Development of a scale to measure reasons for eating less healthily after exercise: the compensatory unhealthy eating scale.

Natalie M Reily, Lenny R Vartanian, Kate Faasse
Author Information
  1. Natalie M Reily: School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  2. Lenny R Vartanian: School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  3. Kate Faasse: School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patterns of 'compensatory eating' following exercise are likely to be harmful for long-term health and counterproductive for weight loss goals. However, little is known about reasons why people eat unhealthily after exercising. Thus, we aimed to develop a measure that assesses reasons why people engage in compensatory unhealthy eating.
METHOD: A multi-stage approach using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used to develop and replicate a scale and validate its psychometric properties in three different samples. Participants (total  = 814) rated their agreement with statements capturing different reasons for eating less healthily after exercise.
RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed four distinct factors underlying compensatory eating: Reward for Effort, Permission to Consume, Need to Consume, and Reduced Self-Control. The resulting Compensatory Unhealthy Eating Scale (CUES) had good internal consistency and convergent validity.
CONCLUSION: The CUES has utility as a tool to assess compensatory eating behaviour. Further research should examine who is most likely to compensate and under what circumstances. Broadening current knowledge of compensatory eating after exercise may facilitate development of strategies to improve health behaviour regulation.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 2017 Mar 7;317(9):912-924 [PMID: 28267855]
  2. J Health Psychol. 2018 May;23(6):807-817 [PMID: 27402729]
  3. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;43(12):924-7 [PMID: 19793728]
  4. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Aug;45(8):1600-9 [PMID: 23470300]
  5. Physiol Behav. 2009 Apr 20;97(1):62-7 [PMID: 19419671]
  6. Nutr Rev. 2007 Jan;65(1):1-19 [PMID: 17310855]
  7. Appetite. 2014 Jan;72:8-12 [PMID: 24096084]
  8. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000 Aug;32(3):396-402 [PMID: 11029811]
  9. Behav Med. 2016;42(2):93-104 [PMID: 25148129]
  10. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD003817 [PMID: 17054187]
  11. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018 May 10;6(1):136-161 [PMID: 34040826]
  12. Appetite. 2011 Oct;57(2):435-8 [PMID: 21620913]
  13. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76 [PMID: 26828106]
  14. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jun;33(6 Suppl):S521-7; discussion S528-9 [PMID: 11427779]
  15. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(1):71-83 [PMID: 3981480]
  16. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005 Oct;33(4):169-74 [PMID: 16239833]
  17. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jun 9;163(11):1343-50 [PMID: 12796071]
  18. Br J Health Psychol. 2006 Feb;11(Pt 1):139-53 [PMID: 16480560]
  19. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Jun;15(6):1373-83 [PMID: 17557973]
  20. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2014 Mar;6(1):48-66 [PMID: 24259439]
  21. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95 [PMID: 12900694]
  22. Nutrition. 2014 Sep;30(9):1007-10 [PMID: 24976417]
  23. Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:323-329 [PMID: 27554186]
  24. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Apr;41(4):540-58 [PMID: 25716992]
  25. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Oct;114(10):1557-68 [PMID: 25257365]
  26. Psychometrika. 1965 Jun;30:179-85 [PMID: 14306381]
  27. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Jun;25(6):900-6 [PMID: 11439306]
  28. J Phys Act Health. 2015 Mar;12(3):322-7 [PMID: 24810009]
  29. Appetite. 2010 Apr;54(2):398-401 [PMID: 20043965]
  30. Psychol Sci. 2000 May;11(3):249-54 [PMID: 11273412]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0eatingcompensatoryexercisereasonsscalelikelyhealthweightlosspeopledevelopmeasureunhealthyanalysisdifferentlesshealthilyConsumeCompensatoryCUESbehaviourdevelopmentOBJECTIVE:Patterns'compensatoryeating'followingharmfullong-termcounterproductivegoalsHoweverlittleknowneatunhealthilyexercisingThusaimedassessesengageMETHOD:multi-stageapproachusingexploratoryconfirmatoryfactorusedreplicatevalidatepsychometricpropertiesthreesamplesParticipantstotal = 814ratedagreementstatementscapturingRESULTS:Factorrevealedfourdistinctfactorsunderlyingeating:RewardEffortPermissionNeedReducedSelf-ControlresultingUnhealthyEatingScalegoodinternalconsistencyconvergentvalidityCONCLUSION:utilitytoolassessresearchexaminecompensatecircumstancesBroadeningcurrentknowledgemayfacilitatestrategiesimproveregulationDevelopmentexercise:

Similar Articles

Cited By