How to Conduct Responsible Research: A Guide for Graduate Students.

Alison L Antes, Leonard B Maggi
Author Information
  1. Alison L Antes: Department of Medicine, Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  2. Leonard B Maggi: Department of Medicine, Division of Molecular Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Abstract

Researchers must conduct research responsibly for it to have an impact and to safeguard trust in science. Essential responsibilities of researchers include using rigorous, reproducible research methods, reporting findings in a trustworthy manner, and giving the researchers who contributed appropriate authorship credit. This "how-to" guide covers strategies and practices for doing reproducible research and being a responsible author. The article also covers how to utilize decision-making strategies when uncertain about the best way to proceed in a challenging situation. The advice focuses especially on graduate students, but is appropriate for undergraduates and experienced researchers. It begins with an overview of responsible conduct of research, research misconduct, and ethical behavior in the scientific workplace. The takeaway message is that responsible conduct of research requires a thoughtful approach to doing research in order to ensure trustworthy results and conclusions, and that researchers receive fair credit. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 2000 May 24-31;283(20):2701-11 [PMID: 10819955]
  2. Genetics. 2015 Nov;201(3):811-3 [PMID: 26564899]
  3. Nature. 2016 May 25;533(7604):452-4 [PMID: 27225100]
  4. Curr Protoc. 2021 Mar;1(3):e86 [PMID: 33751862]
  5. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 16;13(1):e0190606 [PMID: 29338019]
  6. Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Jan;5(1):97-117 [PMID: 11658016]
  7. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7733):616-618 [PMID: 30487619]
  8. Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):399-409 [PMID: 20803259]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 21;117(3):1389-1394 [PMID: 31919283]
  10. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):361-391 [PMID: 28321685]
  11. Account Res. 2013;20(5-6):320-38 [PMID: 24028480]
  12. Neuron. 2018 Aug 22;99(4):635-639 [PMID: 30138587]
  13. PLoS Biol. 2015 Mar 13;13(3):e1002106 [PMID: 25768323]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 28;117(17):9284-9291 [PMID: 32291335]
  15. Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):182-5 [PMID: 26450039]
  16. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2019 Jul 17;83(3): [PMID: 31315903]
  17. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jun 1;8(341):341ps12 [PMID: 27252173]
  18. Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):853-60 [PMID: 17726390]
  19. Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7759):5 [PMID: 31160744]
  20. Acad Med. 2018 Apr;93(4):550-555 [PMID: 29068823]
  21. Nature. 2018 May;557(7705):279-280 [PMID: 29769683]
  22. J Acad Ethics. 2021 Jun;19(2):139-156 [PMID: 34177401]
  23. Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7786):210-212 [PMID: 31827288]
  24. Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1:0021 [PMID: 33954258]
  25. PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0214595 [PMID: 31017929]
  26. Nature. 2018 May;557(7705):302-304 [PMID: 29769687]
  27. Science. 2016 Oct 7;354(6308):142 [PMID: 27846503]
  28. Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7713):151 [PMID: 29991794]
  29. Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Mar 6;36(3):282-284 [PMID: 29509732]
  30. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec;13(4):395-414 [PMID: 18038194]
  31. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Dec;2(4):15-34 [PMID: 19385805]
  32. Nature. 2018 May;557(7705):281 [PMID: 29769684]
  33. Account Res. 2019 Apr;26(3):198-226 [PMID: 31033345]
  34. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 24;12(10):e0186472 [PMID: 29065125]
  35. Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5 [PMID: 26113702]

Grants

  1. K01 HG008990/NHGRI NIH HHS
  2. UL1 TR002345/NCATS NIH HHS
  3. K01HG008990/NHGRI NIH HHS
  4. TR002345/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Authorship
Humans
Morals
Research Personnel
Scientific Misconduct
Students