The Regeneración Urbana, Calidad de Vida y Salud - RUCAS project: a Chilean multi-methods study to evaluate the impact of urban regeneration on resident health and wellbeing.

Fernando Baeza, Alejandra Vives Vergara, Francisca González, Laura Orlando, Roxana Valdebenito, Andrea Cortinez-O'Ryan, Claire Slesinski, Ana V Diez Roux
Author Information
  1. Fernando Baeza: Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
  2. Alejandra Vives Vergara: Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile. alejandra.vives@uc.cl.
  3. Francisca González: Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
  4. Laura Orlando: Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
  5. Roxana Valdebenito: Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
  6. Andrea Cortinez-O'Ryan: Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
  7. Claire Slesinski: Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
  8. Ana V Diez Roux: Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The available evidence of the health effects of urban regeneration is scarce In Latin America, and there are no studies focused on formal housing that longitudinally evaluate the impact of housing and neighborhood interventions on health. The "Regeneración Urbana, Calidad de Vida y Salud" (Urban Regeneration, Quality of Life, and Health) or RUCAS project is a longitudinal, multi-method study that will evaluate the impact of an intervention focused on dwellings, built environment and community on the health and wellbeing of the population in two social housing neighborhoods in Chile.
METHODS: RUCAS consists of a longitudinal study where inhabitants exposed and unexposed to the intervention will be compared over time within the study neighborhoods (cohorts), capitalizing on interventions as a natural experiment. Researchers have developed a specific conceptual framework and identified potential causal mechanisms. Proximal and more distal intervention effects will be measured with five instruments, implemented pre- and post-interventions between 2018 and 2021: a household survey, an observation tool to evaluate dwelling conditions, hygrochrons for measuring temperature and humidity inside dwellings, systematic observation of recreational areas, and qualitative interviews. Survey baseline data (956 households, 3130 individuals) is presented to describe sociodemographics, housing and health characteristics of both cohorts, noting that neighborhoods studied show worse conditions than the Chilean population.
DISCUSSION: RUCAS' design allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the effects that the intervention could have on various dimensions of health and health determinants. RUCAS will face some challenges, like changes in the intervention process due to adjustments of the master plan, exogenous factors -including COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns- and lost to follow-up. Given the stepped wedge design, that the study capitalizes on within household changes over time, the possibility of adjusting data collection process and complementarity of methods, RUCAS has the flexibility to adapt to these circumstances. Also, RUCAS' outreach and retention strategy has led to high retention rates. RUCAS will provide evidence to inform regeneration processes, highlighting the need to consider potential health effects of regeneration in designing such interventions and, more broadly, health as a key priority in urban and housing policies.

Keywords

References

  1. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5 [PMID: 14258950]
  2. Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Dec;3(12):e503-e510 [PMID: 31836433]
  3. Health Place. 2012 Sep;18(5):1172-87 [PMID: 22717379]
  4. Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 10;8:64 [PMID: 32211367]
  5. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 May;67(5):389-91 [PMID: 23413097]
  6. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1992 Aug;27(4):168-73 [PMID: 1411744]
  7. Am J Epidemiol. 2012 May 15;175(10):1045-53 [PMID: 22472117]
  8. J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3 Suppl 1:S208-S222 [PMID: 20976027]
  9. Gac Sanit. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):182-9 [PMID: 22112713]
  10. J Urban Health. 2013 Oct;90(5):810-31 [PMID: 23271143]
  11. Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92 [PMID: 14583691]
  12. Prev Med. 2016 Jul;88:115-26 [PMID: 27068650]
  13. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Sep;261:113102 [PMID: 32739786]
  14. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:95-104 [PMID: 25596373]
  15. Prev Med. 2013 Dec;57(6):941-7 [PMID: 23954184]
  16. Health Place. 2015 May;33:101-8 [PMID: 25814338]
  17. Pediatrics. 1997 Jun;99(6):830-7 [PMID: 9164778]
  18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD010067 [PMID: 23440845]
  19. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e47526 [PMID: 23144822]
  20. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 May 11;10:41 [PMID: 20459767]
  21. Am J Public Health. 1999 Aug;89(8):1187-93 [PMID: 10432904]
  22. Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Nov;31 Suppl 1:51-64 [PMID: 26648363]
  23. Glob Chall. 2018 Jun 19;3(4):1800013 [PMID: 31565372]
  24. Obes Rev. 2015 May;16(5):362-75 [PMID: 25753170]
  25. BMJ. 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):460 [PMID: 17324975]
  26. Cad Saude Publica. 2017 Apr 20;33(3):e00156215 [PMID: 28444027]
  27. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(18):3447-3464 [PMID: 31666140]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 26;15(2): [PMID: 29373567]
  29. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Aug 7;: [PMID: 28784629]
  30. J Urban Health. 2003 Dec;80(4):556-68 [PMID: 14709705]
  31. J Public Health Res. 2015 Nov 17;4(3):589 [PMID: 26753162]
  32. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005 Sep 14;2:13 [PMID: 16162285]
  33. Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1825-38 [PMID: 17706331]
  34. BMJ. 2015 Feb 06;350:h391 [PMID: 25662947]
  35. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD008657 [PMID: 23450585]
  36. BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 24;19(1):1358 [PMID: 31651269]
  37. PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0177262 [PMID: 28486487]
  38. Atmos Environ (1994). 2013 May 1;70:179-185 [PMID: 23956679]
  39. Am J Public Health. 2016 Mar;106(3):430-1 [PMID: 26885960]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust
  2. 205177/Z/16/Z/Wellcome Trust
  3. P30 DK111022/NIDDK NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Activities of Daily Living
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
COVID-19
Child
Child, Preschool
Chile
Communicable Disease Control
Environment Design
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Latin America
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Pandemics
Public Housing
Quality of Life
Residence Characteristics
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthRUCASstudyregenerationhousingwillinterventioneffectsevaluateurbanimpactinterventionsUrbanlongitudinalneighborhoodsevidenceLatinAmericafocusedUrbanaCalidaddeVidaydwellingswellbeingpopulationtimewithincohortsexperimentpotentialhouseholdobservationconditionsdataChileanRUCAS'designchangesprocessretentionHousingBACKGROUND:availablescarcestudiesformallongitudinallyneighborhood"RegeneraciónSalud"RegenerationQualityLifeHealthprojectmulti-methodbuiltenvironmentcommunitytwosocialChileMETHODS:consistsinhabitantsexposedunexposedcomparedcapitalizingnaturalResearchersdevelopedspecificconceptualframeworkidentifiedcausalmechanismsProximaldistalmeasuredfiveinstrumentsimplementedpre-post-interventions20182021:surveytooldwellinghygrochronsmeasuringtemperaturehumidityinsidesystematicrecreationalareasqualitativeinterviewsSurveybaseline956households3130individualspresenteddescribesociodemographicscharacteristicsnotingstudiedshowworseDISCUSSION:allowscomprehensiveevaluationvariousdimensionsdeterminantsfacechallengeslikedueadjustmentsmasterplanexogenousfactors-includingCOVID-19pandemicassociatedlockdowns-lostfollow-upGivensteppedwedgecapitalizespossibilityadjustingcollectioncomplementaritymethodsflexibilityadaptcircumstancesAlsooutreachstrategyledhighratesprovideinformprocesseshighlightingneedconsiderdesigningbroadlykeyprioritypoliciesRegeneraciónSalud-project:multi-methodsresidentimprovementpolicyNaturalNeighborhoodrenewalProspective

Similar Articles

Cited By