Executive function as measured by the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2: children and adolescents with Williams syndrome.

C Greiner de Magalhães, C H Pitts, C B Mervis
Author Information
  1. C Greiner de Magalhães: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. ORCID
  2. C H Pitts: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. ORCID
  3. C B Mervis: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Difficulties with executive functions (EF) are very common among individuals with Williams syndrome (WS). To characterise the pattern of relative strengths and weaknesses in EF for children and adolescents with WS, we considered the performance of a large sample on the parent version of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2 (BRIEF-2). Associations between distinct components of EF and adaptive behaviour, behaviour problems and intellectual ability were investigated. The concurrent effects of components of behaviour regulation and emotion regulation on attention problems and anxiety problems also were evaluated.
METHODS: Participants were 308 6-17-year-olds with genetically confirmed classic WS deletions. Parent report of EF was measured by the BRIEF-2 questionnaire. Most participants (223/308) completed the Differential Ability Scales-II as a measure of intellectual ability. The parents of these individuals also completed the Child Behavior Checklist and the interview form of the Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised.
RESULTS: As a group, the participants evidenced considerable parent-reported EF difficulty. A profile of relative strength and weakness was found at the index level, with performance on both the Behavior Regulation Index and the Emotion Regulation Index significantly better than performance on the Cognitive Regulation Index. Within each index, a statistically significant pattern of relative strength and weakness also was identified. Difficulties with behaviour regulation and emotion regulation were related to both behaviour problems and adaptive behaviour limitations. Higher inflexibility and more difficulty with self-monitoring were associated with lower overall intellectual ability. Difficulty with inhibition was uniquely associated with attention problems, and inflexibility was uniquely associated with anxiety problems.
CONCLUSIONS: Executive function difficulties are highly prevalent among children and adolescents with WS and are associated with adaptive behaviour limitations, both internalising and externalising behaviour problems and more limited intellectual ability. These results highlight the importance of designing and delivering research-based interventions to improve the EF of children and adolescents with WS.

Keywords

References

  1. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1996 Jan;37(1):51-87 [PMID: 8655658]
  2. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Jan;58(1):3-16 [PMID: 23902129]
  3. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Mar;48(3):796-808 [PMID: 29124472]
  4. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68 [PMID: 23020641]
  5. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 May;54(5):406-17 [PMID: 20537047]
  6. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010 May 15;154C(2):229-48 [PMID: 20425784]
  7. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Sep;58(9):830-7 [PMID: 24206083]
  8. Dev Neuropsychol. 2020 Mar-Apr;45(2):79-93 [PMID: 32063028]
  9. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 May;45(5):596-603 [PMID: 16670654]
  10. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Oct 20;9:264 [PMID: 26539087]
  11. Br J Dev Psychol. 2013 Jun;31(Pt 2):257-69 [PMID: 23659894]
  12. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):46-55 [PMID: 22940158]
  13. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Jun;46(6):2174-2185 [PMID: 26886469]
  14. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2006 Sep 5;141B(6):615-22 [PMID: 16823805]
  15. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Oct;24(9):905-916 [PMID: 30375321]
  16. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017 Mar;122(2):156-172 [PMID: 28257245]
  17. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 May;34(5):1770-80 [PMID: 23501586]
  18. Behav Res Ther. 1998 May;36(5):545-66 [PMID: 9648330]
  19. Nature. 2003 Jul 10;424(6945):157-64 [PMID: 12853948]
  20. Appl Neuropsychol. 2006;13(4):258-68 [PMID: 17362146]
  21. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 10;10(9):e0137628 [PMID: 26355600]
  22. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010 May 15;154C(2):277-90 [PMID: 20425787]
  23. Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec;59:80-92 [PMID: 27521717]
  24. Brain Sci. 2019 Jan 16;9(1): [PMID: 30654486]
  25. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Oct;60(10):1031-42 [PMID: 27545817]
  26. Autism. 2019 Jul;23(5):1273-1287 [PMID: 30400749]
  27. Child Neuropsychol. 2019 Jul;25(5):599-616 [PMID: 30111231]
  28. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202 [PMID: 11283309]

Grants

  1. R01 NS035102/NINDS NIH HHS
  2. R37 HD029957/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Child
Cognition
Executive Function
Humans
Inhibition, Psychological
Problem Behavior
Williams Syndrome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0behaviourproblemsEFWSBehaviorExecutiveintellectualchildrenadolescentsadaptiveabilityregulationassociatedWilliamssyndromerelativeperformanceRatingInventoryattentionalsoRegulationIndexfunctionDifficultiesexecutiveamongindividualspatternBRIEF-2componentsemotionanxietymeasuredparticipantscompleteddifficultystrengthweaknessindexlimitationsinflexibilityuniquelyBACKGROUND:functionscommoncharacterisestrengthsweaknessesconsideredlargesampleparentversionFunction-2AssociationsdistinctinvestigatedconcurrenteffectsevaluatedMETHODS:Participants3086-17-year-oldsgeneticallyconfirmedclassicdeletionsParentreportquestionnaire223/308DifferentialAbilityScales-IImeasureparentsChildChecklistinterviewformScalesIndependentBehavior-RevisedRESULTS:groupevidencedconsiderableparent-reportedprofilefoundlevelEmotionsignificantlybetterCognitiveWithinstatisticallysignificantidentifiedrelatedHigherself-monitoringloweroverallDifficultyinhibitionCONCLUSIONS:difficultieshighlyprevalentinternalisingexternalisinglimitedresultshighlightimportancedesigningdeliveringresearch-basedinterventionsimproveFunction-2:FunctionBRIEFdeficit/hyperactivitydisability

Similar Articles

Cited By