Cyber-ethnography of cannabis marketing on social media.

Marina C Jenkins, Lauren Kelly, Kole Binger, Megan A Moreno
Author Information
  1. Marina C Jenkins: Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2870 University Ave, Suite 200, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. mcjenkins@wisc.edu. ORCID
  2. Lauren Kelly: Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2870 University Ave, Suite 200, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
  3. Kole Binger: Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2870 University Ave, Suite 200, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
  4. Megan A Moreno: Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2870 University Ave, Suite 200, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 2012, several states have legalized non-medical cannabis, and cannabis businesses have used social media as a primary form of marketing. There are concerns that social media cannabis exposure may reach underage viewers. Our objective was to identify how cannabis businesses cultivate an online presence and exert influence that may reach youth.
METHODS: We chose a cyber-ethnographic approach to explore cannabis retailers on social media. We searched cannabis retailers with Facebook and Instagram presence from Alaska, Oregon, Colorado, and Washington, and identified 28 social media business profiles. One year of content was evaluated from each profile. In-depth, observational field notes were collected from researchers immersed in data collection on business profiles. Field notes were analyzed to uncover common themes associated with social media cannabis marketing.
RESULTS: A total of 14 businesses were evaluated across both Facebook and Instagram, resulting in 14 sets of combined field notes. A major theme was Normalization of Cannabis, involving both Broad Appeal and Specific Targeting.
CONCLUSIONS: It is concerning that Normalization of Cannabis by cannabis businesses may increase cannabis acceptability among youth. In a digital world where the majority of youth are spending time online, it is important for policymakers to examine additional restrictions for cannabis businesses marketing through social media.

Keywords

References

  1. J Public Health Policy. 2005 Sep;26(3):312-25 [PMID: 16167559]
  2. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e182242 [PMID: 30646364]
  3. J Health Commun. 2002 Jul-Sep;7(4):273-307 [PMID: 12356288]
  4. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010 Sep;29(5):525-30 [PMID: 20887576]
  5. Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Jul;25(4):749-54 [PMID: 25091632]
  6. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jul 01;164:64-70 [PMID: 27185160]
  7. J Adolesc Health. 2020 Feb;66(2):247-254 [PMID: 31708374]
  8. Tob Control. 1998 Summer;7(2):129-33 [PMID: 9789930]
  9. Pediatrics. 2010 Oct;126(4):791-9 [PMID: 20876181]
  10. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Aug;91:12-19 [PMID: 29910010]
  11. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 May;79(3):408-416 [PMID: 29885148]
  12. Addict Behav. 2010 Sep;35(9):826-33 [PMID: 20483200]
  13. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 Jul 2;13(1):23 [PMID: 29961426]
  14. Prev Sci. 2018 Feb;19(2):127-137 [PMID: 28681195]
  15. Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:245-254 [PMID: 31054880]
  16. J Subst Use. 2016;21(4):361-367 [PMID: 27212891]
  17. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 23;18(6):e104 [PMID: 27338761]
  18. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Nov 1;112(1-2):117-25 [PMID: 20598815]
  19. J Drug Issues. 2019 Apr;49(2):228-237 [PMID: 31341332]
  20. J Adolesc Health. 2018 Oct;63(4):377-378 [PMID: 30286896]
  21. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017 May;43(3):247-260 [PMID: 27292878]
  22. J Adolesc Health. 2006 Apr;38(4):376-84 [PMID: 16549298]
  23. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 May 1;174:192-200 [PMID: 28365173]
  24. Alcohol Alcohol. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):486-93 [PMID: 22532575]
  25. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Jan;37 Suppl 1:E404-13 [PMID: 23256927]

Grants

  1. R01 DA041641/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. R01DA041641/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Anthropology, Cultural
Cannabis
Commerce
Humans
Marketing
Social Media

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cannabismediasocialbusinessesmarketingmayyouthnotesCannabisreachonlinepresenceretailersFacebookInstagrambusinessprofilesevaluatedfield14NormalizationBACKGROUND:Since2012severalstateslegalizednon-medicalusedprimaryformconcernsexposureunderageviewersobjectiveidentifycultivateexertinfluenceMETHODS:chosecyber-ethnographicapproachexploresearchedAlaskaOregonColoradoWashingtonidentified28OneyearcontentprofileIn-depthobservationalcollectedresearchersimmerseddatacollectionFieldanalyzeduncovercommonthemesassociatedRESULTS:totalacrossresultingsetscombinedmajorthemeinvolvingBroadAppealSpecificTargetingCONCLUSIONS:concerningincreaseacceptabilityamongdigitalworldmajorityspendingtimeimportantpolicymakersexamineadditionalrestrictionsCyber-ethnographyAdolescenthealthEthnographyMarketingSocial

Similar Articles

Cited By