Anti-Bacterial Properties of Cannabigerol Toward .

Muna Aqawi, Ronit Vogt Sionov, Ruth Gallily, Michael Friedman, Doron Steinberg
Author Information
  1. Muna Aqawi: Biofilm Research Laboratory, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Institute of Dental Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  2. Ronit Vogt Sionov: Biofilm Research Laboratory, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Institute of Dental Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  3. Ruth Gallily: The Lautenberg Center for General and Tumor Immunology, Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  4. Michael Friedman: School of Pharmacy, Institute for Drug Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  5. Doron Steinberg: Biofilm Research Laboratory, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Institute of Dental Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Abstract

() is a gram-positive facultatively anaerobic bacterium and the most common pathogen associated with tooth caries. The organism is acid tolerant and can undergo physiological adaptation to function effectively in acid environments such as carious dental plaque. Some cannabinoids have been found to have potent anti-microbial activity against gram-positive bacteria. One of these is the non-psychoactive, minor phytocannabinoid Cannabigerol (CBG). Here we show that CBG exhibits anti-bacterial activities against . CBG halts the proliferation of planktonic growing , which is affected by the initial cell density. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy showed that the CBG-treated bacteria become swollen with altered membrane structures. Transmission electron microscopy provided data showing that CBG treatment leads to intracellular accumulation of membrane structures. Nile red, DiOC2(3) and laurdan staining demonstrated that CBG alters the membrane properties, induces membrane hyperpolarization, and decreases the membrane fluidity. CBG-treated bacteria showed increased propidium iodide uptake and reduced calcein AM staining, suggesting that CBG increases the membrane permeability and reduces the metabolic activity. Furthermore, CBG prevented the drop in pH caused by the bacteria. In summary, we present here data showing the mechanisms by which CBG exerts its anti-bacterial effect against .

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet. 2007 Jan 6;369(9555):51-9 [PMID: 17208642]
  2. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 31;10(7):e0131941 [PMID: 26230333]
  3. APMIS. 2017 Apr;125(4):376-384 [PMID: 28407420]
  4. Biochem J. 2004 Jul 15;381(Pt 2):447-52 [PMID: 15109304]
  5. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011 Feb 18;405(3):422-7 [PMID: 21241661]
  6. Biomater Sci. 2020 Dec 15;8(24):6883-6889 [PMID: 32960197]
  7. Front Microbiol. 2020 May 07;11:858 [PMID: 32457724]
  8. Carcinogenesis. 2014 Dec;35(12):2787-97 [PMID: 25269802]
  9. Microbiol Spectr. 2019 Jan;7(1): [PMID: 30657107]
  10. Future Microbiol. 2010 Mar;5(3):403-17 [PMID: 20210551]
  11. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jul;52(7):2626-31 [PMID: 18316516]
  12. Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 25;7(1):1129 [PMID: 28442740]
  13. J Bacteriol. 1916 May;1(3):321-31 [PMID: 16558698]
  14. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;33(4):499-515 [PMID: 24154653]
  15. J Nat Prod. 2008 Aug;71(8):1427-30 [PMID: 18681481]
  16. Anal Biochem. 1987 Dec;167(2):228-34 [PMID: 3442318]
  17. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Apr;57(4):1134-8 [PMID: 1829347]
  18. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 23;20(14): [PMID: 31340580]
  19. Microbiol Spectr. 2018 Oct;6(5): [PMID: 30338752]
  20. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Feb;70(2):929-36 [PMID: 14766573]
  21. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Apr;111(4):280-5 [PMID: 24331852]
  22. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0116647 [PMID: 25635770]
  23. Front Pharmacol. 2018 Jun 21;9:632 [PMID: 29977202]
  24. ACS Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 13;6(3):338-346 [PMID: 32017534]
  25. J Clin Pharmacol. 1981 Aug-Sep;21(S1):283S-291S [PMID: 7298870]
  26. Commun Biol. 2021 Jan 19;4(1):7 [PMID: 33469147]
  27. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2021 Feb;376(2):204-212 [PMID: 33168643]
  28. Braz J Microbiol. 2008 Oct;39(4):648-51 [PMID: 24031282]
  29. Microbiol Rev. 1986 Dec;50(4):353-80 [PMID: 3540569]
  30. Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 16;7:159 [PMID: 26909074]
  31. Phytother Res. 2018 Mar;32(3):413-425 [PMID: 29193357]
  32. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Jul 13;9(7): [PMID: 32668669]
  33. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000 Aug 1;189(1):89-92 [PMID: 10913871]
  34. Bio Protoc. 2018 Oct 20;8(20):e3063 [PMID: 34532528]
  35. BMC Oral Health. 2016 May 11;16(1):54 [PMID: 27169524]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CBGmembranebacteriaCannabigerolgram-positivecariesaciddentalactivityanti-bacterialelectronmicroscopyshowedCBG-treatedstructuresdatashowingstainingfacultativelyanaerobicbacteriumcommonpathogenassociatedtoothorganismtolerantcanundergophysiologicaladaptationfunctioneffectivelyenvironmentscariousplaquecannabinoidsfoundpotentanti-microbialOnenon-psychoactiveminorphytocannabinoidshowexhibitsactivitieshaltsproliferationplanktonicgrowingaffectedinitialcelldensityHigh-resolutionscanningbecomeswollenalteredTransmissionprovidedtreatmentleadsintracellularaccumulationNileredDiOC23laurdandemonstratedalterspropertiesinduceshyperpolarizationdecreasesfluidityincreasedpropidiumiodideuptakereducedcalceinAMsuggestingincreasespermeabilityreducesmetabolicFurthermorepreventeddroppHcausedsummarypresentmechanismsexertseffectAnti-BacterialPropertiesTowardStreptococcusmutansbacteriostasisphytocannabinoids

Similar Articles

Cited By