Chemical Composition, Nutrient Quality and Acceptability of Edible Insects Are Affected by Species, Developmental Stage, Gender, Diet, and Processing Method.

Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow, Ruparao T Gahukar, Sampat Ghosh, Chuleui Jung
Author Information
  1. Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow: Department of Genetics and Ecology, Oulu University, SF-90140 Oulu, Finland. ORCID
  2. Ruparao T Gahukar: 103, Niyogi Bhavan, Abhyankar Marg, Dhantoli, Nagpur 4400012, Maharashtra, India.
  3. Sampat Ghosh: Agriculture Science and Technology Research Institute, Andong National University, Andong 36729, Gyeongsangbuk, Korea.
  4. Chuleui Jung: Agriculture Science and Technology Research Institute, Andong National University, Andong 36729, Gyeongsangbuk, Korea. ORCID

Abstract

Edible insects have been considered as either nutritious food itemsper se, or as wholesome ingredients to various dishes and components of traditional subsistence. Protein, fat, mineral and vitamin contents in insects generally satisfy the requirements of healthy food, although there is considerable variation associated with insect species, collection site, processing method, insect life stage, rearing technology and insect feed. A comparison of available data(based on dry weight) showed that processing can improve the nutrient content, taste, flavour, appearance and palatability of insects, but that there are additional factors, which can impact the content and composition of insect species that have been recommended for consumption by humans. This review focuses on factors that have received little attention in connection with the task to improve acceptability or choice of edible insects and suggests ways to guarantee food security in countries where deficiencies in protein and minerals are an acute and perpetual problem. This review is meant to assist the food industry to select the most suitable species as well as processing methods for insect-based food products.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 26;10(1):3471 [PMID: 32103047]
  2. Foods. 2020 Jul 03;9(7): [PMID: 32635164]
  3. Foods. 2019 Oct 18;8(10): [PMID: 31635354]
  4. Zoo Biol. 2011 Jan-Feb;30(1):9-16 [PMID: 21319208]
  5. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Mar;70(3):285-91 [PMID: 26373961]
  6. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017 Feb 21;243:103-107 [PMID: 27903420]
  7. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Jul 19;9:50 [PMID: 23866996]
  8. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Feb;20(2):967-75 [PMID: 22661279]
  9. J Insect Sci. 2019 Sep 1;19(5): [PMID: 31606745]
  10. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Feb;100:70-79 [PMID: 28007452]
  11. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017 Nov 16;261:11-18 [PMID: 28881263]
  12. Food Res Int. 2020 Mar;129:108831 [PMID: 32036901]
  13. Foods. 2020 Apr 16;9(4): [PMID: 32316132]
  14. Food Sci Technol Int. 2017 Sep;23(6):529-539 [PMID: 28429609]
  15. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011 May;145(1):11-20 [PMID: 21484757]
  16. Foods. 2020 May 04;9(5): [PMID: 32375385]
  17. Foods. 2021 Feb 14;10(2): [PMID: 33672798]
  18. Insects. 2017 Jul 21;8(3): [PMID: 28754025]
  19. J Insect Sci. 2019 Nov 1;19(6): [PMID: 31865367]
  20. Molecules. 2020 Jun 09;25(11): [PMID: 32527059]
  21. Nature. 2014 May 29;509(7502):633-6 [PMID: 24828047]
  22. J Food Sci. 2020 Mar;85(3):781-788 [PMID: 32017110]
  23. PLoS One. 2019 Jun 27;14(6):e0218830 [PMID: 31246993]
  24. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2013 Nov;12(6):662-678 [PMID: 33412718]
  25. Food Res Int. 2016 Nov;89(Pt 1):129-151 [PMID: 28460898]
  26. Ecol Food Nutr. 2011 Jul-Aug;50(4):351-67 [PMID: 21888601]
  27. Insects. 2020 May 05;11(5): [PMID: 32380684]
  28. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2019 Nov;112(6):518-528 [PMID: 31741488]
