Nonspecific Binding-Fundamental Concepts and Consequences for Biosensing Applications.

Andreas Frutiger, Alexander Tanno, Stephanie Hwu, Raphael F Tiefenauer, János Vörös, Nako Nakatsuka
Author Information
  1. Andreas Frutiger: Laboratory of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich CH-8092, Switzerland.
  2. Alexander Tanno: Laboratory of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich CH-8092, Switzerland.
  3. Stephanie Hwu: Laboratory of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich CH-8092, Switzerland.
  4. Raphael F Tiefenauer: Laboratory of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich CH-8092, Switzerland.
  5. János Vörös: Laboratory of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich CH-8092, Switzerland. ORCID
  6. Nako Nakatsuka: Laboratory of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich CH-8092, Switzerland. ORCID

Abstract

Nature achieves differentiation of specific and nonspecific binding in molecular interactions through precise control of biomolecules in space and time. Artificial systems such as biosensors that rely on distinguishing specific molecular binding events in a sea of nonspecific interactions have struggled to overcome this issue. Despite the numerous technological advancements in biosensor technologies, nonspecific binding has remained a critical bottleneck due to the lack of a fundamental understanding of the phenomenon. To date, the identity, cause, and influence of nonspecific binding remain topics of debate within the scientific community. In this review, we discuss the evolution of the concept of nonspecific binding over the past five decades based upon the thermodynamic, intermolecular, and structural perspectives to provide classification frameworks for biomolecular interactions. Further, we introduce various theoretical models that predict the expected behavior of biosensors in physiologically relevant environments to calculate the theoretical detection limit and to optimize sensor performance. We conclude by discussing existing practical approaches to tackle the nonspecific binding challenge for biosensing platforms and how we can both address and harness nonspecific interactions for systems.

MeSH Term

Animals
Biosensing Techniques
Humans

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nonspecificbindinginteractionsspecificmolecularsystemsbiosensorstheoreticalNatureachievesdifferentiationprecisecontrolbiomoleculesspacetimeArtificialrelydistinguishingeventsseastruggledovercomeissueDespitenumeroustechnologicaladvancementsbiosensortechnologiesremainedcriticalbottleneckduelackfundamentalunderstandingphenomenondateidentitycauseinfluenceremaintopicsdebatewithinscientificcommunityreviewdiscussevolutionconceptpastfivedecadesbaseduponthermodynamicintermolecularstructuralperspectivesprovideclassificationframeworksbiomolecularintroducevariousmodelspredictexpectedbehaviorphysiologicallyrelevantenvironmentscalculatedetectionlimitoptimizesensorperformanceconcludediscussingexistingpracticalapproachestacklechallengebiosensingplatformscanaddressharnessNonspecificBinding-FundamentalConceptsConsequencesBiosensingApplications

Similar Articles

Cited By