Revisit once more the sensory storage account of visual working memory.

Yaoda Xu
Author Information
  1. Yaoda Xu: Yale University.

Abstract

Recent work has highlighted the role of early visual areas in visual working memory (VWM) storage and put forward a sensory storage account of VWM. Using a distractor interference paradigm, however, we previolsy showed that the contribution of early visual areas to VWM storage may not be essential. Instead, higher cortical regions such as the posterior parietal cortex may play a more significant role in VWM storage. This is consistent with reviews of other available behavioral, neuroimaging and neurophysiology results. Recently, a number of studies brought forward new evidence regarding this debate. Here I review these new pieces of evidence in detail and show that there is still no strong and definitive evidence supporting an essential role of the early visual areas in VWM storage. Instead, converging evidence suggests that early visual areas may contribute to the decision stage of a VWM task by facilitating target and probe comparison. Aside from further clarifying this debate, it is also important to note that whether or not VWM storage uses a sensory code depends on how it is defined, and that behavioral interactions between VWM and perception tasks do not necessarily support the involvement of sensory regions in VWM storage.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jan;19(1):34-48 [PMID: 29213134]
  2. Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:198-206 [PMID: 25463456]
  3. Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Oct;30(7):1393-400 [PMID: 19788574]
  4. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Aug;3(8):827-836 [PMID: 31285620]
  5. Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 05;8:13804 [PMID: 28054544]
  6. Trends Neurosci. 2018 Nov;41(11):806-822 [PMID: 30115412]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 20;104(47):18766-71 [PMID: 17998539]
  8. J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 19;32(38):12990-8 [PMID: 22993416]
  9. J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jan;31(1):49-63 [PMID: 30188780]
  10. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Oct;21(10):794-815 [PMID: 28774684]
  11. J Neurosci. 2016 Feb 3;36(5):1607-19 [PMID: 26843642]
  12. J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 2;29(48):15258-65 [PMID: 19955378]
  13. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jan;25(1):117-26 [PMID: 23198893]
  14. J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 10;33(15):6516-23 [PMID: 23575849]
  15. J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 4;32(1):4-11 [PMID: 22219265]
  16. Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jan;19(1):150-7 [PMID: 26595654]
  17. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Mar;22(3):192-193 [PMID: 29482822]
  18. Neuron. 2001 May;30(2):319-33 [PMID: 11394996]
  19. Nature. 1998 Oct 1;395(6701):500-3 [PMID: 9774105]
  20. Curr Biol. 2018 Nov 5;28(21):3435-3440.e4 [PMID: 30344121]
  21. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):111-124 [PMID: 28063661]
  22. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Sep;17(9):1255-62 [PMID: 25108910]
  23. J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 19;32(38):12983-9 [PMID: 22993415]
  24. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 May;25(5):754-61 [PMID: 23469889]
  25. Curr Biol. 2013 Aug 5;23(15):1427-31 [PMID: 23871239]
  26. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2018 Sep 15;4:311-336 [PMID: 29949722]
  27. Front Syst Neurosci. 2016 Jan 05;9:181 [PMID: 26778980]
  28. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:115-42 [PMID: 25251486]
  29. Nat Neurosci. 2019 Aug;22(8):1336-1344 [PMID: 31263205]
  30. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005 Jun;5(2):144-55 [PMID: 16180621]
  31. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Sep 1;116(3):1488-97 [PMID: 27440243]
  32. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Mar;21(3):511-8 [PMID: 18510449]
  33. Cereb Cortex. 2019 May 1;29(5):2034-2050 [PMID: 29659730]
  34. J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 20;30(42):14020-8 [PMID: 20962223]
  35. J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;38(44):9527-9538 [PMID: 30242053]
  36. Nature. 2006 Mar 2;440(7080):91-5 [PMID: 16382240]
  37. Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:97-107 [PMID: 28559190]
  38. Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):207-14 [PMID: 19170936]
  39. Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):751-4 [PMID: 15085133]
  40. Neuropsychologia. 2019 Sep;132:107140 [PMID: 31301350]
  41. J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 24;27(43):11676-86 [PMID: 17959810]
  42. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jan;19(1):32-41 [PMID: 17214561]
  43. Nat Neurosci. 2018 Apr;21(4):494-496 [PMID: 29507410]
  44. Neuron. 2016 Aug 3;91(3):694-707 [PMID: 27497224]
  45. Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jan 29;15(3):456-62, S1-2 [PMID: 22286175]
  46. J Neurosci. 2017 Sep 6;37(36):8767-8782 [PMID: 28821655]
  47. Neuron. 1995 Mar;14(3):477-85 [PMID: 7695894]
  48. Vision Res. 2016 Nov;128:53-67 [PMID: 27668990]
  49. Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 22;24(18):2174-2180 [PMID: 25201683]
  50. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202 [PMID: 11283309]
  51. Trends Neurosci. 2017 Jun;40(6):328-346 [PMID: 28515011]
  52. Neuron. 2015 Aug 19;87(4):893-905 [PMID: 26257053]
  53. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Jun;21(6):1254-72 [PMID: 21045004]
  54. Science. 1997 May 2;276(5313):821-4 [PMID: 9115211]
  55. J Neurosci. 2018 Jun 6;38(23):5267-5276 [PMID: 29739867]
  56. eNeuro. 2016 May 03;3(2): [PMID: 27294194]
  57. Prog Brain Res. 2017;236:1-23 [PMID: 29157407]
  58. J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):437-445 [PMID: 28077721]
  59. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Mar;22(3):189-190 [PMID: 29050827]
  60. J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Oct;29(10):1778-1789 [PMID: 28598733]
  61. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;24(3):242-258 [PMID: 32007384]
  62. Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jan 1;27(1):310-321 [PMID: 28108492]
  63. Cereb Cortex. 2018 Jun 1;28(6):2146-2161 [PMID: 28505235]
  64. Neuroimage. 2014 May 1;91:43-51 [PMID: 24480302]
  65. J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1226-1238 [PMID: 28253081]
  66. Nature. 2009 Apr 2;458(7238):632-5 [PMID: 19225460]

Grants

  1. R01 EY014193/NEI NIH HHS
  2. R01 EY022355/NEI NIH HHS
  3. R01 EY030854/NEI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0VWMvisualstorageearlyareassensoryevidenceroleworkingmemorymayforwardaccountessentialInsteadregionsposteriorparietalcortexbehavioralnewdebateRecentworkhighlightedputUsingdistractorinterferenceparadigmhoweverpreviolsyshowedcontributionhighercorticalplaysignificantconsistentreviewsavailableneuroimagingneurophysiologyresultsRecentlynumberstudiesbroughtregardingreviewpiecesdetailshowstillstrongdefinitivesupportingconvergingsuggestscontributedecisionstagetaskfacilitatingtargetprobecomparisonAsideclarifyingalsoimportantnotewhetherusescodedependsdefinedinteractionsperceptiontasksnecessarilysupportinvolvementRevisitattentionfMRI

Similar Articles

Cited By