Effects of Self-Compassion Training on Work-Related Well-Being: A Systematic Review.

Yasuhiro Kotera, William Van Gordon
Author Information
  1. Yasuhiro Kotera: Human Sciences Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
  2. William Van Gordon: Human Sciences Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Self-compassion, sharing some commonalities with positive psychology 2.0 approaches, is associated with better mental health outcomes in diverse populations, including workers. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is heightened awareness of the importance of self-care for fostering mental health at work. However, evidence regarding the applications of self-compassion interventions in work-related contexts has not been systematically reviewed to date. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to synthesize and evaluate the utility of self-compassion interventions targeting work-related well-being, as well as assess the methodological quality of relevant studies. Eligible articles were identified from research databases including ProQuest, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The quality of non-randomized trials and randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Quality Assessment Table, respectively. The literature search yielded 3,387 titles from which ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All ten studies reported promising effects of self-compassion training for work-related well-being. The methodological quality of these studies was medium. All ten studies recruited workers in a caring field and were mostly conducted in Western countries. The Self-Compassion Scale or its short-form was used in almost all instances. Findings indicate that self-compassion training can improve self-compassion and other work-related well-being outcomes in working populations. However, in general, there is need for greater methodological quality in work-related self-compassion intervention studies to advance understanding regarding the applications and limitations of this technique in work contexts. Furthermore, future studies should focus on a broader range of employee groups, including non-caring professions as well as individuals working in non-Western countries.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Health Med. 2014;19(3):355-64 [PMID: 23767987]
  2. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  3. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 May;81:81-88 [PMID: 29518624]
  4. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Jul;152(7):700-4 [PMID: 9667544]
  5. Psychol Psychother. 2010 Jun;83(Pt 2):129-43 [PMID: 19785933]
  6. Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2340 [PMID: 30538656]
  7. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0132940 [PMID: 26193654]
  8. Occup Med (Lond). 2016 Aug;66(6):428-36 [PMID: 27048297]
  9. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2017 May 2;23(5):219-229 [PMID: 28548918]
  10. Front Psychol. 2019 May 21;10:1148 [PMID: 31164857]
  11. Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Apr;67(657):177-178 [PMID: 28360064]
  12. Explore (NY). 2017 Sep - Oct;13(5):319-326 [PMID: 28780213]
  13. Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jul;17(31):1-278 [PMID: 23886301]
  14. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 Mar;25(2):231-249 [PMID: 29168607]
  15. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2020 Nov-Dec;32(7-8):565-578 [PMID: 33016788]
  16. Brain Sci. 2019 Sep 23;9(10): [PMID: 31547489]
  17. J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12134 [PMID: 32529654]
  18. Curr Obes Rep. 2015 Mar;4(1):141-6 [PMID: 26627097]
  19. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2008;4(2):101-19 [PMID: 19042895]
  20. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 21;13(11):e0207261 [PMID: 30462717]
  21. Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):351-74 [PMID: 20438142]
  22. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0191332 [PMID: 29364935]
  23. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 21;9:2638 [PMID: 30622499]
  24. Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 09;8:1353 [PMID: 28848471]
  25. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5 [PMID: 21584907]
  26. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2001 Oct;72(4):275-82 [PMID: 11797327]
  27. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017 Apr;22(2):237-241 [PMID: 27055823]
  28. J Pers. 2009 Feb;77(1):23-50 [PMID: 19076996]
  29. Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Nov;62(604):e757-64 [PMID: 23211179]
  30. J Health Care Chaplain. 2014;20(3):95-108 [PMID: 24926896]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0self-compassionstudieswork-relatedmentalhealthwell-beingqualityincludingworkersworkmethodologicaltenoutcomespopulationsself-careHoweverregardingapplicationsinterventionscontextssystematicreviewwelltrialsScaletrainingcaringcountriesSelf-CompassionworkingprofessionsSelf-compassionsharingcommonalitiespositivepsychology20approachesassociatedbetterdiverseDueCOVID-19pandemicheightenedawarenessimportancefosteringevidencesystematicallyrevieweddateThereforeaimedsynthesizeevaluateutilitytargetingassessrelevantEligiblearticlesidentifiedresearchdatabasesProQuestPsycINFOScienceDirectGoogleScholarnon-randomizedrandomizedcontrolledassessedusingNewcastle-OttawaQualityAssessmentTablerespectivelyliteraturesearchyielded3387titlesmetinclusioncriteriareportedpromisingeffectsmediumrecruitedfieldmostlyconductedWesternshort-formusedalmostinstancesFindingsindicatecanimprovegeneralneedgreaterinterventionadvanceunderstandinglimitationstechniqueFurthermorefuturefocusbroaderrangeemployeegroupsnon-caringindividualsnon-WesternEffectsTrainingWork-RelatedWell-Being:SystematicReviewworkplace

Similar Articles

Cited By