Applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the implementation of the Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences (SENSE) program.

Roberta Pineda, Jessica Roussin, Jenny Kwon, Elizabeth Heiny, Graham Colditz, Joan Smith
Author Information
  1. Roberta Pineda: Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. bobbi.pineda@chan.usc.edu.
  2. Jessica Roussin: Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  3. Jenny Kwon: Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  4. Elizabeth Heiny: Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  5. Graham Colditz: Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  6. Joan Smith: Department of Quality, Safety, and Practice Excellence, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To maximize the benefit of parent-directed, positive sensory exposures in the NICU, a structured sensory-based program titled the Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences (SENSE) program was developed that includes specific doses and targeted timing of evidence-based sensory exposures.
METHODS: The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used to systematically evaluate the SENSE program as an implementation strategy. One-hundred preterm infants ≤32 weeks gestation were studied (61 receiving the SENSE program and 39 standard-of-care). Parent education time and infant sensory exposures were tracked, and parents completed a questionnaire that probed their perceptions about the SENSE program.
RESULTS: One-hundered thirty-one families were recruited, and 100 (76%) enrolled. The SENSE program was initiated at an average postmenstrual age of 29.8 (±2.4) weeks; 4.9 (±5.6) days after birth. The average number of education sessions with families was 4.8 (±3.7) amounting to 72.3 (±37.4) total minutes over hospitalization. The total time of logged tactile and auditory exposures among SENSE recipients over the length of hospitalization was a median (IQ range) of 9325 (5295-15,694) minutes over an average of 10.1 (±7.6) weeks of hospitalization. There were differences in the proportion of tactile and auditory exposure targets received by the infant among those receiving the SENSE program compared to standard-of-care (91% compared to 48%; p < 0.0001). Ninety-five percent of infants tolerated the SENSE program as defined, with 5% of infants requiring intermittent adaptations or the interventions being stopped for a period that typically lasted 1-2 weeks. Earlier parent education was related to more parent participation in SENSE program interventions (p = 0.04). Eighty-five percent of participants receiving the SENSE program had most of the sensory interventions completed by parents, as opposed to the medical or sensory support team. Seventy-two percent of infants had at least 100% of the auditory and tactile doses conducted over the length of stay. Parents reported acceptability.
CONCLUSION: The SENSE program had good reach, was effective and acceptable with minimal cost, was adopted, and had good fidelity. Insights from implementation of the SENSE program (within a research study) informed future strategies to aid maintenance during dissemination.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Feb 07;12:14 [PMID: 22314029]
  2. Early Hum Dev. 2010 Jan;86(1):7-11 [PMID: 20022717]
  3. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Jan;104(1 Suppl 1):s22-30 [PMID: 14702014]
  4. Neonatal Netw. 2015;34(3):165-77 [PMID: 26802392]
  5. J Perinatol. 2017 Apr;37(4):323-332 [PMID: 27763631]
  6. Early Hum Dev. 2018 Feb;117:32-38 [PMID: 29275070]
  7. Early Hum Dev. 2019 Sep;136:27-32 [PMID: 31299550]
  8. Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 10;11:33 [PMID: 27013464]
  9. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Apr-Jun;22(2):133-44; quiz 145-6 [PMID: 18496073]
  10. Clin Ther. 2019 Sep;41(9):1663-1668 [PMID: 31439335]
  11. Infant Behav Dev. 2013 Dec;36(4):694-706 [PMID: 23962543]
  12. Adv Neonatal Care. 2019 Aug;19(4):311-320 [PMID: 30893098]
  13. BMC Res Notes. 2016 Feb 12;9:90 [PMID: 26867928]
  14. Am J Perinatol. 2019 Oct;36(12):1229-1236 [PMID: 30577058]
  15. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7 [PMID: 10474547]
  16. Early Hum Dev. 2019 Jun;133:29-35 [PMID: 31054467]
  17. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76 [PMID: 20957426]
  18. Early Hum Dev. 2020 May;144:105000 [PMID: 32151905]
  19. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jan 1;75(1):56-64 [PMID: 24094511]
  20. J Perinatol. 2013 Aug;33(8):636-41 [PMID: 23412640]

Grants

  1. UL1 TR002345/NCATS NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD057098/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. P30 HD062171/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Gestational Age
Hospitalization
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
Parents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0programSENSEsensoryexposuresinfants4NICUimplementationreceivingeducationaveragehospitalizationtactileauditorypercentinterventionsSupportingEnhancingSensoryExperiencesdosesReachEffectivenessMaintenanceRE-AIMframeworkevaluatestandard-of-careParenttimeinfantparentscompletedfamilies8weeks6totalminutesamonglengthcomparedparentgoodBACKGROUND:maximizebenefitparent-directedpositivestructuredsensory-basedtitleddevelopedincludesspecifictargetedtimingevidence-basedMETHODS:AdoptionImplementationusedsystematicallystrategyOne-hundredpreterm≤32 weeksgestationstudied6139trackedquestionnaireprobedperceptionsRESULTS:One-hunderedthirty-onerecruited10076%enrolledinitiatedpostmenstrualage29±29±5daysbirthnumbersessions±37amounting723±37loggedrecipientsmedianIQrange93255295-15694101±7differencesproportionexposuretargetsreceived91%48%p < 00001Ninety-fivetolerateddefined5%requiringintermittentadaptationsstoppedperiodtypicallylasted1-2 weeksEarlierrelatedparticipationp = 004Eighty-fiveparticipantsopposedmedicalsupportteamSeventy-twoleast100%conductedstayParentsreportedacceptabilityCONCLUSION:reacheffectiveacceptableminimalcostadoptedfidelityInsightswithinresearchstudyinformedfuturestrategiesaidmaintenancedisseminationApplyingAdoptabilityEnvironmentFidelityOutcomesPretermTherapy

Similar Articles

Cited By