Evaluating the potential economic and health impact of rotavirus vaccination in 63 middle-income countries not eligible for Gavi funding: a modelling study.

Frédéric Debellut, Andrew Clark, Clint Pecenka, Jacqueline Tate, Ranju Baral, Colin Sanderson, Umesh Parashar, Deborah Atherly
Author Information
  1. Frédéric Debellut: Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: fdebellut@path.org.
  2. Andrew Clark: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  3. Clint Pecenka: Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
  4. Jacqueline Tate: Division of Viral Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  5. Ranju Baral: Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
  6. Colin Sanderson: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  7. Umesh Parashar: Division of Viral Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  8. Deborah Atherly: Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Middle-income countries (MICs) that are not eligible for funding from Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, have been slow to adopt rotavirus vaccines. Few studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness and benefit-risk of rotavirus vaccination in these settings. We aimed to assess the potential economic and health impact of rotavirus vaccination in 63 MICs not eligible for funding from Gavi.
METHODS: In this modelling study, we estimated the cost-effectiveness and benefit-risk of rotavirus vaccination in 63 MICs not eligible to Gavi funding. We used an Excel-based proportionate outcomes model with a finely disaggregated age structure to estimate the number of rotavirus gastroenteritis cases, clinic visits, hospitalisations, and deaths averted by vaccination in children younger than 5 years over a 10-year period. We calculated cost-effectiveness ratios (costs per disability-adjusted life-years averted compared with no vaccination) and benefit-risk ratios (number of hospitalisations due to rotavirus gastroenteritis averted per excess hospitalisations due to intussusception). We evaluated three alternative vaccines available globally (Rotarix, Rotavac, and Rotasiil) and used information from vaccine manufacturers regarding anticipated vaccine prices. We ran deterministic and probabilistic uncertainty analyses.
FINDINGS: Over the period 2020-29, rotavirus vaccines could avert 77 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 51-103) cases of rotavirus gastroenteritis and 21 million (12-36) clinic visits, 3 million (1·4-5·6) hospitalisations, and 37 900 (25 900-55 900) deaths due to rotavirus gastroenteritis in 63 MICs not eligible for Gavi support. From a government perspective, rotavirus vaccination would be cost-effective in 48 (77%) of 62 MICs considered. The benefit-risk ratio for hospitalisations prevented versus those potentially caused by vaccination exceeded 250:1 in all countries.
INTERPRETATION: In most MICs not eligible for Gavi funding, rotavirus vaccination has high probability to be cost-effective with a favourable benefit-risk profile. Policy makers should consider this new evidence when making or revisiting decisions on the use of rotavirus vaccines in their respective countries.
FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

References

  1. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 May;54(10):1397-405 [PMID: 22431803]
  2. Vaccine. 2019 Aug 14;37(35):4987-4995 [PMID: 31326252]
  3. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(11):2760-2767 [PMID: 29913110]
  4. Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1316-1326 [PMID: 30879038]
  5. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Dec 1;22 Suppl 5:S128-S135 [PMID: 27129416]
  6. Vaccine. 2017 Jun 8;35(26):3364-3386 [PMID: 28504193]
  7. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Nov;7(11):e1541-e1552 [PMID: 31607466]
  8. Lancet. 2009 May 2;373(9674):1543-9 [PMID: 19303633]
  9. J Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 5;217(6):861-868 [PMID: 29514306]
  10. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 22;344(8):564-72 [PMID: 11207352]
  11. PLoS One. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0228506 [PMID: 32023295]
  12. Vaccine. 2019 Jan 21;37(4):623-630 [PMID: 30587430]
  13. Nature. 2019 May;569(7756):309 [PMID: 31089234]
  14. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 12;7(4):ofaa087 [PMID: 32296726]
  15. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 30;69(6):1071-1078 [PMID: 30689799]
  16. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222 [PMID: 33069326]
  17. Vaccine. 2019 May 9;37(21):2838-2842 [PMID: 30979568]
  18. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e712-23 [PMID: 26475018]
  19. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Dec;7(12):e1664-e1674 [PMID: 31708147]
  20. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Jun;9(6):1272-88 [PMID: 23571226]
  21. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19;378(16):1521-1528 [PMID: 29669224]
  22. Vaccine. 2020 Feb 5;38(6):1277-1279 [PMID: 31859203]
  23. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013 Feb 1;88(5):49-64 [PMID: 23424730]
  24. Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):929-935 [PMID: 27987642]
  25. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1932-1940 [PMID: 33176083]
  26. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;19(7):717-727 [PMID: 31178289]
  27. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(6):1582-94 [PMID: 24861846]
  28. Vaccine. 2018 Dec 14;36(51):7769-7774 [PMID: 29107346]
  29. Vaccine. 2019 Feb 4;37(6):798-807 [PMID: 30639458]
  30. Vaccine. 2020 Feb 5;38(6):1352-1362 [PMID: 31870571]
  31. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 08;6(4):ofz117 [PMID: 31049363]
  32. BMC Public Health. 2020 May 5;20(1):619 [PMID: 32370763]

MeSH Term

Child, Preschool
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Developing Countries
Humans
Infant
Models, Theoretical
Risk Assessment
Rotavirus Infections
Rotavirus Vaccines
Vaccination

Chemicals

Rotavirus Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0rotavirusvaccinationMICseligibleGavibenefit-riskhospitalisationscountriesfundingvaccines63gastroenteritiscost-effectivenessavertedduemillionevaluatedpotentialeconomichealthimpactmodellingstudyusednumbercasesclinicvisitsdeathsperiodratiospervaccineuncertaintycost-effectiveBACKGROUND:Middle-incomeVaccineAllianceslowadoptstudiessettingsaimedassessMETHODS:estimatedExcel-basedproportionateoutcomesmodelfinelydisaggregatedagestructureestimatechildrenyounger5years10-yearcalculatedcostsdisability-adjustedlife-yearscomparedexcessintussusceptionthreealternativeavailablegloballyRotarixRotavacRotasiilinformationmanufacturersregardinganticipatedpricesrandeterministicprobabilisticanalysesFINDINGS:2020-29avert7795%interval[UI]51-1032112-3631·4-5·637 90025 900-55 900supportgovernmentperspective4877%62consideredratiopreventedversuspotentiallycausedexceeded250:1INTERPRETATION:highprobabilityfavourableprofilePolicymakersconsidernewevidencemakingrevisitingdecisionsuserespectiveFUNDING:Bill&MelindaGatesFoundationEvaluatingmiddle-incomefunding:

Similar Articles

Cited By