OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience

Varieties of Artifacts: Embodied, Perceptual, Cognitive, and Affective.

Abstract

Keywords

References

1. Aagaard, J. (2021). 4E cognition and the dogma of harmony. Philosophical Psychology, 34(2), 165-181.
2. Alfano, M., Carter, A., & Cheong, M. (2018). Technological seduction and self-radicalisation. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 4(3), 298-322.
3. Alfano, M., Fard, A., Carter, A., Clutton, P., & Klein, C. (2020). Technologically scaffolded atypical cognition: The case of YouTube's recommender system. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02724-x
4. Andrada, G. (2020). Transparency and the phenomenology of extended cognition. Límite. Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy & Psychology, 15(12), 1-17.
5. Atkin, A. (2008). Icon, index, and symbol. In P. Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopaedia of language sciences (pp. 367-368). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Aristotle. (1984). Nichomachean ethics, metaphysics, physics. In J. Barnes, (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, Volumes I and II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Baber, C. (2003). Cognition and tool use: Forms of engagement in human and animal use of tools. London, England: Taylor and Francis.
8. Baber, C. (2018). Designing smart objects to support affording situations: Exploiting affordance through an understanding of forms of engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00292
9. Bach-y-Rita, P., & Kerel, S. (2003). Sensory substitution and the human-machine interface. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(12), 541-546.
10. Bell, G. M., & Gemmell, J. (2009). Total recall: How the e-memory revolution will change everything. New York: Dutton.
11. Bergson, H. (1911). Creative evolution. Translated by Arthur Mitchell, New York: Dover.
12. Brey, P. (2005). The epistemology and ontology of human-computer interaction. Minds and Machines, 15(3-4), 383-398.
13. Burr, C., Cristianini, N., & Ladyman, J. (2018). An analysis of the interaction between intelligent software agents and human users. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 735-774.
14. Carava, M., & Scorolli, C. (2020). When affective relation weighs more than the mug handle: Investigating affective affordances. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01928
15. Carter, A., Gordon, E., & Palermos, O. (2016). Extended emotion. Philosophical Psychology, 29(2), 198-217.
16. Casati, R. (2017). Two, then four modes of functioning of the mind: Towards a unification of “dual” theories of reasoning and theories of cognitive artifacts. In J. Zacks & H. Taylor (Eds.), Representations in mind and world (pp. 7-23). New York: Routledge.
17. Colombetti, G. (2020). Emoting the situated mind: A taxonomy of affective material scaffolds. JOLMA. The Journal for the Philosophy of Language, Mind and the Arts, 1(2), 215-236.
18. Colombetti, G., & Roberts, T. (2015). Extending the extended mind: The case for extended affectivity. Philosophical Studies, 172(5), 1243-1263.
19. Colombetti, G., & Krueger, J. (2015). Scaffoldings of the affective mind. Philosophical Psychology, 28, 1157-1176.
20. Colombetti, G., Krueger, J., & Roberts, T. (2018). Editorial: Affectivity beyond the skin. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01307/full
21. Clark, A. (2003). Natural born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
22. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 10-23.
24. Clancey, W. (2008). Scientific antecedents of situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 11-34). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Clowes, R. (2013). The cognitive integration of e-memory. Review of Philosophy & Psychology, 4(1), 107-133.
26. Crete-Nishihata, M., Baecker, R., Massimi, M., Ptak, D., Campigotto, R., Kaufman, L. D., Brickman, A. M., Turner, G. R., Steinerman, J. R., & Black, S. E. (2012). Reconstructing the past: Personal memory technologies are not just personal and not just for. Human-Computer Interaction, 27(1-2), 92-123.
27. De Cruz, H. (2008). An extended mind perspective on natural number representation. Philosophical Psychology, 21(4), 475-490.
28. Donald, M. (1991). The origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Downey, G. (2016). Sensory enculturation and neuroanthropology: The case of human echolocation. In J. Chiao, S. Li, R. Seligman, & R. Turner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cultural neuroscience (pp. 41-55). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30. Epstein, R. A., Patai, E. Z., Julian, J., & Spiers, H. (2017). The cognitive map in humans: Spatial navigation and beyond. Nature Neuroscience, 20(11), 1504-1513.
31. Fasoli, M. (2018a). Substitutive, complementary, and constitutive cognitive artifacts: Developing an interaction-centered approach. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(3), 671-687.
32. Fasoli, M. (2018b). Super artifacts: Personal devices as intrinsically multifunctional, meta-representational artifacts with a highly variable structure. Minds & Machines, 28, 589-604.
33. Fernandez, E. (2018). Development of visual neuroprostheses: Trends and challenges. Bioelectronic Medicine, 4(12), 1-8.
34. Finley, J. R., Naaz, F., & Goh, F. W. (2018). Memory and technology: How we use information in the brain and the world. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
