Auditory and visual short-term memory: influence of material type, contour, and musical expertise.

Francesca Talamini, Salomé Blain, Jérémie Ginzburg, Olivier Houix, Patrick Bouchet, Massimo Grassi, Barbara Tillmann, Anne Caclin
Author Information
  1. Francesca Talamini: Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR 5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France. Francesca.Talamini@uibk.ac.at. ORCID
  2. Salomé Blain: Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR 5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  3. Jérémie Ginzburg: Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR 5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  4. Olivier Houix: STMS ircam-CNRS-SU, 75004, Paris, France.
  5. Patrick Bouchet: Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR 5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  6. Massimo Grassi: Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padua, Italy.
  7. Barbara Tillmann: Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR 5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  8. Anne Caclin: Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR 5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.

Abstract

Short-term memory has mostly been investigated with verbal or visuospatial stimuli and less so with other categories of stimuli. Moreover, the influence of sensory modality has been explored almost solely in the verbal domain. The present study compared visual and auditory short-term memory for different types of materials, aiming to understand whether sensory modality and material type can influence short-term memory performance. Furthermore, we aimed to assess if music expertise can modulate memory performance, as previous research has reported better auditory memory (and to some extent, visual memory), and better auditory contour recognition for musicians than non-musicians. To do so, we adapted the same recognition paradigm (delayed-matching to sample) across different types of stimuli. In each trial, participants (musicians and non-musicians) were presented with two sequences of events, separated by a silent delay, and had to indicate whether the two sequences were identical or different. The performance was compared for auditory and visual materials belonging to three different categories: (1) verbal (i.e., syllables); (2) nonverbal (i.e., that could not be easily denominated) with contour (based on loudness or luminance variations); and (3) nonverbal without contour (pink noise sequences or kanji letters sequences). Contour and no-contour conditions referred to whether the sequence can entail (or not) a contour (i.e., a pattern of up and down changes) based on non-pitch features. Results revealed a selective advantage of musicians for auditory no-contour stimuli and for contour stimuli (both visual and auditory), suggesting that musical expertise is associated with specific short-term memory advantages in domains close to the trained domain, also extending cross-modally when stimuli have contour information. Moreover, our results suggest a role of encoding strategies (i.e., how the material is represented mentally during the task) for short-term-memory performance.

