Light-Dependent Effects of Prefrontal rTMS on Emotional Working Memory.

Anne Weigand, Lisa Edelkraut, Markus Conrad, Simone Grimm, Malek Bajbouj
Author Information
  1. Anne Weigand: MSB Medical School Berlin, Rüdesheimer Straße 50, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
  2. Lisa Edelkraut: Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, University of Málaga, Av. de Cervantes, 2, 29016 Málaga, Spain. ORCID
  3. Markus Conrad: Department of Cognitive, Social and Organizational Psychology, Universidad de La Laguna, Campus Guajara, s/n, 38071 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
  4. Simone Grimm: MSB Medical School Berlin, Rüdesheimer Straße 50, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
  5. Malek Bajbouj: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that colored light exposure can affect several brain functions in addition to conscious visual perception. Blue as compared to green light has especially been shown to enhance alertness and vigilance, as well as cognitive functions. However, the role of light exposure in studies using non-invasive brain stimulation remains unclear. Here, we examined the impact of light on cognitive-emotional effects of prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). In a randomized within-subjects design, twenty participants (12 males, 26 ± 4 years) were exposed to blue or green light prior and concomitant to active or sham rTMS (1Hz, 15min, 110% of the resting motor threshold), applied over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). In each condition, an emotional working memory task (EMOBACK) was presented pre- and post-intervention. Stimuli of the EMOBACK task were positive, negative and neutral words. Our results revealed valence-specific stimulation effects in dependence of colored light exposure. More specifically, task accuracy was significantly increased for positive stimuli under blue light and for negative stimuli under green light exposure. Our findings highlight the importance of state-dependency in studies using non-invasive brain stimulation and show blue light exposure to be a potential adjunctive technique to rTMS for enhancing cognitive-emotional modulation.

Keywords

References

  1. Brain Cogn. 2014 Apr;86:1-9 [PMID: 24514153]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Feb 5;99(3):1736-41 [PMID: 11818573]
  3. J Physiol. 2010 Jul 1;588(Pt 13):2291-304 [PMID: 20478978]
  4. Neuropsychologia. 2020 Apr;141:107395 [PMID: 32142730]
  5. PLoS One. 2007 Nov 28;2(11):e1247 [PMID: 18043754]
  6. Exp Brain Res. 2013 May;227(1):43-52 [PMID: 23543102]
  7. Front Psychol. 2018 May 17;9:741 [PMID: 29867693]
  8. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 Sep;6(3):454-61 [PMID: 22544230]
  9. World Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;14(1):64-73 [PMID: 25655160]
  10. Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 23;9(1):345 [PMID: 30674951]
  11. Physiol Behav. 2017 Aug 1;177:208-214 [PMID: 28495465]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Jan;3(1):11-21 [PMID: 10234222]
  13. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Dec;17(12):2788-95 [PMID: 17404390]
  14. Science. 2009 Feb 27;323(5918):1226-9 [PMID: 19197022]
  15. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Dec;107:47-58 [PMID: 31473301]
  16. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Aug 15;52(4):312-7 [PMID: 12208638]
  17. Physiol Behav. 2018 Mar 1;185:1-13 [PMID: 29223712]
  18. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;11(2 Pt 2):425-30 [PMID: 19172531]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 9;107(45):19549-54 [PMID: 20974959]
  20. Psychol Bull. 2019 Jun;145(6):566-609 [PMID: 31021136]
  21. Neural Plast. 2015;2015:410785 [PMID: 26090234]
  22. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Dec;9(4):389-97 [PMID: 19897792]
  23. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0186399 [PMID: 29049332]
  24. Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):534-8 [PMID: 19363195]
  25. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Dec;25(12):2072-85 [PMID: 23859643]
  26. Conscious Cogn. 2014 May;26:97-104 [PMID: 24685568]
  27. Neuroreport. 2001 Aug 28;12(12):2779-83 [PMID: 11522965]
  28. Science. 2002 Feb 8;295(5557):1065-70 [PMID: 11834834]
  29. J ECT. 2001 Sep;17(3):184-9 [PMID: 11528309]
  30. Psychol Med. 2009 Jun;39(6):1019-28 [PMID: 18834555]
  31. Neuroscience. 2017 Nov 5;363:134-141 [PMID: 28893648]
  32. BMC Psychiatry. 2002;2:1 [PMID: 11825340]
  33. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528 [PMID: 31901449]
  34. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2005 Jan;24(1):41-3 [PMID: 15684542]
  35. J Neurosci. 2004 Mar 31;24(13):3379-85 [PMID: 15056717]
  36. Brain Topogr. 2010 Jan;22(4):219-32 [PMID: 19862614]
  37. Sleep. 2014 Feb 01;37(2):271-81 [PMID: 24501435]
  38. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Oct;13(10):429-38 [PMID: 19748817]
  39. PLoS One. 2017 Sep 18;12(9):e0184884 [PMID: 28922397]
  40. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039 [PMID: 19833552]
  41. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;162(4):656-62 [PMID: 15800134]
  42. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 07;8(10):e76707 [PMID: 24282477]
  43. Emotion. 2003 Dec;3(4):378-93 [PMID: 14674830]
  44. Sleep. 2016 Sep 01;39(9):1671-80 [PMID: 27253770]
  45. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 14;12(6):e0179430 [PMID: 28614399]
  46. Front Neurol. 2018 Feb 09;9:56 [PMID: 29479335]
  47. J Biol Rhythms. 2011 Jun;26(3):249-59 [PMID: 21628552]
  48. Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1188-94 [PMID: 22521253]
  49. Trends Neurosci. 2020 Jan;43(1):24-41 [PMID: 31836315]
  50. Brain Stimul. 2019 Sep - Oct;12(5):1338-1339 [PMID: 31186159]
  51. Emotion. 2012 Apr;12(2):384-93 [PMID: 22468619]
  52. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Oct 1;15(7):948-60 [PMID: 14614806]
  53. Cereb Cortex. 2016 Dec;26(12):4563-4573 [PMID: 26400923]
  54. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(8):2129-39 [PMID: 18440572]
  55. Brain Stimul. 2013 Nov;6(6):905-12 [PMID: 23928102]
  56. Psychiatry Res. 2006 Jan 30;141(1):1-13 [PMID: 16352348]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lightexposurestimulationrTMScoloredbraingreenbluetaskfunctionsstudiesusingnon-invasivecognitive-emotionaleffectsprefrontaltranscranialmagneticworkingmemoryEMOBACKpositivenegativestimulistate-dependencyGrowingevidencesuggestscanaffectseveraladditionconsciousvisualperceptionBluecomparedespeciallyshownenhancealertnessvigilancewellcognitiveHoweverroleremainsunclearexaminedimpactrepetitiverandomizedwithin-subjectsdesigntwentyparticipants12males26±4yearsexposedpriorconcomitantactivesham1Hz15min110%restingmotorthresholdappliedrightdorsolateralcortexDLPFCconditionemotionalpresentedpre-post-interventionStimulineutralwordsresultsrevealedvalence-specificdependencespecificallyaccuracysignificantlyincreasedfindingshighlightimportanceshowpotentialadjunctivetechniqueenhancingmodulationLight-DependentEffectsPrefrontalEmotionalWorkingMemoryemotion

Similar Articles

Cited By