Exploring the barriers and facilitators of psychological safety in primary care teams: a qualitative study.

Ridhaa Remtulla, Arwa Hagana, Nour Houbby, Kajal Ruparell, Nivaran Aojula, Anannya Menon, Santhosh G Thavarajasingam, Edgar Meyer
Author Information
  1. Ridhaa Remtulla: College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. RXR529@student.bham.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Arwa Hagana: Imperial College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
  3. Nour Houbby: Imperial College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
  4. Kajal Ruparell: Imperial College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
  5. Nivaran Aojula: Imperial College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
  6. Anannya Menon: Imperial College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
  7. Santhosh G Thavarajasingam: Imperial College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
  8. Edgar Meyer: Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychological safety is the concept by which individuals feel comfortable expressing themselves in a work environment, without fear of embarrassment or criticism from others. Psychological safety in healthcare is associated with improved patient safety outcomes, enhanced physician engagement and fostering a creative learning environment. Therefore, it is important to establish the key levers which can act as facilitators or barriers to establishing psychological safety. Existing literature on psychological safety in healthcare teams has focused on secondary care, primarily from an individual profession perspective. In light of the increased focus on multidisciplinary work in primary care and the need for team-based studies, given that psychological safety is a team-based construct, this study sought to investigate the facilitators and barriers to psychological safety in primary care multidisciplinary teams.
METHODS: A mono-method qualitative research design was chosen for this study. Healthcare professionals from four primary care teams (n = 20) were recruited using snowball sampling. Data collection was through semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to generate findings.
RESULTS: Three meta themes surfaced: shared beliefs, facilitators and barriers to psychological safety. The shared beliefs offered insights into the teams' background functioning, providing important context to the facilitators and barriers of psychological safety specific to each team. Four barriers to psychological safety were identified: hierarchy, perceived lack of knowledge, personality and authoritarian leadership. Eight facilitators surfaced: leader and leader inclusiveness, open culture, vocal personality, support in silos, boundary spanner, chairing meetings, strong interpersonal relationships and small groups.
CONCLUSION: This study emphasises that factors influencing psychological safety can be individualistic, team-based or organisational. Although previous literature has largely focused on the role of leaders in promoting psychological safety, safe environments can be created by all team members. Members can facilitate psychological safety in instances where positive leadership behaviours are lacking - for example, strengthening interpersonal relationships, finding support in silos or rotating the chairperson in team meetings. It is anticipated that these findings will encourage practices to reflect on their team dynamics and adopt strategies to ensure every member's voice is heard.

Keywords

References

  1. Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Oct 14;5(4): [PMID: 29036901]
  2. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Apr;16(4):e377-e383 [PMID: 32074017]
  3. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Jun;62(6):576-86 [PMID: 25792523]
  4. J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28(6):754-76 [PMID: 25420355]
  5. Acad Med. 2009 Dec;84(12):1765-74 [PMID: 19940587]
  6. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2013 Dec;74(12):687-90 [PMID: 24326716]
  7. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov;219(5):1001-7 [PMID: 25256368]
  8. J Appl Psychol. 2012 Nov;97(6):1273-81 [PMID: 22985115]
  9. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):39-48 [PMID: 29954948]
  10. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014 Sep;5(4):87-8 [PMID: 25316987]
  11. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 Jan-Feb;23(1):40-44 [PMID: 29344045]
  12. Hosp Pediatr. 2016 May;6(5):275-81 [PMID: 27126798]
  13. Health Care Manage Rev. 2020 Jul/Sep;45(3):245-254 [PMID: 30080714]
  14. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Aug;67:100-107 [PMID: 29852398]
  15. Anaesthesia. 2016 Nov;71(11):1332-1340 [PMID: 27734483]
  16. BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 29;6(7):e012467 [PMID: 27473955]
  17. Health Care Manage Rev. 2014 Jul-Sep;39(3):186-97 [PMID: 23860515]
  18. J Oncol Pract. 2016 Nov;12(11):1000-1011 [PMID: 27756800]
  19. Med Educ. 2016 Mar;50(3):343-50 [PMID: 26896019]
  20. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jun;75(6):1229-1238 [PMID: 30478942]
  21. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Sep;41(5):545-7 [PMID: 25158659]
  22. J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):e230-e234 [PMID: 29112033]
  23. Med Educ. 2014 Jun;48(6):583-92 [PMID: 24807434]
  24. Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Mar;39(3):667-671 [PMID: 31902031]
  25. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 [PMID: 17872937]
  26. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 15;17(12): [PMID: 32549273]
  27. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 14;14:303 [PMID: 25017121]
  28. Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 27;10:2137 [PMID: 31632313]
  29. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Dec;72(12):2954-2965 [PMID: 27221824]
  30. Milbank Q. 2012 Jun;90(2):347-74 [PMID: 22709391]
  31. Nurs Manage. 2019 Aug;50(8):32-38 [PMID: 31361694]

MeSH Term

Health Personnel
Humans
Leadership
Patient Care Team
Primary Health Care
Qualitative Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0safetypsychologicalfacilitatorsbarrierscarecanprimarystudyteamPsychologicalteamsteam-basedworkenvironmenthealthcareimportantliteraturefocusedmultidisciplinaryqualitativefindingssurfaced:sharedbeliefspersonalityleadershipleadersupportsilosmeetingsinterpersonalrelationshipsBACKGROUND:conceptindividualsfeelcomfortableexpressingwithoutfearembarrassmentcriticismothersassociatedimprovedpatientoutcomesenhancedphysicianengagementfosteringcreativelearningThereforeestablishkeyleversactestablishingExistingsecondaryprimarilyindividualprofessionperspectivelightincreasedfocusneedstudiesgivenconstructsoughtinvestigateMETHODS:mono-methodresearchdesignchosenHealthcareprofessionalsfourn = 20recruitedusingsnowballsamplingDatacollectionsemi-structuredinterviewsThematicanalysisusedgenerateRESULTS:Threemetathemesofferedinsightsteams'backgroundfunctioningprovidingcontextspecificFouridentified:hierarchyperceivedlackknowledgeauthoritarianEightinclusivenessopenculturevocalboundaryspannerchairingstrongsmallgroupsCONCLUSION:emphasisesfactorsinfluencingindividualisticorganisationalAlthoughpreviouslargelyroleleaderspromotingsafeenvironmentscreatedmembersMembersfacilitateinstancespositivebehaviourslacking-examplestrengtheningfindingrotatingchairpersonanticipatedwillencouragepracticesreflectdynamicsadoptstrategiesensureeverymember'svoiceheardExploringteams:CommunityGeneralpracticePrimaryTeamwork

Similar Articles

Cited By