Does Paradoxical Leadership Facilitate Leaders' Task Performance? A Perspective of Self-Regulation Theory.

Silu Chen, Yu Zhang, Lili Liang, Tao Shen
Author Information
  1. Silu Chen: School of Economics and Business Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China. ORCID
  2. Yu Zhang: School of Economics and Business Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China.
  3. Lili Liang: School of Economics and Business Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China.
  4. Tao Shen: The Institute for Sustainable Development, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.

Abstract

As an emerging Chinese indigenous leadership style, paradoxical leadership has received considerable attention from researchers. Many studies have demonstrated the positive impact of paradoxical leadership on employees, teams, and organizations; however, there is less information on how paradoxical leaders influence their own work outcomes. On the basis of self-regulation theory, in this study, we examined the impact of paradoxical leadership on leaders' task performance. In addition, we investigated the mediating effects of job crafting and career resilience on this relationship. Through a survey of 120 leaders and 271 of their immediate followers, our empirical analysis found the following: (1) paradoxical leadership was positively related to leaders' task performance, (2) job crafting mediated the relationship between paradoxical leadership and leaders' task performance, and (3) career resilience positively moderated the relationship between paradoxical leadership and job crafting, and had an indirect effect on task performance through job crafting. Our model offers novel insights into the paradoxical leadership literature and implications for improving leaders' job crafting and task performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Jul-Aug;75(4):77-85 [PMID: 10168338]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 27;17(21): [PMID: 33121122]
  3. J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jun;102(6):971-981 [PMID: 28277726]
  4. J Appl Psychol. 2016 Feb;101(2):237-51 [PMID: 26348475]
  5. J Appl Psychol. 2000 Feb;85(1):65-74 [PMID: 10740957]
  6. Dev Psychopathol. 2003 Winter;15(1):139-62 [PMID: 12848439]
  7. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717-31 [PMID: 15641418]
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):320-33 [PMID: 14769087]
  9. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1570-83 [PMID: 18020797]
  10. Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(1):1-22 [PMID: 26609740]
  11. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Feb;36(2):273-84 [PMID: 17899361]
  12. J Appl Psychol. 2016 Aug;101(8):1082-96 [PMID: 27100068]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4): [PMID: 32059578]
  14. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jun;50(12):1715-22 [PMID: 10798327]
  15. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  16. Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 02;9:1083 [PMID: 30013498]

MeSH Term

Creativity
Leadership
Self-Control
Surveys and Questionnaires
Task Performance and Analysis

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0leadershipparadoxicaltaskperformancejobcraftingleaders'careerresiliencerelationshipimpactleadersself-regulationtheorypositivelyemergingChineseindigenousstylereceivedconsiderableattentionresearchersManystudiesdemonstratedpositiveemployeesteamsorganizationshoweverlessinformationinfluenceworkoutcomesbasisstudyexaminedadditioninvestigatedmediatingeffectssurvey120271immediatefollowersempiricalanalysisfoundfollowing:1related2mediated3moderatedindirecteffectmodeloffersnovelinsightsliteratureimplicationsimprovingParadoxicalLeadershipFacilitateLeaders'TaskPerformance?PerspectiveSelf-RegulationTheory

Similar Articles

Cited By