Do Tissues Fixed in a Non-crosslinking Fixative Require a Dedicated Formalin-free Processor?

Sonia G Frasquilho, Ignacio Sanchez, Changyoung Yoo, Laurent Antunes, Camille Bellora, William Mathieson
Author Information
  1. Sonia G Frasquilho: Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
  2. Ignacio Sanchez: Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
  3. Changyoung Yoo: The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Laurent Antunes: Laboratoire National de Santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
  5. Camille Bellora: Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
  6. William Mathieson: Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Dudelange, Luxembourg.

Abstract

We evaluate the consequences of processing alcohol-fixed tissue in a processor previously used for formalin-fixed tissue. Biospecimens fixed in PAXgene Tissue Fixative were cut into three pieces then processed in a flushed tissue processor previously used for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks (neutral buffered formalin [NBF]), a formalin-free system (NBF), or left unprocessed. Histomorphology and immunohistochemistry were compared using hematoxylin/eosin staining and antibodies for MLH-1, Ki-67, and CK-7. Nucleic acid was extracted using the PAXgene Tissue RNA/DNA kits and an FFPE RNA extraction kit. RNA integrity was assessed using RNA integrity number (RIN), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (four amplicons), and quantitative RT-PCR (three genes). For DNA, multiplex PCR, quantitative PCR, DNA integrity number, and gel electrophoresis were used. Compared with NBF, RNA from NBF blocks had 88% lower yield and poorer purity; average RIN reduced from 5.0 to 3.8, amplicon length was 408 base pairs shorter, and Cq numbers were 1.9-2.4 higher. Using the FFPE extraction kit rescued yield and purity, but RIN further declined by 1.1 units. Differences between NBF and NBF in respect of DNA, histomorphology, and immunohistochemistry were either non-existent or small in magnitude. Formalin contamination of a tissue processor and its reagents therefore critically reduce RNA yield and integrity. We discuss the available options users can adopt to ameliorate this problem.

Keywords

References

  1. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2006 Sep;15(3):149-56 [PMID: 16932070]
  2. South Med J. 1985 Sep;78(9):1053-6 [PMID: 4035430]
  3. J Mol Diagn. 2012 Sep;14(5):458-66 [PMID: 22749745]
  4. Biopreserv Biobank. 2015 Oct;13(5):307-8 [PMID: 26484569]
  5. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2008 Dec;12(6):387-96 [PMID: 18995201]
  6. Biopreserv Biobank. 2015 Oct;13(5):325-34 [PMID: 26484572]
  7. Br J Cancer. 2006 Jan 30;94(2):333-7 [PMID: 16333309]
  8. J Proteome Res. 2010 Oct 1;9(10):5188-96 [PMID: 20812734]
  9. Am J Clin Pathol. 2018 Apr 25;149(6):536-547 [PMID: 29659661]
  10. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Jul;146(1):25-40 [PMID: 27402607]
  11. J Clin Pathol. 2013 Sep;66(9):807-10 [PMID: 23750036]
  12. Pathol Res Pract. 2016 Aug;212(8):678-85 [PMID: 27161306]
  13. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jan 31;18(2): [PMID: 28146134]
  14. Biopreserv Biobank. 2015 Oct;13(5):320-4 [PMID: 26418169]
  15. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;11(1):13-32 [PMID: 32745639]
  16. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Jan;42(1):103-115 [PMID: 28984675]
  17. Curr Eye Res. 2017 Jan;42(1):104-110 [PMID: 27409982]
  18. Genet Med. 2018 Oct;20(10):1196-1205 [PMID: 29388947]
  19. Biotech Histochem. 2018;93(5):373-386 [PMID: 30113239]
  20. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):189 [PMID: 31730447]
  21. J Urol. 1982 Mar;127(3):460-1 [PMID: 7062418]
  22. J Toxicol Pathol. 2018 Jul;31(3):213-220 [PMID: 30093792]
  23. Biopreserv Biobank. 2018 Jun;16(3):191-199 [PMID: 29723042]
  24. J Histochem Cytochem. 1985 Aug;33(8):845-53 [PMID: 3894502]
  25. Nature. 2007 Aug 23;448(7156):959-63 [PMID: 17713539]
  26. J Mol Diagn. 2007 Sep;9(4):441-51 [PMID: 17690213]
  27. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0236104 [PMID: 32776939]
  28. J Pathol Clin Res. 2020 Jan;6(1):40-54 [PMID: 31571426]
  29. J Forensic Sci. 2010 Jan;55(1):25-33 [PMID: 20015162]
  30. Cancer Genet. 2015 Sep;208(9):415-27 [PMID: 26194062]

MeSH Term

DNA
Fixatives
Formaldehyde
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA
Tissue Fixation

Chemicals

Fixatives
Formaldehyde
RNA
DNA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0NBFRNAintegritytissueprocessorusedFFPEusingRINDNAyield1previouslyformalin-fixedPAXgeneTissueFixativethreeblocksimmunohistochemistryextractionkitnumberRT-PCRquantitativePCRpurityevaluateconsequencesprocessingalcohol-fixedBiospecimensfixedcutpiecesprocessedflushedparaffin-embeddedneutralbufferedformalin[NBF]formalin-freesystemleftunprocessedHistomorphologycomparedhematoxylin/eosinstainingantibodiesMLH-1Ki-67CK-7NucleicacidextractedRNA/DNAkitsassessedreversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactionfourampliconsgenesmultiplexgelelectrophoresisCompared88%lowerpooreraveragereduced5038ampliconlength408basepairsshorterCqnumbers9-24higherUsingrescueddeclinedunitsDifferencesrespecthistomorphologyeithernon-existentsmallmagnitudeFormalincontaminationreagentsthereforecriticallyreducediscussavailableoptionsuserscanadoptameliorateproblemTissuesFixedNon-crosslinkingRequireDedicatedFormalin-freeProcessor?IlluminaPFPEScreenTapeXylenedegradationdegradefixativeformaldehydeparaffin

Similar Articles

Cited By