Association of Stress-Related Factors With Anxiety Among Chinese Pregnant Participants in an Online Crisis Intervention During COVID-19 Epidemic.

Fangfang Shangguan, Ruoxi Wang, Xiao Quan, Chenhao Zhou, Chen Zhang, Wei Qian, Yongjie Zhou, Zhengkui Liu, Xiang Yang Zhang
Author Information
  1. Fangfang Shangguan: School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Bejing, China.
  2. Ruoxi Wang: School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  3. Xiao Quan: School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Bejing, China.
  4. Chenhao Zhou: School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Bejing, China.
  5. Chen Zhang: School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Bejing, China.
  6. Wei Qian: CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bejing, China.
  7. Yongjie Zhou: Shenzhen KangNing Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
  8. Zhengkui Liu: CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bejing, China.
  9. Xiang Yang Zhang: CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bejing, China.

Abstract

Previous systematic review indicated the prevalence of prenatal anxiety as 14-54%. Pregnant women are a high-risk population for COVID-19. However, the prevalence of anxiety symptoms and related factors is unknown in Chinese pregnant women during COVID-19 outbreak. To investigate the prevalence of anxiety symptoms and the related factors in Chinese pregnant women who were attending crisis intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data of this cross-sectional study were collected in about 2 months (February 28 to April 26, 2020). Data analysis was performed from April to May 2020. Participants completed a set of questionnaires via the Wechat Mini-program before starting the online self-help crisis intervention for COVID-19 epidemic. A total of 2,120 Chinese pregnant women who were attending a self-help crisis intervention participated in this study. A survey was developed to address possible stress-related factors in pregnant women during the COVID-19 outbreak, including demographic, socioeconomic, and pregnancy-related factors, as well as COVID-19 related factors. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale and the 10-item perceived stress scale were, respectively, employed to measure anxiety and stress-related factors. A total of 21.7% (459) of pregnant women reported at least mild anxiety (≥5 on the GAD-7 scale), and only 82 women reported moderate to severe anxiety (≥10 on the GAD-7 scale). Factors associated with at least mild anxiety included living in Hubei province ( = 1.68, = 1.32-2.13), nobody providing everyday life support ( = 1.81, = 1.18-2.77), pelvic pain or vaginal bleeding ( = 1.67, = 1.32-2.09), and higher perceived stress ( = 6.87, = 5.42-9.02). Having relatives or neighbors with a diagnosis of COVID-19 was not associated with anxiety ( > 0.05). Our findings indicate that evaluation and intervention for maternal and infant health are necessary in pregnant women with anxiety during COVID-19 epidemic, especially those with higher perceived stress, less everyday life support, or vaginal bleeding. Interactions among these related medical, social and psychological factors need to be investigated in future studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  2. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Apr 7;:1-2 [PMID: 32223477]
  3. J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 1;262:83-89 [PMID: 31715390]
  4. Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 15;26:e923767 [PMID: 32294078]
  5. Qual Life Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1775-1787 [PMID: 32112277]
  6. Early Hum Dev. 2020 May;144:105022 [PMID: 32220767]
  7. Trials. 2019 Dec 30;20(1):814 [PMID: 31888712]
  8. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020 Jun;23(3):361-369 [PMID: 31256258]
  9. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919940 [PMID: 31995213]
  10. Psychol Assess. 2015 Mar;27(1):90-101 [PMID: 25346996]
  11. BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):368 [PMID: 33596889]
  12. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 2;19(1):683 [PMID: 31375073]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 May 04;13(5): [PMID: 27153080]
  14. J Affect Disord. 2020 Jun 1;270:85-89 [PMID: 32275225]
  15. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;55(10):1323-1333 [PMID: 32146484]
  16. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Mar 16;8(1):e21 [PMID: 32185371]
  17. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;28(2):257-280 [PMID: 29948234]
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:110-117 [PMID: 28167339]
  19. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;50(2):247-254 [PMID: 27484256]
  20. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jun;249:96-97 [PMID: 32317197]
  21. BMC Psychol. 2013 Jun 19;1(1):9 [PMID: 25566361]
  22. Women Birth. 2014 Dec;27(4):e36-42 [PMID: 25240846]
  23. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96 [PMID: 6668417]
  24. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):95 [PMID: 33588794]
  25. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 25;21(1):80 [PMID: 33494723]
  26. BJOG. 2020 Aug;127(9):1065 [PMID: 32378299]
  27. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Feb 21;:1-7 [PMID: 33615968]
  28. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;35(4):371-379 [PMID: 31950373]
  29. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e031035 [PMID: 32047008]
  30. BJOG. 2020 Sep;127(10):1229-1240 [PMID: 32583536]
  31. World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):354-7 [PMID: 26407793]
  32. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 24;15(6):e0235248 [PMID: 32579597]
  33. BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e013413 [PMID: 28490549]
  34. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Dec;67(12):1803-1808 [PMID: 29256520]
  35. J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 1;264:115-122 [PMID: 32056740]
  36. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(5):364-369 [PMID: 32610334]
  37. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;216(2):181.e1-181.e7 [PMID: 27773714]
  38. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jul;99(7):823-829 [PMID: 32259279]
  39. Demography. 2019 Aug;56(4):1389-1425 [PMID: 31325150]
  40. J Perinat Med. 2020 Nov 26;48(9):965-970 [PMID: 32887191]
  41. J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 1;264:187-192 [PMID: 32056749]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0anxietyCOVID-19women=factorspregnant1interventionrelatedChinesecrisisscaleperceivedstressprevalenceoutbreakGAD-7vaginalbleedingprenatalPregnantsymptomsattendingstudy2April2020Participantsself-helpepidemictotalstress-relatedAnxietyreportedleastmildFactorsassociated32-2everydaylifesupportpelvicpainhigherPrevioussystematicreviewindicated14-54%high-riskpopulationHoweverunknowninvestigatepandemicdatacross-sectionalcollectedmonthsFebruary2826DataanalysisperformedMaycompletedsetquestionnairesviaWechatMini-programstartingonline120participatedsurveydevelopedaddresspossibleincludingdemographicsocioeconomicpregnancy-relatedwellGeneralizedDisorder-710-itemrespectivelyemployedmeasure217%459≥582moderatesevere≥10includedlivingHubeiprovince6813nobodyproviding8118-2776709687542-902relativesneighborsdiagnosis>005findingsindicateevaluationmaternalinfanthealthnecessaryespeciallylessInteractionsamongmedicalsocialpsychologicalneedinvestigatedfuturestudiesAssociationStress-RelatedAmongOnlineCrisisInterventionEpidemic

Similar Articles

Cited By