  29. J Food Sci. 2020 Jun;85(6):1621-1628 [PMID: 32460354]
  30. PeerJ. 2020 Feb 11;8:e8496 [PMID: 32095344]
  31. Insects. 2017 Sep 16;8(3): [PMID: 28926949]
  32. J Econ Entomol. 2002 Feb;95(1):214-20 [PMID: 11942759]
  33. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 Feb 8;13(1):13 [PMID: 28178988]
  34. Food Chem. 2016 Feb 15;193:39-46 [PMID: 26433285]
  35. Front Nutr. 2021 Feb 24;8:637385 [PMID: 33718420]
  36. J Food Sci. 2019 Nov;84(11):3222-3232 [PMID: 31600843]
  37. J Food Sci. 2017 Dec;82(12):2787-2793 [PMID: 29095501]
  38. Food Chem. 2019 Jan 30;272:267-272 [PMID: 30309543]
  39. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009 Aug;41(6):935-42 [PMID: 19067221]
  40. Food Res Int. 2018 Apr;106:666-676 [PMID: 29579973]
  41. Parasitol Res. 2005 Feb;95(3):179-85 [PMID: 15616857]
  42. Food Sci Nutr. 2019 Apr 22;7(5):1807-1815 [PMID: 31139394]
  43. Foods. 2020 Jul 27;9(8): [PMID: 32726913]
  44. J Insect Sci. 2019 Nov 1;19(6): [PMID: 31853552]
  45. Foods. 2020 Jan 02;9(1): [PMID: 31906597]
  46. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007 May;8(5):318-22 [PMID: 17542059]
  47. Food Chem. 2019 Dec 15;301:125305 [PMID: 31387042]
  48. J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Jan 2;50(1):192-5 [PMID: 11754566]
  49. J Hum Evol. 2014 Jun;71:4-11 [PMID: 24560030]
  50. Food Chem. 2013 Dec 15;141(4):3341-8 [PMID: 23993491]
  51. Food Sci Nutr. 2016 Apr 13;5(1):103-112 [PMID: 28070321]
  52. BMC Res Notes. 2018 Oct 1;11(1):687 [PMID: 30285897]
  53. Lab Anim Res. 2012 Jun;28(2):83-90 [PMID: 22787481]
  54. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2018 Jan;62(1): [PMID: 28654197]
  55. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 05;11(1):e0145914 [PMID: 26731419]
  56. J Insect Sci. 2014 Jan 26;14:14 [PMID: 25373161]
  57. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(2):276-298 [PMID: 28853909]
  58. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 Nov 13;13(1):60 [PMID: 29132398]
  59. Mol Immunol. 2018 Aug;100:82-106 [PMID: 29731166]
  60. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 May 12;14(5): [PMID: 28498340]
  61. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011 Jan 14;7:5 [PMID: 21235790]
  62. Foods. 2020 Mar 27;9(4): [PMID: 32230865]
  63. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013 May;57(5):802-23 [PMID: 23471778]
  64. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019 Jul;18(4):1166-1191 [PMID: 33336989]
  65. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2006 Jan;7(1):51-5 [PMID: 16365926]
  66. Chemosphere. 2015 Jun;128:171-7 [PMID: 25703900]
  67. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2011 Jan;81(1):49-56 [PMID: 22002218]
  68. Ecol Food Nutr. 2014 September-October;53(5):543-561 [PMID: 25105864]
  69. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 Feb 7;13(1):9 [PMID: 28173820]

Grants

  1. NRF-2018R1A6A1A03024862/National Research Foundation of Korea

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0insectfoodinsectsspeciesprocessingEdiblecanimprovecontentfactorsreviewacceptabilitysecurityconsideredeithernutritiousitemspersewholesomeingredientsvariousdishescomponentstraditionalsubsistenceProteinfatmineralvitamincontentsgenerallysatisfyrequirementshealthyalthoughconsiderablevariationassociatedcollectionsitemethodlifestagerearingtechnologyfeedcomparisonavailabledatabaseddryweightshowednutrienttasteflavourappearancepalatabilityadditionalimpactcompositionrecommendedconsumptionhumansfocusesreceivedlittleattentionconnectiontaskchoiceediblesuggestswaysguaranteecountriesdeficienciesproteinmineralsacuteperpetualproblemmeantassistindustryselectsuitablewellmethodsinsect-basedproductsChemicalCompositionNutrientQualityAcceptabilityInsectsAffectedSpeciesDevelopmentalStageGenderDietProcessingMethoddietentomophagydiversityedibilityfarmingnutrients

Similar Articles

Cited By (71)