References

  1. Memory. 2013 Apr;21(3):377-95 [PMID: 23116413]
  2. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):417-423 [PMID: 11058819]
  3. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 May;32(5):771-83 [PMID: 20533560]
  4. Brain Res. 2016 Jun 1;1640(Pt B):251-63 [PMID: 26505915]
  5. Mem Cognit. 2002 Oct;30(7):1086-95 [PMID: 12507373]
  6. Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):830-46 [PMID: 22178808]
  7. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987 Aug;13(3):384-94 [PMID: 2958587]
  8. Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):259-64 [PMID: 19762140]
  9. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Apr;1252:179-84 [PMID: 22524357]
  10. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Sep;32(5):1208-15 [PMID: 16938058]
  11. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):971-95 [PMID: 21264748]
  12. Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:323-38 [PMID: 18394484]
  13. Dyslexia. 2012 May;18(2):94-109 [PMID: 22389071]
  14. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1083-1094 [PMID: 21315092]
  15. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1990 Oct;75(1):55-74 [PMID: 2260493]
  16. Brain Cogn. 2019 Nov;136:103614 [PMID: 31546175]
  17. Percept Psychophys. 1978 Dec;24(6):551-65 [PMID: 751000]
  18. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60676 [PMID: 23565267]
  19. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Feb;161(1):1-10 [PMID: 15551089]
  20. Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Sep;3(3):300-13 [PMID: 24213931]
  21. Exp Brain Res. 1989;74(1):139-48 [PMID: 2924831]
  22. Brain Res. 2013 Nov 6;1537:224-32 [PMID: 24041778]
  23. Neuroreport. 2016 Jan 20;27(2):94-8 [PMID: 26619232]
  24. Hear Res. 2014 Feb;308:109-21 [PMID: 23988583]
  25. Vision Res. 2014 Jun;99:19-36 [PMID: 24075900]
  26. Cognition. 2016 Oct;155:113-124 [PMID: 27376662]
  27. Memory. 2010 Aug;18(6):657-69 [PMID: 20706954]
  28. Cereb Cortex. 1996 Jan-Feb;6(1):11-20 [PMID: 8670634]
  29. Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):340-51 [PMID: 14741672]
  30. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):111-124 [PMID: 28063661]
  31. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Oct;12(4):517-24 [PMID: 2945898]
  32. Neuropsychologia. 1992 Mar;30(3):277-92 [PMID: 1574162]
  33. Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):312-5 [PMID: 15772648]
  34. Neuroscience. 2018 Oct 1;389:141-151 [PMID: 28461217]
  35. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 19;11(12):e0168699 [PMID: 27992565]
  36. Ann Dyslexia. 2014 Jul;64(2):121-36 [PMID: 24488229]
  37. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Nov;37(6):1329-41 [PMID: 21859231]
  38. J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Feb;93(2):95-119 [PMID: 16154583]
  39. Brain Res. 2008 Jan 23;1190:132-42 [PMID: 18083147]
  40. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:524+ [PMID: 5541747]
  41. Br J Psychol. 1967 Nov;58(3):421-33 [PMID: 4870154]
  42. Neuropsychology. 2006 Sep;20(5):529-38 [PMID: 16938015]
  43. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0186773 [PMID: 29049416]
  44. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jul;122(1):418-35 [PMID: 17614500]
  45. J Neurosci. 1998 Jun 1;18(11):4244-54 [PMID: 9592102]
  46. Hear Res. 2006 Sep;219(1-2):36-47 [PMID: 16839723]
  47. Q J Exp Psychol. 1966 Aug;18(3):206-11 [PMID: 5947474]
  48. Cogn Psychol. 1986 Apr;18(2):123-57 [PMID: 3709106]
  49. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 May;35(5):2412-23 [PMID: 23913849]
  50. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jul-Aug;16(6):1010-21 [PMID: 15298788]
  51. Brain Cogn. 2017 Apr;113:10-22 [PMID: 28088063]
  52. Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1263-71 [PMID: 19121136]
  53. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 15;8(1):9223 [PMID: 29907812]
  54. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Aug;11(8):599-605 [PMID: 20648064]
  55. Empir Musicol Rev. 2008 Oct 1;3(4):178-186 [PMID: 21394231]
  56. Mem Cognit. 1990 May;18(3):251-69 [PMID: 2192233]
  57. Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):1080-90 [PMID: 17128606]
  58. Can J Exp Psychol. 1994 Sep;48(3):380-98 [PMID: 7951198]
  59. Percept Psychophys. 1986 Nov;40(5):351-8 [PMID: 3786104]
  60. Mem Cognit. 2010 Mar;38(2):163-75 [PMID: 20173189]
  61. Cognition. 2017 Dec;169:36-45 [PMID: 28806722]
  62. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):586-91 [PMID: 21374094]
  63. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 15;5(6):e11120 [PMID: 20559545]
  64. J Neurosci. 2001 Oct 15;21(20):RC177 [PMID: 11588207]
  65. Psychol Aging. 1999 Dec;14(4):572-94 [PMID: 10632146]
  66. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 May;6(3):319-32 [PMID: 7373250]
  67. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov;11(11):466-72 [PMID: 17981074]
  68. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 May 9;: [PMID: 29744897]

Grants

  1. ANR-10-LABX-0060/LABEX CeLyA
  2. ANR-11-LABX-0042/LABEX CORTEX

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Auditory Perception
Cognition
Humans
Memory, Short-Term
Music
Recognition, Psychology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0memorycontourstimuliauditoryvisualshort-termdifferentperformancesequencesieverbalinfluencewhethermaterialcanexpertisemusiciansMoreoversensorymodalitydomaincomparedtypesmaterialstypebetterrecognitionnon-musicianstwononverbalbasedno-contourmusicalShort-termmostlyinvestigatedvisuospatiallesscategoriesexploredalmostsolelypresentstudyaimingunderstandFurthermoreaimedassessmusicmodulatepreviousresearchreportedextentadaptedparadigmdelayed-matchingsampleacrosstrialparticipantspresentedeventsseparatedsilentdelayindicateidenticalbelongingthreecategories:1syllables2easilydenominatedloudnessluminancevariations3withoutpinknoisekanjilettersContourconditionsreferredsequenceentailpatternchangesnon-pitchfeaturesResultsrevealedselectiveadvantagesuggestingassociatedspecificadvantagesdomainsclosetrainedalsoextendingcross-modallyinformationresultssuggestroleencodingstrategiesrepresentedmentallytaskshort-term-memoryAuditorymemory:

Similar Articles

Cited By