Caesarean sections and health financing: a global analysis.

Ilir Hoxha, Günther Fink
Author Information
  1. Ilir Hoxha: Kolegji Heimerer, Pristina, Kosovo ilir.s.hoxha@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Günther Fink: Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to explore the association of health financing indicators with the proportion of births by caesarean section (CS) across countries.
DESIGN: Ecological cross-country study.
SETTING: This study examines CS proportions across 172 countries.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the percentage excess of CS proportion, defined as CS proportions above the global target of 19%. We also analysed continuous CS proportions, as well as excess proportion with a more restrictive 9% global target. Multivariable linear regressions were performed to test the association of health financing factors with the percentage excess proportions of CS. The health financing factors considered were total available health system resources (as percentage of gross domestic product), total contributions from private households (out-of-pocket, compulsory and voluntary health insurance contributions) and total national income.
RESULTS: We estimate that in 2018 there were a total of 8.8 million unnecessary CS globally, roughly two-thirds of which occurred in upper middle-income countries. Private health financing was positively associated with percentage excess CS proportion. In models adjusted for income and total health resources as well as human resources, each 10 per cent increase in out-of-pocket expenditure was associated with a 0.7 per cent increase in excess CS proportions. A 10 per cent increase in voluntary health insurance was associated with a 4 per cent increase in excess CS proportions.
CONCLUSIONS: We have found that health system finance features are associated with CS use across countries. Further monitoring of these indicators, within countries and between countries will be needed to understand the effect of financial arrangements in the provision of CS.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348 [PMID: 30322584]
  2. BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013670 [PMID: 28213600]
  3. BJOG. 2013 Oct;120(11):1356-65 [PMID: 23700966]
  4. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 9;19(1):206 [PMID: 31286892]
  5. BMJ. 2018 Jan 24;360:k55 [PMID: 29367432]
  6. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;21(2):98-113 [PMID: 17302638]
  7. PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 23;15(1):e1002494 [PMID: 29360829]
  8. Birth. 2006 Dec;33(4):270-7 [PMID: 17150064]
  9. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):625-629 [PMID: 19300326]
  10. N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 4;315(10):619-24 [PMID: 3736601]
  11. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 11;9(4):e026702 [PMID: 30975683]
  12. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0180846 [PMID: 28749944]
  13. Eur J Public Health. 2013 Jun;23(3):381-3 [PMID: 23204216]
  14. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148343 [PMID: 26849801]
  15. Lancet. 1985 Aug 24;2(8452):436-7 [PMID: 2863457]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 17;12(11):14690-708 [PMID: 26593932]
  17. CMAJ. 2001 Feb 6;164(3):337-9 [PMID: 11232133]
  18. J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Jan-Mar;31(1):24-31 [PMID: 18162792]
  19. JAMA. 2011 May 25;305(20):2096-104 [PMID: 21610242]
  20. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 May;96(5):607-616 [PMID: 28176334]
  21. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368 [PMID: 30322586]
  22. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;164(6 Pt 1):1441-4; discussion 1444-7 [PMID: 2048590]
  23. Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Dec;20(12):1657-73 [PMID: 26412496]
  24. Health Care Manag Sci. 2005 Feb;8(1):5-17 [PMID: 15782508]
  25. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jun;67(6):847-50 [PMID: 3703409]
  26. JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2263-70 [PMID: 26624825]
  27. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356 [PMID: 30833323]
  28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995 Aug;61(2):129-34 [PMID: 7556833]
  29. Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):365-404 [PMID: 8413067]
  30. Lancet. 2001 Oct 20;358(9290):1328-33 [PMID: 11684214]
  31. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4:CD004667 [PMID: 27121907]
  32. BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1397-400 [PMID: 10574855]
  33. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;206(4):331.e1-19 [PMID: 22464076]
  34. BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):606-9 [PMID: 25327984]
  35. Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):105-107 [PMID: 28077230]
  36. BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70 [PMID: 26681211]
  37. Perspect Biol Med. 2003 Winter;46(1):69-79 [PMID: 12582271]
  38. Reprod Health. 2015 Jun 21;12:57 [PMID: 26093498]
  39. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(7):811-24 [PMID: 7100999]
  40. Epidemiology. 2007 Jul;18(4):485-6 [PMID: 17568221]
  41. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;136(6):1170-1178 [PMID: 33156182]
  42. Am J Public Health. 1992 Feb;82(2):257-61 [PMID: 1739159]
  43. J Health Econ. 2009 Jan;28(1):244-50 [PMID: 19027184]
  44. Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2169-89 [PMID: 22594486]
  45. Eur J Public Health. 2005 Jun;15(3):288-95 [PMID: 15923214]
  46. Lancet. 2006 Oct 28;368(9546):1516-23 [PMID: 17071285]
  47. Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):974-5; author reply 975 [PMID: 11918936]
  48. Am J Public Health. 1990 Mar;80(3):313-5 [PMID: 2305912]
  49. Health Policy Plan. 1986 Mar;1(1):19-29 [PMID: 10283013]
  50. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016600 [PMID: 28827257]

MeSH Term

Cesarean Section
Female
Financing, Government
Global Health
Gross Domestic Product
Health Expenditures
Healthcare Financing
Humans
Insurance, Health
Pregnancy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthCScountriesproportionsexcesstotalfinancingproportionpercentageassociatedcentincreasestudyacrossglobalresourcesassociationindicatorstargetwellfactorssystemcontributionsout-of-pocketvoluntaryinsuranceincome10 perOBJECTIVES:objectiveexplorebirthscaesareansectionDESIGN:Ecologicalcross-countrySETTING:examines172MAINOUTCOMEMEASURES:primaryoutcomedefined19%alsoanalysedcontinuousrestrictive9%MultivariablelinearregressionsperformedtestconsideredavailablegrossdomesticproductprivatehouseholdscompulsorynationalRESULTS:estimate201888 millionunnecessarygloballyroughlytwo-thirdsoccurreduppermiddle-incomePrivatepositivelymodelsadjustedhumanexpenditure07 per4 perCONCLUSIONS:foundfinancefeaturesusemonitoringwithinwillneededunderstandeffectfinancialarrangementsprovisionCaesareansectionsfinancing:analysiseconomicsobstetricspublic

Similar Articles

Cited By