Crystal methamphetamine use in British Columbia, Canada: A cross-sectional study of people who access harm reduction services.

Kristi Papamihali, Dylan Collins, Mohammad Karamouzian, Roy Purssell, Brittany Graham, Jane Buxton
Author Information
  1. Kristi Papamihali: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ORCID
  2. Dylan Collins: Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  3. Mohammad Karamouzian: School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  4. Roy Purssell: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  5. Brittany Graham: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  6. Jane Buxton: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Increased use of Crystal methamphetamine ("crystal meth") has been observed across North America and international jurisdictions, including a notable increase in the presence of methamphetamines in illicit drug toxicity deaths in British Columbia (BC), Canada. We used data from a cross-sectional survey and urine toxicology screening to report the prevalence, correlates, and validity of self-reported crystal meth use among clients of Harm reduction sites in BC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survey data were collected from 1,107 participants across 25 communities in BC, through the 2018 and 2019 Harm Reduction Client Survey. We described reported substance use and used a multivariate logistic regression model to characterize crystal meth use. Urine samples provided by a subset of participants were used to derive validity of self-reported three-day crystal meth use compared to urine toxicology screening.
RESULTS: Excluding tobacco, crystal meth was the most frequently reported substance used in the past three days in 2018 and 2019 (59.7% and 71.7%, respectively). Smoking was the dominant route of administration for crystal meth, crack, heroin, and fentanyl. Multivariate analysis determined significantly higher odds of crystal meth use among those who used opioids (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 3.13), cannabis (AOR = 2.10), and alcohol (1.41), and among those who were not regularly housed (AOR = 2.08) and unemployed (AOR = 1.75). Age ���50 was inversely associated with crystal meth use (AOR = 0.63). Sensitivity of self-reported crystal meth use was 86%, specificity was 86%, positive predictive value was 96%, and negative predictive value was 65%.
CONCLUSIONS: crystal meth was the most commonly used substance among clients of Harm reduction sites in BC in 2018 and 2019, and was frequently used concurrently with opioids. Comparison to urine samples demonstrated high validity of self-reported crystal meth use. Understanding evolving patterns of substance use will be imperative in tailoring Harm reduction and substance use services for individuals that use crystal meth.

References

  1. Harm Reduct J. 2014 Apr 27;11:13 [PMID: 24766846]
  2. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107609 [PMID: 31654839]
  3. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Jan;83(1):66-76 [PMID: 18174009]
  4. Am J Addict. 2014 Jul-Aug;23(4):393-8 [PMID: 24628742]
  5. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003 Summer;15(3):317-25 [PMID: 12928507]
  6. J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Mar 1;41(1):36-45 [PMID: 29425315]
  7. Addiction. 2019 Feb;114(2):259-267 [PMID: 30276902]
  8. Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jun;110:41-8 [PMID: 24721446]
  9. PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0229208 [PMID: 32438390]
  10. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:14-20 [PMID: 30326396]
  11. CMAJ. 2013 Dec 10;185(18):1569-75 [PMID: 24130244]
  12. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Nov;39(7):932-940 [PMID: 32666650]
  13. Addict Behav. 2010 Apr;35(4):350-4 [PMID: 20053503]
  14. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008 May;27(3):270-6 [PMID: 18368608]
  15. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Mar;39(3):209-215 [PMID: 32202009]
  16. Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Jul 3;52(8):1051-1058 [PMID: 28323507]
  17. Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Aug;40(8):632-8 [PMID: 23859909]
  18. Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Mar;77:102665 [PMID: 31962283]
  19. Addiction. 2020 Feb;115(2):347-353 [PMID: 31503384]
  20. Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Jan;26(1):43-50 [PMID: 25304048]
  21. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(10):1351-9 [PMID: 26444185]
  22. Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Aug 24;53(10):1742-1755 [PMID: 29461134]
  23. CMAJ. 2008 Jun 3;178(12):1537-9 [PMID: 18519899]
  24. Addict Behav. 2006 Dec;31(12):2304-8 [PMID: 16564643]
  25. Addiction. 2006 Oct;101(10):1384-93 [PMID: 16968336]
  26. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Apr 1;185:322-327 [PMID: 29486421]
  27. J Urban Health. 2013 Apr;90(2):299-306 [PMID: 22689300]
  28. Am J Addict. 2009 May-Jun;18(3):248-9 [PMID: 19340644]
  29. AIDS Behav. 2008 Sep;12(5):705-12 [PMID: 17968649]
  30. Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;185:196-204 [PMID: 15339823]
  31. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192851 [PMID: 31026029]
  32. Addiction. 2007 Aug;102(8):1204-11 [PMID: 17565561]
  33. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jan 1;182:86-92 [PMID: 29175463]
  34. Public Health. 2008 Jan;122(1):70-8 [PMID: 17645904]
  35. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Mar;4(6):111 [PMID: 27127764]

Grants

  1. 170288/CIHR

MeSH Term

British Columbia
Canada
Cross-Sectional Studies
Methamphetamine
Multivariate Analysis
Tobacco Products

Chemicals

Methamphetamine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0usecrystalmethusedsubstance=BCself-reportedamongharmreductionAORurinevalidity120182019methamphetamineacrossBritishColumbiadatacross-sectionaltoxicologyscreeningclientssitesSurveyparticipantsreportedsamplesfrequently7%opioids286%predictivevalueCrystalservicesINTRODUCTION:Increased"crystalmeth"observedNorthAmericainternationaljurisdictionsincludingnotableincreasepresencemethamphetaminesillicitdrugtoxicitydeathsCanadasurveyreportprevalencecorrelatesMATERIALSANDMETHODS:collected10725communitiesHarmReductionClientdescribedmultivariatelogisticregressionmodelcharacterizeUrineprovidedsubsetderivethree-daycomparedRESULTS:Excludingtobaccopastthreedays5971respectivelySmokingdominantrouteadministrationcrackheroinfentanylMultivariateanalysisdeterminedsignificantlyhigheroddsAdjustedOddsRatio[AOR]313cannabis10alcohol41regularlyhoused08unemployed75Age���50inverselyassociated063Sensitivityspecificitypositive96%negative65%CONCLUSIONS:commonlyconcurrentlyComparisondemonstratedhighUnderstandingevolvingpatternswillimperativetailoringindividualsCanada:studypeopleaccess

Similar Articles

Cited By (22)