The COVID-19 vaccine social media : healthcare providers' missed dose in addressing misinformation and vaccine hesitancy.

Raquel G Hernandez, Loni Hagen, Kimberly Walker, Heather O'Leary, Cecile Lengacher
Author Information
  1. Raquel G Hernandez: Research and Education Bldg., Rm 3222, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
  2. Loni Hagen: College of Arts and Science, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
  3. Kimberly Walker: College of Arts and Science, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
  4. Heather O'Leary: College of Arts and Science, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
  5. Cecile Lengacher: College of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, antivaccination social media accounts are proliferating online, threatening to further escalate vaccine hesitancy related to the COVID-19 vaccine. This commentary seeks to alert and encourage the health care provider community, including health care professionals and academic organizations, to engage in social media to counter the mounting vaccine-related . To validate our recommendation for engagement, the authors describe preliminary findings using a mixed methods approach of quantitative Twitter-based ranking algorithms of networks and users with qualitative content analysis of 1 million tweets related to COVID-19 vaccine conversations. Results show highly polarized and active antivaccine conversations that were primarily influenced by political and nonmedical Twitter users. In contrast, less than 10% of the tweets stemmed from the medical community, demonstrating a lack of active health care professional connectivity in addressing COVID-19 misinformation. The authors introduce the concept of to refer to the public health threat of health care providers' nonaction in providing pro-vaccine and scientific information about the vaccine on social media. The authors conclude by describing multilevel strategies for encouraging health care providers and the medical community to effectively "Tweet up" to combat the mounting threat of vaccine misinformation and hesitancy.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2458-2459 [PMID: 32421155]
  2. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Oct;2(10):e504-e505 [PMID: 32984795]
  3. J Adolesc Health. 2017 Aug;61(2):246-251 [PMID: 28455129]
  4. AMA J Ethics. 2015 Nov 01;17(11):1009-18 [PMID: 26595241]
  5. P T. 2014 Jul;39(7):491-520 [PMID: 25083128]
  6. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Sep;140(9):956-7 [PMID: 27195434]
  7. Public Health Nurs. 2017 Jul;34(4):316-323 [PMID: 28261846]
  8. JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):223-224 [PMID: 33393964]

MeSH Term

COVID-19
COVID-19 Vaccines
Communication
Health Personnel
Humans
Pandemics
SARS-CoV-2
Social Media

Chemicals

COVID-19 Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccinehealthCOVID-19caresocialmediahesitancycommunityauthorsmisinformationrelatedmountinguserstweetsconversationsactivemedicalprofessionaladdressingthreatproviders'pandemicantivaccinationaccountsproliferatingonlinethreateningescalatecommentaryseeksalertencourageproviderincludingprofessionalsacademicorganizationsengagecountervaccine-relatedvalidaterecommendationengagementdescribepreliminaryfindingsusingmixedmethodsapproachquantitativeTwitter-basedrankingalgorithmsnetworksqualitativecontentanalysis1millionResultsshowhighlypolarizedantivaccineprimarilyinfluencedpoliticalnonmedicalTwittercontrastless10%stemmeddemonstratinglackconnectivityintroduceconceptreferpublicnonactionprovidingpro-vaccinescientificinformationconcludedescribingmultilevelstrategiesencouragingproviderseffectively"Tweetup"combat:healthcaremisseddoseSARS-CoV-2

Similar Articles

Cited By (62)