Comparison of changes in wound healing parameters following treatment with three topical wound care products using a laser wound model.

Qing Xu, Lingyue Shen, Xia Yang, Hao Peng, Ming Liu
Author Information
  1. Qing Xu: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200011, China.
  2. Lingyue Shen: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200011, China.
  3. Xia Yang: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200011, China.
  4. Hao Peng: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200011, China.
  5. Ming Liu: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200011, China.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study intended to analyze the differences in the efficacy of three topical wound care products on wound healing in patients undergoing surgery under the laser wound model.
METHOD: A total of 130 patients in the department of dermatology enrolled for retrospective analysis. These patients were divided into group A (n=43, Zihua Shaoshang Ruangao), group B (n=43, Shengji Yuhong Gao), and group C (n=44, Shirun Shaoshang Gao), respectively, according to the type of wound care product administrated. The efficacy was compared during one month of treatment.
RESULTS: There was little difference among groups A, B, and C in VAS score, FGF, EGF, and concentration of substance P (SP) at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days after surgery (>0.05), and a significant difference in these parameters among different time points was observed for intra-group comparison (<0.05). There was no significant difference in the symptom scores at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 days after surgery among the three groups (>0.05), while there was statistically significant difference at different time points in the same group (<0.05). The wound healing rates at 10, 20, and 30 days after surgery were 25.58%, 65.12%, and 95.35% in group A, 20.93%, 67.44%, and 100.00% in group B and 25.00%, 59.09%, and 97.73% in group C respectively (>0.05). The patients' satisfaction rate towards the appearance was 95.35% in group A, 97.67% in group B, and 97.73% in group C (>0.05).
CONCLUSION: The three kinds of wound care products, namely Zihua Shaoshang Ruangao, Shengji Yuhong Gao and Shirun Shaoshang Gao, exhibited good efficacy on the wound care of patients after dermatologic surgery. The wounds could be improved quickly, and patients were highly satisfied with the new appearance of the wound. Clinically, wound care products can be selected according to the stock of products in the hospital and patients' preferences.

Keywords

References

  1. Int Wound J. 2013 Dec;10(6):638-44 [PMID: 22905710]
  2. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;29(5):370-5 [PMID: 24409781]
  3. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:1654056 [PMID: 27200097]
  4. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Sep 30;7(9):e2423 [PMID: 31942391]
  5. J Dermatol Sci. 2018 Apr;90(1):3-12 [PMID: 29289417]
  6. Pharmacogn Mag. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(54):174-179 [PMID: 29720827]
  7. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Dec;79(12):1389-95 [PMID: 23860442]
  8. Am J Pathol. 2015 Jun;185(6):1638-48 [PMID: 25871534]
  9. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Oct;23(10):1187-90 [PMID: 19957836]
  10. Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Jul;33(5):1159-1169 [PMID: 29730821]
  11. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;41(12):1257-1262 [PMID: 29889137]
  12. J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Sep;133(9):e12 [PMID: 23949770]
  13. Tissue Cell. 2014 Apr;46(2):144-51 [PMID: 24576560]
  14. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):16-22 [PMID: 27657879]
  15. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2018 Dec 31;31(4):329-334 [PMID: 30983934]
  16. J Wound Care. 2018 Aug 2;27(8):504-511 [PMID: 30086249]
  17. J Immunol. 2017 Sep 1;199(5):1543-1552 [PMID: 28827386]
  18. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep;32(5):365-72 [PMID: 30066995]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0woundgroupcaresurgery05productspatientsthreehealingShaoshangBGaoCdifference>0efficacymodelamong10dayssignificantparameters202597topicallaserdermatologyn=43ZihuaRuangaoShengjiYuhongShirunrespectivelyaccordingtreatmentgroups15differenttimepoints<0309535%00%73%patients'appearancenursingPURPOSE:studyintendedanalyzedifferencesundergoingMETHOD:total130departmentenrolledretrospectiveanalysisdividedn=44typeproductadministratedcomparedonemonthRESULTS:littleVASscoreFGFEGFconcentrationsubstancePSP37observedintra-groupcomparisonsymptomscores15statisticallyrates58%6512%93%6744%1005909%satisfactionratetowards67%CONCLUSION:kindsnamelyexhibitedgooddermatologicwoundsimprovedquicklyhighlysatisfiednewClinicallycanselectedstockhospitalpreferencesComparisonchangesfollowingusingLaserointment

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)