Potentially inappropriate primary care prescribing in people with chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional analysis of a large population cohort.

Clare MacRae, Stewart Mercer, Bruce Guthrie
Author Information
  1. Clare MacRae: Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
  2. Stewart Mercer: Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
  3. Bruce Guthrie: Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many drugs should be avoided or require dose-adjustment in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Previous estimates of potentially inappropriate prescribing rates have been based on data on a limited number of drugs, and mainly in secondary care settings.
AIM: To determine the prevalence of contraindicated and potentially inappropriate primary care prescribing in a complete population of people with known CKD.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study of prescribing patterns in a complete geographical population of people with CKD, defined using laboratory data.
METHOD: Drugs were organised by British National Formulary advice - contraindicated drugs: 'avoid'; potentially high-risk (PHR) drugs: 'avoid if possible'; and dose-inappropriate (DI) drugs: 'dose exceeded recommended maximums'. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 60 ml/min/1.73 m for 3 months.
RESULTS: In total, 28 489 people with CKD were included in the analysis, of whom 70.1% had CKD stage 3a, 22.4% CKD stage 3b, 5.9% CKD stage 4, and 1.5% CKD stage 5. A total of 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.7 to 4.1) of people with CKD stages 3a-5 were prescribed 1 contraindicated drug, 24.3% (95% CI = 23.8 to 24.8) 1 PHR drug, and 15.2% (95% CI = 14.8 to 15.6) 1 DI drug. Contraindicated drugs differed in prevalence by CKD stage and were most commonly prescribed in CKD stage 4, with a prevalence of 36.0% (95% CI = 33.7 to 38.2). PHR drugs were commonly prescribed in all CKD stages, ranging from 19.4% (95% CI = 17.6 to 21.3) in CKD stage 4 to 25.1% (95% CI = 24.5 to 25.7) in CKD stage 3a. DI drugs were most commonly prescribed in CKD stage 4 (26.4%, 95% CI = 24.3 to 28.6).
CONCLUSION: Potentially inappropriate prescribing is common at all stages of CKD. Development and evaluation of interventions to improve prescribing safety in this high-risk population are needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 18;35(5):589-594 [PMID: 29529172]
  2. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Nov 1;72(21):1876-84 [PMID: 26490822]
  3. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 31;11(10):e0165757 [PMID: 27798708]
  4. JAMA. 2015 Aug 11;314(6):557-8 [PMID: 26023868]
  5. Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Oct;16(5):481-485 [PMID: 27697815]
  6. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):386-92 [PMID: 20922494]
  7. BJGP Open. 2018 Jul 11;2(3):bjgpopen18X101594 [PMID: 30564727]
  8. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jul;64(624):e448-55 [PMID: 24982498]
  9. Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):709-733 [PMID: 32061315]
  10. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1053-64 [PMID: 26981935]
  11. Drugs Aging. 2020 May;37(5):359-372 [PMID: 32056163]
  12. Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):260-72 [PMID: 23727169]
  13. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Sep;36(3):329-341 [PMID: 29956572]
  14. Postgrad Med J. 2013 May;89(1051):247-50 [PMID: 23417370]
  15. Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Mar;69(680):e190-e198 [PMID: 30745357]
  16. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Nov 23;3:17088 [PMID: 29168475]
  17. Lancet. 2017 Mar 25;389(10075):1238-1252 [PMID: 27887750]
  18. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;83(12):2821-2830 [PMID: 28701029]
  19. Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Apr;13(2):113-121 [PMID: 30262176]
  20. Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):e378-e387 [PMID: 29686132]
  21. Lancet. 2012 Jan 14;379(9811):165-80 [PMID: 21840587]
  22. Lancet. 2012 Mar 3;379(9818):815-22 [PMID: 22386035]
  23. BMJ. 2011 Jun 21;342:d3514 [PMID: 21693525]
  24. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Mar;31(3):525-35 [PMID: 25629794]
  25. J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 21;8(3): [PMID: 30901955]
  26. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 Mar;124(3):256-265 [PMID: 30328682]
  27. Kidney Int. 2018 Jun;93(6):1432-1441 [PMID: 29656901]

MeSH Term

Cross-Sectional Studies
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Inappropriate Prescribing
Primary Health Care
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CKDstageprescribing95%=CIdrugsinappropriatepeople341potentiallypopulationprescribed24chronickidneycareprevalencecontraindicateddrugs:PHRDI4%57stagesdrug86commonlydataprimarycompletedefinedhigh-risktotal28analysis1%3a9%1525PotentiallyBACKGROUND:Manyavoidedrequiredose-adjustmentdiseasePreviousestimatesratesbasedlimitednumbermainlysecondarysettingsAIM:determineknownDESIGNANDSETTING:Cross-sectionalstudypatternsgeographicalusinglaboratoryMETHOD:DrugsorganisedBritishNationalFormularyadvice-'avoid''avoidpossible'dose-inappropriate'doseexceededrecommendedmaximums'estimatedglomerularfiltrationrateeGFR60ml/min/173mmonthsRESULTS:489included70223b5%confidenceinterval[CI]3a-53%232%14Contraindicateddiffered360%33382ranging19172126CONCLUSION:commonDevelopmentevaluationinterventionsimprovesafetyneededdisease:cross-sectionallargecohortdiseasesepidemiologygeneralpracticerenalimpairment

Similar Articles

Cited By