 anesthesiology journals indexed in MEDLINE database were retrospectively analyzed for the time required during different stages of publication process. A total of 12 original articles published in the year 2018 were randomly selected from each journal based on the number of issues. Time periods from submission to acceptance and from submission to publication were noted, and their association with impact factor (IF), advanced online publication (AOP), and article processing charges (APCs) were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median time from submission to acceptance and from submission to publication for the selected journals were 120 (IQR [83-167]) days and 186 (IQR [126-246]) days, respectively. Publication speed was not found to have any correlation with IF and APC. However, journals with AOP required significantly lesser time for publication than those without AOP 138.5 and 240 days, respectively, (p =  0.011). Moreover, the IF of journals with AOP was significantly higher than that of journals without AOP (p =  0.002).
CONCLUSION: The study provides an overview of total time required for peer review, acceptance, and publication in indexed anesthesiology journals. Researchers should focus on journals with AOP for expediting the publication process and avoiding publication delays.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 28;14:251 [PMID: 25429724]
  2. JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2829-31 [PMID: 12038925]
  3. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;37(9):864-7 [PMID: 20092595]
  4. Head Face Med. 2007 Jun 11;3:27 [PMID: 17562003]
  5. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Feb;73(2):383-390 [PMID: 31680026]
  6. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):40-4 [PMID: 26955575]
  7. Ophthalmology. 2013 Aug;120(8):1697-701 [PMID: 23623355]
  8. Acta Inform Med. 2015 Dec;23(6):379-84 [PMID: 26862250]
  9. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jul 31;4(8):e002292 [PMID: 26231845]
  10. Indian Pediatr. 2011 Jan;48(1):67-8 [PMID: 21317472]

MeSH Term

Anesthesiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Periodicals as Topic
Retrospective Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0publicationjournalsspeedAOPsubmissiontimeanesthesiologyfactorsindexedrequiredacceptanceIFdaysPublicationaffectingjournalprocesstotalselectedIQRrespectivelysignificantlywithoutp = 0studyreviewBACKGROUND:onecriticalauthors'preferencemanuscriptsubmittedmanuscriptsvariesacrossspecialtyOBJECTIVES:SeveralbibliometricstudiesvariousfieldsmedicineexceptaddressedissueinfluenceaimedidentifyMETHOD:Overall25MEDLINEdatabaseretrospectivelyanalyzeddifferentstages12originalarticlespublishedyear2018randomlybasednumberissuesTimeperiodsnotedassociationimpactfactoradvancedonlinearticleprocessingchargesAPCsevaluatedRESULTS:median120[83-167]186[126-246]foundcorrelationAPCHoweverlesser1385240011Moreoverhigher002CONCLUSION:providesoverviewpeerResearchersfocusexpeditingavoidingdelaysAnalysisjournals:cross-sectionalAnesthesiologyBibliometricanalysisJournalImpactFactorPeer

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)