Relationship between coping/attachment styles and infertility-specific distress in Iranian infertile individuals: A cross-sectional study.

Forouzan Elyasi, Parisa Islami Parkoohi, Mahshid Naseri, Keshvar Samadaee Gelekolaee, Masoume Hamedi, Sepideh Peyvandi, Marzieh Azizi
Author Information
  1. Forouzan Elyasi: Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Center, Addiction Institute, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  2. Parisa Islami Parkoohi: Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Addiction Research Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  3. Mahshid Naseri: School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  4. Keshvar Samadaee Gelekolaee: Department of Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  5. Masoume Hamedi: IVF Ward, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  6. Sepideh Peyvandi: Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Center IVF Ward, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  7. Marzieh Azizi: Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infertility has been recognized as a stressful clinical condition, significantly affecting couples' emotional functioning.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between coping/attachment styles and infertility-specific distress (ISD) in infertile participants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Atotal number of 240 infertile participants (120 women and 120 men) who attend the Outpatient Infertility Clinic in Sari, Iran between February and October 2017 were selected using the convenience sampling method. Data were collected using a questionnaire addressing sociodemographic variables. In addition, coping and attachment styles were evaluated via the Coping Strategies Questionnaire and the Revised Adult Attachment Scale by Collins and Read (1990); respectively. Ultimately, the Infertility Distress Scale was used to assess ISD.
RESULTS: The mean ISD score was 42.53 9.63. Secure and insecure attachment styles were observed in 37.9% and 62.1% of the cases, respectively. There was a significant difference among ISD and different groups of attachment styles (p = 0.001) and emotion-focused coping style (p = 0.021). However, no significant relationship was found between problem-focused coping style and ISD (p = 0.985).
CONCLUSION: Considering the relationship between coping/attachment styles and ISD, it was recommended to implement stress prevention and coping education within the framework of coping/attachment theories for infertile individuals.

Keywords

References

  1. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1991 May-Jun;20(3):221-8 [PMID: 2056359]
  2. Fertil Steril. 2009 Feb;91(2):387-94 [PMID: 18281041]
  3. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Feb;13:19-24 [PMID: 27135049]
  4. Hum Reprod. 2012 Nov;27(11):3215-25 [PMID: 22926837]
  5. Psychol Health Med. 2016 Jun;21(4):476-482 [PMID: 26715422]
  6. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017 Apr;20(1):55-63 [PMID: 27778521]
  7. J Physiother. 2010;56(1):63 [PMID: 20500144]
  8. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Apr;38(3):229-40 [PMID: 8027962]
  9. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Dec;41(4):275-281 [PMID: 31902289]
  10. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Apr;58(4):644-63 [PMID: 14570079]
  11. J Reprod Infertil. 2013 Oct;14(4):202-6 [PMID: 24551575]
  12. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020 Aug;23(4):479-491 [PMID: 31897607]
  13. Electron Physician. 2017 Jun 25;9(6):4694-4702 [PMID: 28848650]
  14. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;130(3):253-6 [PMID: 26100348]
  15. Hum Reprod. 2009 Nov;24(11):2827-37 [PMID: 19666931]
  16. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jun;97(6):727-733 [PMID: 29350747]
  17. Int J Androl. 2008 Jun;31(3):303-14 [PMID: 17488339]
  18. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Mar;38(1):1-3 [PMID: 27750491]
  19. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019 Mar 03;17(1): [PMID: 31435585]
  20. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Sep 02;8(5):89-95 [PMID: 26652089]
  21. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2017 Jun;24(2):132-143 [PMID: 28536903]
  22. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 25;18(1):310 [PMID: 30253779]
  23. Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Sep 02;8(5):96-109 [PMID: 26652079]
  24. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Apr 26;13:37 [PMID: 25928197]
  25. Int J Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;6(1):37-44 [PMID: 25505510]
  26. Fertil Steril. 1999 Jul;72(1):54-62 [PMID: 10428148]
  27. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 25;28(2):86-94 [PMID: 27605864]
  28. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018 Apr;79(4):e12832 [PMID: 29528174]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stylesISDInfertilitycoping/attachmentinfertilecopingrelationshipattachmentp=0infertility-specificdistressparticipants120usingAttachmentScalerespectivelyDistresssignificantstyleBACKGROUND:recognizedstressfulclinicalconditionsignificantlyaffectingcouples'emotionalfunctioningOBJECTIVE:investigateMATERIALSANDMETHODS:Atotalnumber240womenmenattendOutpatientClinicSariIranFebruaryOctober2017selectedconveniencesamplingmethodDatacollectedquestionnaireaddressingsociodemographicvariablesadditionevaluatedviaCopingStrategiesQuestionnaireRevisedAdultCollinsRead1990UltimatelyusedassessRESULTS:meanscore4253963Secureinsecureobserved379%621%casesdifferenceamongdifferentgroups001emotion-focused021Howeverfoundproblem-focused985CONCLUSION:ConsideringrecommendedimplementstresspreventioneducationwithinframeworktheoriesindividualsRelationshipIranianindividuals:cross-sectionalstudyCopying

Similar Articles

Cited By