What Constitutes Authorship in the Social Sciences?

Gernot Pruschak
Author Information
  1. Gernot Pruschak: Department for Business Decisions and Analytics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Abstract

Authorship represents a highly discussed topic in nowadays academia. The share of co-authored papers has increased substantially in recent years allowing scientists to specialize and focus on specific tasks. Arising from this, social scientific literature has especially discussed author orders and the distribution of publication and citation credits among co-authors in depth. Yet only a small fraction of the authorship literature has also addressed the actual underlying question of what actually constitutes authorship. To identify social scientists' motives for assigning authorship, we conduct an empirical study surveying researchers around the globe. We find that social scientists tend to distribute research tasks among (individual) research team members. Nevertheless, they generally adhere to the universally applicable Vancouver criteria when distributing authorship. More specifically, participation in every research task with the exceptions of data work as well as reviewing and remarking increases scholars' chances to receive authorship. Based on our results, we advise journal editors to introduce authorship guidelines that incorporate the Vancouver criteria as they seem applicable to the social sciences. We further call upon research institutions to emphasize data skills in hiring and promotion processes as publication counts might not always depict these characteristics.

Keywords

References

  1. Yale J Biol Med. 2011 Sep;84(3):181-90 [PMID: 21966034]
  2. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Sep 30;15:55 [PMID: 25266119]
  3. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008 Sep;295(3):C567-75 [PMID: 18776156]
  4. Scientometrics. 2016;107:723-744 [PMID: 27122647]
  5. PLoS Biol. 2016 May 12;14(5):e1002456 [PMID: 27171007]
  6. Psychol Rep. 2000 Jun;86(3 Pt 1):771-88 [PMID: 10876325]
  7. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Sep 14;291(6497):722 [PMID: 3929914]
  8. BMJ. 2011 Oct 25;343:d6128 [PMID: 22028479]
  9. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1160-72 [PMID: 25308141]
  10. Harv Bus Rev. 2012 Oct;90(10):70-6, 128 [PMID: 23074866]
  11. Mutat Res. 2005 Jan;589(1):31-45 [PMID: 15652225]
  12. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Feb 6;296(6619):401-5 [PMID: 3125922]
  13. Br J Clin Psychol. 1999 Sep;38(3):215-29 [PMID: 10532145]
  14. J Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;42(3):199-202 [PMID: 26714812]
  15. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):629-645 [PMID: 28397174]
  16. Sci Adv. 2017 Nov 08;3(11):e1700404 [PMID: 29152564]
  17. BMJ. 1997 Apr 5;314(7086):992 [PMID: 9112837]
  18. PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124 [PMID: 16060722]
  19. J Dent Res. 1997 Mar;76(3):724-7 [PMID: 9109819]
  20. J Public Health Afr. 2017 Jun 27;8(1):723 [PMID: 28748064]
  21. JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):217-8 [PMID: 9676659]
  22. Ambio. 2017 Feb;46(1):121-127 [PMID: 27686730]
  23. JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2769-71 [PMID: 12038907]
  24. JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):222-4 [PMID: 9676661]
  25. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23477 [PMID: 21931600]
  26. Science. 1998 Sep 4;281(5382):1459-60 [PMID: 9750115]
  27. MedGenMed. 2007 Jul 19;9(3):16 [PMID: 18092023]
  28. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 09;11(3):e0149504 [PMID: 26960191]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0authorshipresearchsocialtasksAuthorshipdiscussedscientistsliteraturepublicationamongapplicableVancouvercriteriadatarepresentshighlytopicnowadaysacademiashareco-authoredpapersincreasedsubstantiallyrecentyearsallowingspecializefocusspecificArisingscientificespeciallyauthorordersdistributioncitationcreditsco-authorsdepthYetsmallfractionalsoaddressedactualunderlyingquestionactuallyconstitutesidentifyscientists'motivesassigningconductempiricalstudysurveyingresearchersaroundglobefindtenddistributeindividualteammembersNeverthelessgenerallyadhereuniversallydistributingspecificallyparticipationeverytaskexceptionsworkwellreviewingremarkingincreasesscholars'chancesreceiveBasedresultsadvisejournaleditorsintroduceguidelinesincorporateseemsciencescalluponinstitutionsemphasizeskillshiringpromotionprocessescountsmightalwaysdepictcharacteristicsConstitutesSocialSciences?academicincentivesystemethicsspecializationsurvey

Similar Articles

Cited By