The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research.

Nathalie Percie du Sert, Viki Hurst, Amrita Ahluwalia, Sabina Alam, Marc T Avey, Monya Baker, William J Browne, Alejandra Clark, Innes C Cuthill, Ulrich Dirnagl, Michael Emerson, Paul Garner, Stephen T Holgate, David W Howells, Natasha A Karp, Stanley E Lazic, Katie Lidster, Catriona J MacCallum, Malcolm Macleod, Esther J Pearl, Ole H Petersen, Frances Rawle, Penny Reynolds, Kieron Rooney, Emily S Sena, Shai D Silberberg, Thomas Steckler, Hanno W��rbel
Author Information
  1. Nathalie Percie du Sert: Experimental Design and Reporting, NC3Rs, London, UK. ORCID
  2. Viki Hurst: Experimental Design and Reporting, NC3Rs, London, UK.
  3. Amrita Ahluwalia: William Harvey Research Institute, London, UK.
  4. Sabina Alam: Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK.
  5. Marc T Avey: ICF, Durham, North Carolina, USA. ORCID
  6. Monya Baker: Opinion, Nature, San Francisco, California, USA.
  7. William J Browne: School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  8. Alejandra Clark: Life Sciences, PLOS ONE, Cambridge, UK.
  9. Innes C Cuthill: School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  10. Ulrich Dirnagl: Quest Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany. ORCID
  11. Michael Emerson: National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  12. Paul Garner: Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Global Health, Clinical Sciences Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
  13. Stephen T Holgate: Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  14. David W Howells: Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. ORCID
  15. Natasha A Karp: Data Sciences & Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca PLC, Cambridge, UK.
  16. Stanley E Lazic: Prioris. ai, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  17. Katie Lidster: Animal Welfare, NC3Rs, London, UK.
  18. Catriona J MacCallum: Open Science, Hindawi Limited, London, UK.
  19. Malcolm Macleod: Academic Lead for Research Improvement and Research Integrity, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. ORCID
  20. Esther J Pearl: Experimental Design and Reporting, NC3Rs, London, UK. ORCID
  21. Ole H Petersen: Academia Europaea Knowledge Hub, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
  22. Frances Rawle: Policy, Ethics and Governance, Medical Research Council, London, UK.
  23. Penny Reynolds: Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  24. Kieron Rooney: Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  25. Emily S Sena: Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. ORCID
  26. Shai D Silberberg: Research Quality, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  27. Thomas Steckler: Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium. ORCID
  28. Hanno W��rbel: Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Abstract

Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into two sets, the 'ARRIVE Essential 10', which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the 'Recommended Set', which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2017 Sep 13;12(9):e0183591 [PMID: 28902887]
  2. PLoS Biol. 2016 May 12;14(5):e1002456 [PMID: 27171007]
  3. Sci Data. 2016 Mar 15;3:160018 [PMID: 26978244]
  4. Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Aug;160(7):1577-9 [PMID: 20649561]
  5. Vet Clin Pathol. 2012 Mar;41(1):27-31 [PMID: 22390425]
  6. Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3):e50-2 [PMID: 18703798]
  7. Nat Methods. 2013 May;10(5):367 [PMID: 23762900]
  8. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):94-9 [PMID: 21350617]
  9. PLoS Biol. 2015 Oct 13;13(10):e1002273 [PMID: 26460723]
  10. PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 14;18(7):e3000411 [PMID: 32663221]
  11. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011 Apr;31(4):991-3 [PMID: 21206507]
  12. BMJ Open Sci. 2019 Feb 26;3(1):e000035 [PMID: 35047682]
  13. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2008;9(1):4-15 [PMID: 18273714]
  14. Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):531-3 [PMID: 22460880]
  15. Circ Res. 2015 Jan 2;116(1):116-26 [PMID: 25552691]
  16. Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):267-76 [PMID: 24411647]
  17. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2011 Nov;50(6):901-3 [PMID: 22330784]
  18. J Med Ethics. 2009 Jan;35(1):74-8 [PMID: 19103950]
  19. JAMA. 2006 Oct 11;296(14):1731-2 [PMID: 17032985]
  20. J Gene Med. 2010 Jul;12(7):561-3 [PMID: 20607692]
  21. Nature. 2018 Sep;561(7721):17-18 [PMID: 30181639]
  22. PLoS One. 2009 Nov 30;4(11):e7824 [PMID: 19956596]
  23. Lab Anim. 2010 Oct;44(4):377-8 [PMID: 20660161]
  24. J Physiol. 2010 Jul 15;588(Pt 14):2519-21 [PMID: 20634180]
  25. Pain. 2008 Oct 15;139(2):243-247 [PMID: 18814968]
  26. Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):187-91 [PMID: 23060188]
  27. Br J Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;175(7):987-993 [PMID: 29520785]
  28. Mol Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;97(1):49-60 [PMID: 31882404]
  29. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jun 1;8(341):341ps12 [PMID: 27252173]
  30. Aust Vet J. 1995 Sep;72(9):322-8 [PMID: 8585846]
  31. PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 29;8(6):e1000412 [PMID: 20613859]
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2600-2606 [PMID: 29531091]
  33. Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Mar;45(5):627-628 [PMID: 28027598]
  34. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Jun 12;4:12 [PMID: 31205756]
  35. Circ Res. 2017 Jun 9;120(12):1916-1926 [PMID: 28373349]
  36. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7733):609-610 [PMID: 30482927]
  37. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 2;11(12):e0165999 [PMID: 27911901]
  38. PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 16;7(2):e1000217 [PMID: 20169112]
  39. Brain Behav. 2019 Jan;9(1):e01141 [PMID: 30506879]
  40. Am J Bioeth. 2009 Dec;9(12):55-9 [PMID: 20013503]
  41. PLoS Med. 2010 Mar 30;7(3):e1000245 [PMID: 20361020]
  42. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Apr;20(4):256-60 [PMID: 22424462]
  43. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Jun;13(2):147-57 [PMID: 17717729]
  44. Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Aug;160(7):1573-6 [PMID: 20649560]
  45. Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Jun 07;30(6):488-9 [PMID: 22678379]
  46. PLoS Biol. 2017 Sep 28;15(9):e2003779 [PMID: 28957312]
  47. PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197882 [PMID: 29795636]
  48. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 16;13(7):e0200303 [PMID: 30011289]
  49. PeerJ. 2017 Apr 25;5:e3208 [PMID: 28462024]
  50. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):e0166733 [PMID: 27855228]
  51. F1000Res. 2017 May 2;6:604 [PMID: 28620458]
  52. PLoS One. 2017 Apr 17;12(4):e0175583 [PMID: 28414751]

Grants

  1. G0800766/Medical Research Council
  2. NC3RS001/National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0guidelinesreportingresearchanimalARRIVE2developedimproveinformationpublicationsrigourupdateditemsjournaleditorsreviewersReproduciblesciencerequirestransparentAnimalResearch:ReportingVivoExperimentsoriginally2010consistchecklistincludedescribingvivoexperimentsenableothersscrutiniseworkadequatelyevaluatemethodologicalreproducemethodsresultsDespiteconsiderablelevelsendorsementfundersjournalsyearsadherenceinconsistentanticipatedimprovementsqualityachievedintroduce0reorganisedfacilitateusepracticeusedDelphiexerciseprioritisedividetwosets'ARRIVEEssential10'constitutesminimumrequirement'RecommendedSet'describescontextdivisionfacilitatesimprovedsupportingstepwiseapproachimplementationhelpsverifyimportantreportedmanuscriptsalsoaccompanyingExplanationElaborationdocumentserves1explainrationalebehinditemclarifykeyconcepts3provideillustrativeexamplesaimchangeshelpensureresearchersbetterequippedtransparencyscientificprocessthusreproducibility0:

Similar Articles

Cited By