Insulin, but Not Metformin, Supports Wound Healing Process in Rats with Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes.

Mateusz Mieczkowski, Beata Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska, Tomasz Siwko, Magdalena Bujalska-Zadrozny, Anna de Corde-Skurska, Renata Wolinska, Emilia Gasinska, Tomasz Grzela, Piotr Foltynski, Michal Kowara, Zofia Mieczkowska, Leszek Czupryniak
Author Information
  1. Mateusz Mieczkowski: Department of Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  2. Beata Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska: Department of Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  3. Tomasz Siwko: Department of Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  4. Magdalena Bujalska-Zadrozny: Department of Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  5. Anna de Corde-Skurska: Department of Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  6. Renata Wolinska: Department of Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  7. Emilia Gasinska: Department of Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  8. Tomasz Grzela: Department of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  9. Piotr Foltynski: Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  10. Michal Kowara: Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  11. Zofia Mieczkowska: Department of Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  12. Leszek Czupryniak: Department of Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. ORCID

Abstract

PURPOSE: Optimal glycemic control is crucial for proper wound healing in patients with diabetes. However, it is not clear whether other antidiabetic drugs support wound healing in mechanisms different from the normalization of blood glucose control. We assessed the effect of insulin and metformin administration on the wound healing process in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes.
METHODS: The study was conducted on 200 male Wistar rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. In the last phase of the study, 45 rats, with the most stable glucose levels in the range of 350-500 mg/dL, were divided into three groups: group I received human non-protamine insulin subcutaneously (5 IU/kg body mass) once a day, group II received metformin intragastrically (500 mg/kg b.m.), and group III (control) was given saline subcutaneously. After 14 days of antidiabetic treatment, a 2 cm × 2 cm thin layer of skin was cut from each rat's dorsum and a 4 cm disk with a hole in its center was sewn in to stabilize the skin and standardize the healing process. The wound healing process was followed up for 9 days, with assessment every 3 days. Biopsy samples were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical assays.
RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed significant influence of treatment type (insulin, control, or metformin) on the relative change in wound surface area. The wound healing process in rats treated with insulin was more effective than in the metformin and control groups. Wound tissue samples taken from the insulin-treated animals presented significantly lower levels of inflammatory infiltration. Immunohistochemical assessment showed the greatest density of centers of proliferation Ki-67 in insulin-treated animals.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that an insulin-based treatment is more beneficial than metformin, in terms of accelerating the wound healing process in an animal model of streptozocin-induced diabetes.

Keywords

References

  1. Wound Repair Regen. 2004 Nov-Dec;12(6):591-9 [PMID: 15555049]
  2. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013 Jan 30;700(1-3):165-72 [PMID: 23220163]
  3. Wound Repair Regen. 2000 Mar-Apr;8(2):83-96 [PMID: 10810034]
  4. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Mar;123:109776 [PMID: 31911295]
  5. Diabetes Care. 1992 Feb;15(2):256-60 [PMID: 1547682]
  6. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 May 04;13:1481-1489 [PMID: 32440177]
  7. Diabetologia. 2008 May;51(5):747-55 [PMID: 18297261]
  8. J Cancer. 2019 Apr 5;10(7):1734-1744 [PMID: 31205529]
  9. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Nov 10;13:4249-4260 [PMID: 33204131]
  10. Exp Diabetes Res. 2008;2008:704045 [PMID: 19132099]
  11. Biol Pharm Bull. 2002 Sep;25(9):1192-6 [PMID: 12230116]
  12. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2367-2375 [PMID: 28614678]
  13. J Invest Dermatol. 2011 Oct;131(10):2121-7 [PMID: 21697890]
  14. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2019;16(2):223-231 [PMID: 29336265]
  15. Lancet. 2005 Nov 12;366(9498):1736-43 [PMID: 16291068]
  16. Acta Histochem. 2016 Jun;118(5):544-52 [PMID: 27246286]
  17. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Feb 1;58(2):745-754 [PMID: 28146239]
  18. Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1784-7 [PMID: 16873780]
  19. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 27;352(4):341-50 [PMID: 15673800]
  20. Diabetes Ther. 2019 Oct;10(5):1771-1792 [PMID: 31456166]
  21. Drugs. 2019 Nov;79(17):1877-1884 [PMID: 31664708]
  22. BMC Endocr Disord. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):1 [PMID: 29338714]
  23. Pharmacology. 2008;81(2):151-7 [PMID: 17989504]
  24. Am J Transl Res. 2019 Feb 15;11(2):655-668 [PMID: 30899369]
  25. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Mar 13;13:719-727 [PMID: 32214835]
  26. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1957 Sep 1;111(4):409-19 [PMID: 13471093]
  27. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 15;9(1):11896 [PMID: 31417127]
  28. Wound Repair Regen. 2004 Jul-Aug;12(4):485-92 [PMID: 15260814]
  29. Nat Commun. 2016 Oct 07;7:12972 [PMID: 27713427]
  30. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 07;10(8):e0134622 [PMID: 26252747]
  31. Oncol Lett. 2016 Feb;11(2):1287-1293 [PMID: 26893732]
  32. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 5;13(3):e0192485 [PMID: 29505569]
  33. Arch Dermatol Res. 1998 Jul;290 Suppl:S1-11 [PMID: 9710378]
  34. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Aug;5(8):597-609 [PMID: 28615149]
  35. Life Sci. 2006 Feb 2;78(10):1084-90 [PMID: 16154155]
  36. Am J Transl Res. 2017 Oct 15;9(10):4682-4693 [PMID: 29118927]
  37. J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1404-9 [PMID: 25146022]
  38. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018 May;47(5):484-491 [PMID: 29573032]
  39. Int Wound J. 2014 Aug;11(4):373-8 [PMID: 23078553]
  40. Lab Invest. 2000 May;80(5):617-53 [PMID: 10830774]
  41. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1999 Dec;26(3-4):259-65 [PMID: 10575137]
  42. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Oct 1;:1932296820959346 [PMID: 33000645]
  43. Experientia. 1979 Dec 15;35(12):1679-80 [PMID: 160326]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0woundhealingcontroldiabetesmetforminprocessinsulinratsgroupdaystreatmentcmantidiabeticglucosestreptozotocin-inducedstudylevelsreceivedsubcutaneously2skinassessmentsamplesWoundinsulin-treatedanimalsanimalmodelPURPOSE:OptimalglycemiccrucialproperpatientsHoweverclearwhetherdrugssupportmechanismsdifferentnormalizationbloodassessedeffectadministrationMETHODS:conducted200maleWistarlastphase45stablerange350-500mg/dLdividedthreegroups:humannon-protamine5IU/kgbodymassdayIIintragastrically500mg/kgbmIIIgivensaline14×thinlayercutrat'sdorsum4diskholecentersewnstabilizestandardizefollowed9every3BiopsysubjectedhematoxylineosinstainingimmunohistochemicalassaysRESULTS:AnalysisvariancerevealedsignificantinfluencetyperelativechangesurfaceareatreatedeffectivegroupstissuetakenpresentedsignificantlylowerinflammatoryinfiltrationImmunohistochemicalshowedgreatestdensitycentersproliferationKi-67CONCLUSION:resultssuggestinsulin-basedbeneficialtermsacceleratingstreptozocin-inducedInsulinMetforminSupportsHealingProcessRatsStreptozotocin-InducedDiabetesmellitusneuropathyulceration

Similar Articles

Cited By