Aging Increases Prosocial Motivation for Effort.

Patricia L Lockwood, Ayat Abdurahman, Anthony S Gabay, Daniel Drew, Marin Tamm, Masud Husain, Matthew A J Apps
Author Information
  1. Patricia L Lockwood: Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham. ORCID
  2. Ayat Abdurahman: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
  3. Anthony S Gabay: Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham.
  4. Daniel Drew: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
  5. Marin Tamm: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
  6. Masud Husain: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
  7. Matthew A J Apps: Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham.

Abstract

Social cohesion relies on prosociality in increasingly aging populations. Helping other people requires effort, yet how willing people are to exert effort to benefit themselves and others, and whether such behaviors shift across the life span, is poorly understood. Using computational modeling, we tested the willingness of 95 younger adults (18-36 years old) and 92 older adults (55-84 years old) to put physical effort into self- and other-benefiting acts. Participants chose whether to work and exert force (30%-70% of maximum grip strength) for rewards (2-10 credits) accrued for themselves or, prosocially, for another. Younger adults were somewhat selfish, choosing to work more at higher effort levels for themselves, and exerted less force in prosocial work. Strikingly, compared with younger adults, older people were more willing to put in effort for others and exerted equal force for themselves and others. Increased prosociality in older people has important implications for human behavior and societal structure.

Keywords

References

  1. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;36(3-4):242-50 [PMID: 23949210]
  2. Behav Processes. 2013 Nov;100:192-6 [PMID: 24140077]
  3. Brain. 2018 Mar 1;141(3):629-650 [PMID: 29194534]
  4. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169938 [PMID: 28076387]
  5. PLoS Biol. 2017 Feb 24;15(2):e1002598 [PMID: 28234892]
  6. J Stat Softw. 2016;75: [PMID: 32655332]
  7. Emotion. 2012 Oct;12(5):1129-40 [PMID: 21859198]
  8. Curr Biol. 2015 Jul 20;25(14):1852-9 [PMID: 26144968]
  9. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005 Winter;17(1):7-19 [PMID: 15746478]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 30;113(35):9763-8 [PMID: 27528669]
  11. Lancet Neurol. 2004 Jun;3(6):343-53 [PMID: 15157849]
  12. J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 15;40(3):661-670 [PMID: 31727795]
  13. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 11;7(1):17293 [PMID: 29229968]
  14. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Oct;47(10):2992-3006 [PMID: 28699053]
  15. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124 [PMID: 28375769]
  16. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Mar 27;11(3):e1004116 [PMID: 25816114]
  17. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):2021-2030 [PMID: 28315168]
  18. Neuropsychologia. 2019 Dec;135:107243 [PMID: 31698010]
  19. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jun;148(6):962-976 [PMID: 30998038]
  20. Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1913-5 [PMID: 16809530]
  21. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jun;21(6):425-433 [PMID: 28476348]
  22. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e68210 [PMID: 23894295]
  23. Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 12;9(1):4747 [PMID: 30420714]
  24. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Mar;70(2):202-14 [PMID: 24056582]
  25. Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Dec;2(12):899-908 [PMID: 30988433]
  26. Dev Psychol. 2016 Aug;52(8):1192-205 [PMID: 27337508]
  27. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Mar;70(2):215-24 [PMID: 24115776]
  28. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 May;16(5):278-89 [PMID: 25873038]
  29. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Apr 26;8:74 [PMID: 27199731]
  30. Nature. 2003 Oct 23;425(6960):785-91 [PMID: 14574401]
  31. Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jul;1(7):0131 [PMID: 28819649]
  32. Curr Biol. 2015 Jun 29;25(13):1707-16 [PMID: 26096975]
  33. J Res Adolesc. 2005;15(3):235-260 [PMID: 20592955]
  34. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jul;67(4):447-55 [PMID: 22131365]
  35. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 May;67(3):289-98 [PMID: 21926401]
  36. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):761-771 [PMID: 32232358]

Grants

  1. /Department of Health
  2. 098282/Wellcome Trust
  3. MR/P014097/2/Medical Research Council
  4. 206330/Z/17/Z/Wellcome Trust
  5. MR/P014097/1/Medical Research Council
  6. BB/R010668/1/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  7. /Wellcome Trust
  8. 203139/Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Cooperative Behavior
Humans
Middle Aged
Motivation
Physical Exertion
Reward
Social Behavior
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0effortpeopleadultsothersolderworkforceprosocialityagingwillingexertwhethercomputationalmodelingyoungeryearsoldputexertedprosocialbehaviorSocialcohesionreliesincreasinglypopulationsHelpingrequiresyetbenefitbehaviorsshiftacrosslifespanpoorlyunderstoodUsingtestedwillingness9518-369255-84physicalself-other-benefitingactsParticipantschose30%-70%maximumgripstrengthrewards2-10creditsaccruedprosociallyanotherYoungersomewhatselfishchoosinghigherlevelslessStrikinglycomparedequalIncreasedimportantimplicationshumansocietalstructureAgingIncreasesProsocialMotivationEffortmotivationopendatareward

Similar Articles

Cited By