Headspace, an Australian Youth Mental Health Network: Lessons for Canadian Mental Healthcare.

Jeffrey C L Looi, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai, Stephen R Kisely
Author Information
  1. Jeffrey C L Looi: Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, Australian National University Medical School, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  2. Stephen Allison: Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  3. Tarun Bastiampillai: Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  4. Stephen R Kisely: Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe political advocacy and scientific debate about headspace, a non-governmental organisational (NGO) substantially funded by the Australian federal government that has significantly impacted the youth mental healthcare landscape. Access Open Minds is a Canadian clinical research initiative for youth mental health partially based on headspace. Lessons from the Australian experience may thus prove useful for Canadian stakeholders.
METHOD: The Australian healthcare system, mental health policy and governance for youth mental healthcare are contextually described. The structure and promulgation of the headspace NGO is detailed, as a parallel provider of primary mental healthcare outside of existing public and private mental health services. A review of the existing research on the evaluation of headspace was conducted.
RESULTS: Headspace has expanded rapidly due to successful political advocacy on behalf of the youth early intervention model, with limited coordination in terms of governance, planning and implementation with existing mental health services. In spite of consuming considerable resources, there has been limited evidence of effectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: Canadians should be wary of large youth programs that operate outside mainstream mental healthcare because of similar dangers such as poor co-ordination with existing government-funded services, duplication of care, the substantial consumption of resources, and limited evaluation of outcomes. As Access Open Minds is a clinical research project, there is the opportunity for Canada to evaluate the efficacy of the model before further adoption by governments.

Keywords

References

  1. Australas Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;28(5):599 [PMID: 32772705]
  2. Australas Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;28(3):331-334 [PMID: 32436728]
  3. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;13(3):697-706 [PMID: 30556335]
  4. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;13(1):159-166 [PMID: 30311423]
  5. Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jul 1;69(7):838-839 [PMID: 29962315]
  6. Psychiatr Serv. 2018 May 1;69(5):555-561 [PMID: 29334880]
  7. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr;47(2):216-229 [PMID: 31342279]
  8. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;54(7):670-672 [PMID: 32489106]
  9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 27;19(1):257 [PMID: 31029109]
  10. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;53(11):1050-1051 [PMID: 31552751]
  11. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;13 Suppl 1:12-13 [PMID: 31243914]
  12. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 10;:4867420976861 [PMID: 33300364]
  13. Australas Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 22;:1039856220956472 [PMID: 32961105]
  14. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):273 [PMID: 31488144]
  15. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;55(4):425 [PMID: 33307722]
  16. Med J Aust. 2015 Jun 1;202(10):537-42 [PMID: 26021366]
  17. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;54(11):1059-1060 [PMID: 32838544]
  18. Med J Aust. 2014 Feb 3;200(2):108-11 [PMID: 24484115]
  19. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;13(5):1073-1082 [PMID: 30160372]
  20. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;49(10):861-2 [PMID: 26416914]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mentalyouthheadspacehealthcarehealthAustralianexistingNGOCanadianresearchservicesevaluationlimitedpoliticaladvocacyAccessOpenMindsclinicalLessonsgovernanceoutsideHeadspacemodelresourcesMentalOBJECTIVE:describescientificdebatenon-governmentalorganisationalsubstantiallyfundedfederalgovernmentsignificantlyimpactedlandscapeinitiativepartiallybasedexperiencemaythusproveusefulstakeholdersMETHOD:systempolicycontextuallydescribedstructurepromulgationdetailedparallelproviderprimarypublicprivatereviewconductedRESULTS:expandedrapidlyduesuccessfulbehalfearlyinterventioncoordinationtermsplanningimplementationspiteconsumingconsiderableevidenceeffectivenessCONCLUSIONS:Canadianswarylargeprogramsoperatemainstreamsimilardangerspoorco-ordinationgovernment-fundedduplicationcaresubstantialconsumptionoutcomesprojectopportunityCanadaevaluateefficacyadoptiongovernmentsYouthHealthNetwork:HealthcareAustralia

Similar Articles

Cited By