OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
PLoS biology
04, 2021;19 (4): e3001036.

Gender, diversity, and the responsible assessment of researchers.

Krishma Labib, Natalie Evans
Author Information
  1. Krishma Labib: Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Law, Ethics and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Natalie Evans: Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Law, Ethics and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
PMID: 33905411 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001036

Abstract

In response to the Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers, this Formal Comment argues that it is time to take gender and diversity considerations seriously in the pursuit of fostering research integrity; this requires acknowledging and reshaping the influence of research assessment criteria on researcher representation.

References

  1. Environ Eng Sci. 2017 Jan 1;34(1):51-61 [PMID: 28115824]
  2. Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7759):5 [PMID: 31160744]
  3. BMJ. 2020 Apr 20;369:m1548 [PMID: 32312785]
  4. PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 16;18(7):e3000737 [PMID: 32673304]
  5. Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2440-2454 [PMID: 31155275]
  6. Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):594-600 [PMID: 30739695]

MeSH Term

Hong Kong
Humans
Research Personnel
Journal Article Comment
Article has an altmetric score of 6

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchersdiversityresearchassessmentresponseHongKongPrinciplesassessingFormalCommentarguestimetakegenderconsiderationsseriouslypursuitfosteringintegrityrequiresacknowledgingreshapinginfluencecriteriaresearcherrepresentationGenderresponsible

Similar Articles

Cited By