35. Gallagher, S. (2006). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36. Gallagher, S. (2008). Philosophical antecedents of situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 35-51). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
38. Griffiths, P., & Scarantino, A. (2009). Emotions in the wild: The situated perspective on emotions. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 437-453). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149-181). London, England: Free Association Books.
40. Haugeland, J. (1991). Representational genera. In W. Ramsey, S. Stich, & D. Rumelhart (Eds.), Philosophy and connectionist theory (pp. 61-89). London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Heersmink, R. (2013a). A taxonomy of cognitive artifacts: Function, information, and categories. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 465-481.
42. Heersmink, R. (2013b). Embodied tools, cognitive tools and brain-computer interfaces. Neuroethics, 6(1), 207-219.
43. Heersmink, R. (2016). The metaphysics of cognitive artefacts. Philosophical Explorations, 19(1), 78-93.
44. Heersmink, R. (2018a). A virtue epistemology of the Internet: Search engines, intellectual virtues and education. Social Epistemology, 32(1), 1-12.
45. Heersmink, R. (2018b). The narrative self, distributed memory, and evocative objects. Philosophical Studies, 175(8), 1829-1849.
46. Heersmink, R. (2020a). Extended mind and artifactual autobiographical memory. Mind & Language. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12353
47. Heersmink, R. (2020b). Varieties of the extended self. Consciousness & Cognition, 85, 103001.
48. Heersmink, R., & Knight, S. (2018). Distributed learning: Educating and assessing extended minds. Philosophical Psychology, 31(6), 969-990.
49. Heersmink, R., & Sutton, J. (2020). Cognition and the Web: Extended, transactive, or scaffolded? Erkenntnis, 85(1), 139-164.
50. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. London, England: SCM.
51. Hernandez-Orallo, J., & Vold, K. (2019). AI extenders: The ethical and societal implications of humans cognitively extended by AI. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, and society ( 507-513). https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314238
52. Herr, H. (2019). How we become cyborgs and extend human potential. [Video file]. Available from https://www.ted.com/talks/hugh_herr_how_we_ll_become_cyborgs_and_extend_human_potential?language=en#t-628298
53. Hilpinen, R. (2011). Artifact. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artifact/
54. Hipolito, I., Clowes, R., & Gartner, K. (Eds.) (2021). The mind-technology problem: Investigating minds, selves and 21st century artefacts. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
55. Hodges, S., Williams, L., Berry, E., Izadi, S., Srinivasan, J., Butler, A., Smyth, G., Kapur, N., & Wood, K. (2006). SenseCam: A retrospective memory aid. In P. Dourish & A. Friday (Eds.), Ubicomp 2006: Ubiquitous computing (pp. 177-193). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
56. Holzhaider, J. C., Hunt, G. R., & Gray, R. D. (2010). Social learning in new Caledonian crows. Learning & Behavior, 38(3), 206-219.
57. Houkes, W., & Vermaas, P. (2010). Technical functions: On the use and design of artefacts. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
58. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Hutchins, E. (1999). Cognitive artifacts. In R. Wilson & F. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopaedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 126-128). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705-715.
61. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
62. Ihde, D., & Malafouris, L. (2019). Homo faber revisited: Postphenomenology and material engagement theory. Philosophy & Technology, 32(2), 195-214.
63. Kisely, S., Li, A., Warren, N., & Siskind, D. (2018). A systematic review and meta-analysis of deep brain stimulation for depression. Depression and Anxiety, 35, 468-480.
64. Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 1-52.
65. Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513-549.
66. Kramer, A., Guillory, J., & Hancock, J. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(24), 8788-8790.
67. Krueger, J., & Szanto, T. (2016). Extended emotions Extended emotions. Philosophy Compass, 11(12), 863-878.
68. Laland, K., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 131-175.
69. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
70. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1965). Phenomenology of perception. London, England: Routledge.
71. Miller, B., & Record, I. (2013). Justified belief in a digital age: On the epistemic implications of secret Internet technologies. Episteme, 10(2), 117-134.
72. Mittelstadt, B., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
73. Mueller, P.A., & Oppenheimer, D.M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159-1168.
74. Newen, A., De Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (Eds.) (2018). The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
75. Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141-161.
76. Nickerson, R. (2005). Technology and cognition amplification. In R. Steinberg & D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 3-27). London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77. Norman, D. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 17-38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
78. Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. New York: Basic Books.
79. Peirce, C. S. (1935a). The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce Vol 2. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
80. Peirce, C. S. (1935b). The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce Vol 3. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
81. Piredda, G. (2020). What is an affective artifact? A further development in situated affectivity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 549-567.
82. Piredda, G., & Di Francesco, M. (2020). Overcoming the past-endorsement criterion: Toward a transparency-based mark of the mental. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01278
83. Preston, B. (2013). A philosophy of material culture: Action, function, and mind. New York: Routledge.
84. Preston, B. (2018). Artifact. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artifact/
85. Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26, 325-352.
86. Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (Eds.). (2008). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
87. Saarinen, J. (2020). What can the concept of affective scaffolding do for us? Philosophical Psychology, 33(6), 820-839.
88. Scarantino, A., & de Sousa, R. (2018). Emotion. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/
89. Schettler, A., Raja, V., & Anderson, M. (2019). The embodiment of objects: Review, analysis, and future directions. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01332
90. Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. London, England: Penguin Books.
91. Simpson, D. (2012). Evaluating Google as an epistemic tool. Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 426-445.
92. Slaby, J. (2014). Emotions and the extended mind. In C. von Scheve & M. Salmella (Eds.), Collective emotions: Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology (pp. 32-46). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
93. Smart, P., Clowes, R., & Heersmink, R. (2017). Minds online: The interface between Web science, cognitive science, and the philosophy of mind. Foundations and Trends in Web Science, 6(1-2), 1-234.
94. Smart, P., Heersmink, R., & Clowes, R. (2017). The cognitive ecology of the Internet. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice. ( 2nd ed., pp. 251-282). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
95. Smart, P., & Shadbolt, N. (2018). The world wide web. In J. Chase & D. Coady (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied epistemology. New York: Routledge.
96. Solsman, J. (2018). YouTube's AI is the puppet master over most of what you watch. Available from https://www.cnet.com/news/youtube-ces-2018-neal-mohan/
97. Srinivasan, S., Diaz, M., Carty, M., & Herr, H. (2019). Towards functional restoration for persons with limb amputation: A dual-stage implementation of regenerative agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces. Scientific Reports, 9, 1981.
98. Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a hostile world: The evolution of human cognition. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
99. Sternberg, R., & Preiss, D. (Eds.) (2005). Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities. London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
100. Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189-225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
101. Sutton, J. (2016). Scaffolding memory: Themes, taxonomies, puzzles. In C. Stone & L. Bietti (Eds.), Contextualizing human memory: An interdisciplinary approach to understanding how individuals and groups remember the past (pp. 187-205). New York: Routledge.
102. Teunisse, W., Youssef, S., & Schmidt, M. (2019). Human enhancement through the lens of experimental and speculative neurotechnologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(4), 361-372.
103. Tribble, E., & Sutton, J. (2011). Cognitive ecology as a framework for Shakespearean studies. Shakespeare Studies, 39, 94-103.
104. Turkle, S. (Ed.). (2007). Evocative objects: Things we think with. Cambridge: MIT Press.
105. Turner, R. (2014). Programming languages as technical artifacts. Philosophy & Technology, 27(3), 377-397.
106. Yadav, D., Yadav, S., & Veer, K. (2020). A comprehensive assessment of brain computer interfaces: Recent trends and challenges. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 346, 108918.
107. Vaccari, A. (2016). Against cognitive artifacts: Extended cognition and the problem of defining ‘artifact’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16, 879-892.
108. Vaesen, K. (2012). The cognitive bases of human tool use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 203-218.
109. Van Dijck, J. (2013). ‘You have one identity’: Performing the self on Facebook and Linked In. Media, Culture & Society, 35(2), 199-215.
110. Viola, M. (2021). Three varieties of affective artifacts: Feeling, evaluative and motivational artifacts. Phenomenology and Mind.
111. Wheeler, M. (2019). The reappearing tool: Transparency, smart technology, and the extended mind. AI & Society, 34(4), 857-866).
112. Zanker, M., Rook, L., & Jannach, D. (2019). Measuring the impact of online personalisation: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 160-168.

MeSH Term