Rapid nanopore-based DNA sequencing protocol of antibiotic-resistant bacteria for use in surveillance and outbreak investigation.

Fabienne Antunes Ferreira, Karin Helmersen, Tina Visnovska, Silje Bakken Jørgensen, Hege Vangstein Aamot
Author Information
  1. Fabienne Antunes Ferreira: Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
  2. Karin Helmersen: Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
  3. Tina Visnovska: Bioinformatics Core Facility, Oslo University Hospital Radium, Oslo, Norway.
  4. Silje Bakken Jørgensen: Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
  5. Hege Vangstein Aamot: Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

Abstract

Outbreak investigations are essential to control and prevent the dissemination of pathogens. This study developed and validated a complete analysis protocol for faster and more accurate surveillance and outbreak investigations of antibiotic-resistant microbes based on Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) DNA whole-genome sequencing. The protocol was developed using 42 methicillin-resistant (MRSA) isolates identified from former well-characterized outbreaks. The validation of the protocol was performed using Illumina technology (MiSeq, Illumina). Additionally, a real-time outbreak investigation of six clinical isolates was conducted to test the ONT-based protocol. The suggested protocol includes: (1) a 20 h sequencing run; (2) identification of the sequence type (ST); (3) genome assembly; (4) polishing of the draft genomes; and (5) phylogenetic analysis based on SNPs. After the sequencing run, it was possible to identify the ST in 2 h (20 min per isolate). Assemblies were achieved after 4 h (40 min per isolate) while the polishing was carried out in 7 min per isolate (42 min in total). The phylogenetic analysis took 0.6 h to confirm an outbreak. Overall, the developed protocol was able to at least discard an outbreak in 27 h (mean) after the bacterial identification and less than 33 h to confirm it. All these estimated times were calculated considering the average time for six MRSA isolates per sequencing run. During the real-time outbreak investigation, the protocol was able to identify two outbreaks in less than 31 h. The suggested protocol enables identification of outbreaks in early stages using a portable and low-cost device along with a streamlined downstream analysis, therefore having the potential to be incorporated in routine surveillance analysis workflows. In addition, further analysis may include identification of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes for improved pathogen characterization.

Keywords

References

  1. Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 15;31(20):3350-2 [PMID: 26099265]
  2. J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jun;55(6):1946-1953 [PMID: 28404677]
  3. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 6;10(1):16553 [PMID: 33024212]
  4. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2020 Mar;69(1):e96 [PMID: 32162851]
  5. BMC Genomics. 2017 Jan 5;18(1):19 [PMID: 28056767]
  6. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 May;37(5):540-546 [PMID: 30936562]
  7. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Oct;36(10):1911-1921 [PMID: 28555401]
  8. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Jan 23;16(1):e1007314 [PMID: 31971941]
  9. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 11;9(8):e104984 [PMID: 25110940]
  10. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 Jul;12(7):627-33 [PMID: 16774558]
  11. Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 4;8(1):17596 [PMID: 30514867]
  12. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jan;72(1):104-114 [PMID: 27667325]
  13. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Apr;24(4):355-360 [PMID: 29117578]
  14. J Hosp Infect. 2014 Oct;88(2):72-7 [PMID: 25085462]
  15. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 09;11(2):e0148772 [PMID: 26859765]
  16. PeerJ. 2018 Jul 31;6:e5233 [PMID: 30083440]
  17. Mol Biol Evol. 2014 May;31(5):1077-88 [PMID: 24600054]
  18. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 May 31;4:18033 [PMID: 29849094]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 16;116(29):14599-14605 [PMID: 31262808]
  20. F1000Res. 2019 Dec 23;8:2138 [PMID: 31984131]
  21. Microb Genom. 2021 Jun;7(6): [PMID: 31682222]
  22. PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5082 [PMID: 19343175]
  23. J Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 28;221(Suppl 3):S292-S307 [PMID: 31612214]
  24. Gigascience. 2019 Aug 1;8(8): [PMID: 31433830]
  25. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Dec;52(12):4305-8 [PMID: 25297335]
  26. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017 Oct;30(4):1015-1063 [PMID: 28855266]
  27. Nature. 2016 Feb 11;530(7589):228-232 [PMID: 26840485]
  28. J Hosp Infect. 2017 Mar;95(3):253-258 [PMID: 28131643]
  29. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;19(1):56-66 [PMID: 30409683]
  30. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(4):1355-61 [PMID: 22238442]
  31. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Feb 18;43(3):e15 [PMID: 25414349]

MeSH Term

Disease Outbreaks
Epidemiological Monitoring
Genome, Bacterial
Humans
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Norway
Phylogeny
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Staphylococcal Infections

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0protocoloutbreakanalysissequencingidentificationperdevelopedsurveillanceusingisolatesoutbreaksinvestigationrunisolateinvestigationsantibiotic-resistantbasedDNAmethicillin-resistantMRSAIlluminareal-timesixsuggestedSTpolishingphylogeneticidentifyconfirmablelessbacteriaOutbreakessentialcontrolpreventdisseminationpathogensstudyvalidatedcompletefasteraccuratemicrobesOxfordNanoporeTechnologiesONTwhole-genome42identifiedformerwell-characterizedvalidationperformedtechnologyMiSeqAdditionallyclinicalconductedtestONT-basedincludes:120 h2sequencetype3genomeassembly4draftgenomes5SNPspossible2 h20 minAssembliesachieved4 h40 mincarried7 min42 mintotaltook06 hOverallleastdiscard27 hmeanbacterial33 hestimatedtimescalculatedconsideringaveragetimetwo31 henablesearlystagesportablelow-costdevicealongstreamlineddownstreamthereforepotentialincorporatedroutineworkflowsadditionmayincludevirulenceantibioticresistancegenesimprovedpathogencharacterizationRapidnanopore-baseduseStaphylococcusaureusmultidrug-resistantnanopore-sequencing

Similar Articles

Cited By (20)