A planetary boundaries perspective on the sustainability: resilience relationship in the Kenyan tea supply chain.

George Mutugu Mwangi, Stella Despoudi, Oscar Rodriguez Espindola, Konstantina Spanaki, Thanos Papadopoulos
Author Information
  1. George Mutugu Mwangi: Lotus Consulting, Nairobi, Kenya.
  2. Stella Despoudi: Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
  3. Oscar Rodriguez Espindola: Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
  4. Konstantina Spanaki: Loughborough School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
  5. Thanos Papadopoulos: Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. ORCID

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether agricultural supply chains (ASC) can be simultaneously sustainable and resilient to ecological disruptions, using the Planetary Boundaries theory. The nine different Planetary Boundaries i.e. climatic change, biodiversity loss, biogeochemical, ocean acidification, land use, freshwater availability, stratosphere ozone depletion, atmospheric aerosols and chemical pollution are examined in relation to ASC sustainability and resilience. Kenya's tea upstream supply chain sustainability and resilience from the ecological point of view is questioned. This study adopts a multi-case study analysis approach of nine producer organisations from Kenya's tea supply chain. The data from the in-depth semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion are analysed using thematic analysis. The Kenyan tea supply chain producers are not aware of all the nine planetary boundaries, although these impact on their resilience practices. They are engaged in pursuing both sustainability and resilience practices. They implement mainly environmental practices in relation to sustainability, while only a few of them are implementing resilience practices. The sustainability and resilience concepts were found to be interrelated, but resilience does not improve at the same pace as sustainability. It is suggested that the relationship between sustainability and resilience is non-linear. Limitations and future research avenues are also provided.

Keywords

References

  1. Foods. 2020 Apr 22;9(4): [PMID: 32331259]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 1;109(18):6868-72 [PMID: 22509032]
  3. Ecosyst Serv. 2020 Oct;45:101140 [PMID: 32834962]
  4. Ann Oper Res. 2022;319(1):1411-1431 [PMID: 32836614]
  5. Glob Food Sec. 2020 Sep;26:100422 [PMID: 32839686]
  6. Nurse Res. 2004 Sep 1;12(1):82-83 [PMID: 28718745]
  7. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 1;613-614:1275-1283 [PMID: 28962075]
  8. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2021 Apr;148:102271 [PMID: 33613082]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 2;112(22):6902-7 [PMID: 25964361]
  10. Ann Oper Res. 2022;319(1):1159-1196 [PMID: 32836615]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0resiliencesustainabilitysupplyteachainpracticesPlanetarynineboundariesASCecologicalusingBoundariesrelationKenya'sstudyanalysisKenyanplanetaryrelationshippurposepaperexaminewhetheragriculturalchainscansimultaneouslysustainableresilientdisruptionstheorydifferentieclimaticchangebiodiversitylossbiogeochemicaloceanacidificationlandusefreshwateravailabilitystratosphereozonedepletionatmosphericaerosolschemicalpollutionexaminedupstreampointviewquestionedadoptsmulti-caseapproachproducerorganisationsdatain-depthsemi-structuredinterviewsfocusgroupdiscussionanalysedthematicproducersawarealthoughimpactengagedpursuingimplementmainlyenvironmentalimplementingconceptsfoundinterrelatedimprovepacesuggestednon-linearLimitationsfutureresearchavenuesalsoprovidedperspectivesustainability:AgricultureProducersResilienceSustainability

Similar Articles

Cited By