Trends in Cardiovascular MRI and CT in the U.S. Medicare Population from 2012 to 2017.

James W Goldfarb, Jonathan Weber
Author Information
  1. James W Goldfarb: Department of Research and Education, St Francis Hospital & Heart Center, 100 Port Washington Blvd, Roslyn, NY 11576. ORCID
  2. Jonathan Weber: Department of Research and Education, St Francis Hospital & Heart Center, 100 Port Washington Blvd, Roslyn, NY 11576.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the characteristics and trends of cardiovascular MRI and CT practitioners and practice in the United States.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2012-2017 Medicare Part B physician payments from the Provider Utilization and Payment Data Physician and Other Supplier Public Use Files (POSPUF) was performed. Characteristics of cardiovascular MRI and CT, including the number of providers and examinations, provider sex and location, and physician reimbursement were analyzed. Variable means, standard deviations, and changes per year were reported and compared.
RESULTS: In 2017, 582 physicians provided cardiovascular MRI services in 45 states, a 16.6% increase from 2016 and an 84.8% increase from 2012. A total of 1645 physicians provided cardiovascular CT services in 49 states, a 14.2% increase from 2016 and a 77.3% increase from 2012. Of the providers, 18.0% and 13.3% of cardiovascular MRI and CT providers were women, respectively, similar to providers' respective medical specialties. Only 1.0% of radiologists and 0.2% of cardiologists provided cardiovascular MRI services. A total of 3.2% of radiologists and 0.5% of cardiologists provided cardiovascular CT services. Both cardiovascular MRI use (+75.5%) and cardiovascular CT use (+97.4%) increased markedly over the 6-year study period.
CONCLUSION: Although the availability of cardiovascular MRI and CT is increasing, both are used less frequently in comparison with other cardiovascular imaging modalities.See also the commentary by Bierhals in this issue.© RSNA, 2021.

References

  1. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Oct;9(10):745-50 [PMID: 23025871]
  2. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Oct;27(10):1554-60 [PMID: 27461587]
  3. Radiol Manage. 2015 Mar-Apr;37(2):9-12 [PMID: 26485890]
  4. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Aug;22(4):826-39 [PMID: 26134884]
  5. N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 06;379(10):924-933 [PMID: 30145934]
  6. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):1392-1413 [PMID: 31250324]
  7. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;7(3):324-32 [PMID: 24651111]
  8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 5;65(17):1778-85 [PMID: 25777648]
  9. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Sep 25;19(1):70 [PMID: 28942735]
  10. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 4;7(17):e008981 [PMID: 30371164]
  11. Korean Circ J. 2014 Nov;44(6):359-85 [PMID: 25469139]
  12. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Aug;15(8):1061 [PMID: 30077306]
  13. Circulation. 2017 Jun 13;135(24):2320-2332 [PMID: 28389572]
  14. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Feb;16(2):147-155 [PMID: 30158087]
  15. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2014 Jul-Sep;10(3):152-8 [PMID: 25574342]
  16. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Oct;50(4):1336-1338 [PMID: 30773735]
  17. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 May - Jun;12(3):263-266 [PMID: 29628189]
  18. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):453-60 [PMID: 22196944]
  19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 5;65(17):1822-31 [PMID: 25777642]
  20. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 11;69(14):1761-1770 [PMID: 28385304]
  21. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 5;65(17):1810-21 [PMID: 25777650]
  22. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jan;11(1):12-9 [PMID: 24316232]
  23. JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039 [PMID: 29536101]
  24. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Jan 20;19(1):23 [PMID: 28187739]
  25. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jul;15(7):728-9 [PMID: 24855220]
  26. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Feb 24;22(1):17 [PMID: 32089132]
  27. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2418-2428 [PMID: 31216398]
  28. Can J Cardiol. 2018 Mar;34(3):333-336 [PMID: 29475533]
  29. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Feb;5(2):97-104 [PMID: 18242524]
  30. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 May;15(5):477-82 [PMID: 24639554]
  31. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jan-Feb;10(1):76-81 [PMID: 26699712]
  32. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Sep-Oct;5(5):279-85 [PMID: 21875825]
  33. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Nov 9;22(1):76 [PMID: 33161900]
  34. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;14(1):272-287 [PMID: 33168479]
  35. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Feb;16(2):147-53 [PMID: 25550363]
  36. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2008 Jul-Aug;2(4):263-71 [PMID: 19097329]
  37. JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1501-1509 [PMID: 31589283]
  38. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Aug 16;20(1):57 [PMID: 30111368]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cardiovascularMRICTprovidedservicesincreaseproviders20122%Medicarephysician2017physiciansstates2016total3%0%radiologists0cardiologists5%usePURPOSE:assesscharacteristicstrendspractitionerspracticeUnitedStatesMATERIALSANDMETHODS:retrospectivecross-sectionalanalysis2012-2017PartBpaymentsProviderUtilizationPaymentDataPhysicianSupplierPublicUseFilesPOSPUFperformedCharacteristicsincludingnumberexaminationsprovidersexlocationreimbursementanalyzedVariablemeansstandarddeviationschangesperyearreportedcomparedRESULTS:58245166%848%16454914771813womenrespectivelysimilarproviders'respectivemedicalspecialties13+75+974%increasedmarkedly6-yearstudyperiodCONCLUSION:AlthoughavailabilityincreasingusedlessfrequentlycomparisonimagingmodalitiesSeealsocommentaryBierhalsissue©RSNA2021TrendsCardiovascularUSPopulation

Similar Articles

Cited By