Development and validation of REAGERA-P, a new questionnaire to evaluate health care provider preparedness to identify and manage elder abuse.

Johanna Simmons, Marika Wenemark, Mikael Ludvigsson
Author Information
  1. Johanna Simmons: Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics in Linköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. johanna.simmons@liu.se. ORCID
  2. Marika Wenemark: Unit of Public Health and Statistics in Region Östergötland, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  3. Mikael Ludvigsson: Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics in Linköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elder abuse is prevalent and associated with morbidity but often goes unnoticed in health care. Research on the health care response to victims calls for valid measurements. This article describes the development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate health care provider preparedness to care for older adults subjected to abuse, the REAGERA-P (Responding to Elder Abuse in GERiAtric Care - Provider questionnaire).
METHOD: REAGERA-P was developed in phase I. The questionnaire includes a case vignette, self-efficacy scales for identifying and managing elder abuse cases and cause for concern as well as organizational barriers when talking with older patients about abuse. Content validity was ensured by a review committee, and cognitive interviews were conducted to ensure face validity and to examine cognitive processes to ensure comprehension. REAGERA-P was then administered to health care providers (n = 154, response rate 99 %) to test for construct validity. Factor analysis was performed, and internal consistency was tested for the self-efficacy scales. Convergent validity was tested by investigating associations between relevant variables. Some items were revised in phase II, and new cognitive interviews were performed. Parts of the questionnaire were tested for responsiveness by administering it to medical interns (n = 31, response rate 80 %) before and after an educational intervention.
RESULTS: REAGERA-P showed good content and face validity. The factor analysis revealed two factors: one for asking questions about abuse (Cronbach's α = 0.75) and one for managing the response to the questions (Cronbach's α = 0.87). Results suggest good convergent validity for the self-efficacy scales and for questions about cause for concern and organizational barriers. The responsiveness of the self-efficacy scales was good: the mean on the scale for asking questions (range 0-30) was 15.0 before the intervention and 21.5 afterwards, the mean on the scale for managing the response (range 0-50) was 22.4 before the intervention and 32.5 afterwards.
CONCLUSION: REAGERA-P is a new questionnaire that can be used to evaluate health care provider preparedness to identify and manage cases of elder abuse, including educational interventions conducted among staff to improve health care responses to victims of elder abuse. This initial testing of the questionnaire indicates that the REAGERA-P has good validity.

Keywords

References

  1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 May;61(5):679-85 [PMID: 23590291]
  2. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Oct;30(4):473-9 [PMID: 9326862]
  3. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010 Jul-Aug;51(1):86-91 [PMID: 19775762]
  4. J Interpers Violence. 2020 Dec 6;:886260520977836 [PMID: 33283603]
  5. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun;63(6):1214-38 [PMID: 26096395]
  6. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2011 Jul;23(3):213-33 [PMID: 27119527]
  7. BMJ. 2009 Jan 22;338:b155 [PMID: 19164392]
  8. J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(23-24):6041-6066 [PMID: 29294874]
  9. J Forensic Nurs. 2020 Oct/Dec;16(4):199-206 [PMID: 32925515]
  10. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2014;26(3):291-9 [PMID: 24779541]
  11. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009 Jan-Feb;48(1):110-5 [PMID: 18160115]
  12. Eur J Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;29(1):58-67 [PMID: 29878101]
  13. ISRN Nurs. 2011;2011:510692 [PMID: 22254143]
  14. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1947-56 [PMID: 26559573]
  15. Age Ageing. 2002 Sep;31(5):335-41 [PMID: 12242194]
  16. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Jul 10;:1524838019860616 [PMID: 31291837]
  17. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Dec 11;:1524838019889359 [PMID: 31823685]
  18. Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;14(4):549-555 [PMID: 30694436]
  19. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):151-9 [PMID: 16756520]
  20. Clin Nurs Res. 2012 Nov;21(4):450-66 [PMID: 22473275]
  21. Gerontology. 2013;59(5):464-72 [PMID: 23816799]
  22. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Feb;5(2):e147-e156 [PMID: 28104184]
  23. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 27;173(10):911-7 [PMID: 23567991]
  24. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2016 Jun-Jul;28(3):163-77 [PMID: 27149412]
  25. Scand J Caring Sci. 2001;15(3):244-9 [PMID: 11564232]
  26. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2012;24(1):17-36 [PMID: 22206510]
  27. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):72-83 [PMID: 32085693]
  28. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):199 [PMID: 32164695]
  29. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2020 Mar-May;32(2):173-195 [PMID: 32148186]
  30. Clin Nurs Res. 2018 May;27(4):497-515 [PMID: 27311304]
  31. BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Sep 02;16(1):36 [PMID: 27590310]
  32. Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;37(7):481-5 [PMID: 15988632]
  33. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;17(10):826-38 [PMID: 19916205]
  34. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):493-500 [PMID: 20398118]

Grants

  1. LIO-908641/Region Östergötland
  2. 3322/2017, 2944/2018, 3384/2019/Swedish Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority
  3. 3322/2017, 2944/2018, 3384/2019/Swedish Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority

MeSH Term

Aged
Elder Abuse
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Health Personnel
Humans
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0abusecarevalidityhealthquestionnaireREAGERA-Presponseself-efficacyscaleselderquestionsevaluateproviderpreparednessoldermanagingcognitivetestednewinterventiongoodEldervictimsdevelopmentvalidationadultsphasecasescauseconcernorganizationalbarriersinterviewsconductedensurefaceanalysisperformedresponsivenesseducationaloneaskingCronbach'sα = 0meanscalerange5afterwardsidentifymanageBACKGROUND:prevalentassociatedmorbidityoftengoesunnoticedResearchcallsvalidmeasurementsarticledescribessubjectedRespondingAbuseGERiAtricCare-ProviderMETHOD:developedincludescasevignetteidentifyingwelltalkingpatientsContentensuredreviewcommitteeexamineprocessescomprehensionadministeredprovidersn = 154rate99 %testconstructFactorinternalconsistencyConvergentinvestigatingassociationsrelevantvariablesitemsrevisedIIPartsadministeringmedicalinternsn = 31rate 80 %RESULTS:showedcontentfactorrevealedtwofactors:7587Resultssuggestconvergentgood:0-30150210-5022432CONCLUSION:canusedincludinginterventionsamongstaffimproveresponsesinitialtestingindicatesDevelopmentinstrumentintimatepartnerviolencemistreatmentneglect

Similar Articles

Cited By