The Role of Cartridge-Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT), Line Probe Assay (LPA), Liquid Culture, Acid-Fast Bacilli (AFB) Smear and Histopathology in the Diagnosis of Osteoarticular Tuberculosis.

S Abhimanyu, Anil K Jain, V P Myneedu, Vinod K Arora, Manish Chadha, Rohit Sarin
Author Information
  1. S Abhimanyu: Department of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi, Delhi 110095 India.
  2. Anil K Jain: Department of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi, Delhi 110095 India.
  3. V P Myneedu: National Reference Laboratory and, Department of Microbiology, National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, New Delhi, Delhi 110030 India.
  4. Vinod K Arora: Department of Pathology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi, Delhi 110095 India.
  5. Manish Chadha: Department of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi, Delhi 110095 India.
  6. Rohit Sarin: National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi, Delhi 110030 India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the role of molecular methods in the diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis. The present study was conducted to define the role of molecular (CBNAAT, LPA), phenotypic (AFB smear and culture) and histopathological evaluation in the diagnosis of osteoarticular TB.
METHODS: Seventy-seven consecutive cases of osteoarticular tuberculosis were grouped into presumptive TB cases (group A) and presumptive drug-resistant cases (group B). Tissue samples obtained were submitted for CBNAAT, LPA, AFB smear, liquid culture and histological examinations. The diagnostic accuracy of each test was reported against histologically diagnosed cases and in all tests in tandem.
RESULTS: Group A and group B had 65 and 12 cases, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy for tuberculosis was 84.62% by CBNAAT, 70.77% by LPA, 86.15% by molecular tests (combined), 47.69% by AFB smear, 50.77% by liquid culture and 87.69% by histology in group A, and 91.67% for CBNAAT, 83.33% for LPA, 91.67% for molecular tests (combined), 25% for AFB smear, 16.67% for liquid culture and 83.33% for histology in group B. The drug resistance detection rate was 4.62% on CBNAAT, 3.08% on LPA, 6.15% on molecular tests (combined) and 1.54% on DST in group A, while it was 33.33% on CBNAAT, 58.33% on LPA, 58.33% on molecular tests (combined) and 16.67% on DST among group B cases. Similar sensitivity rates for the various tests were obtained among both the groups on comparison with histology (taken as denominator). The addition of molecular methods increased the overall diagnostic accuracy (all tests in tandem) from 93.8 to 100% in group A and from 83.3 to 100% in group B cases.
CONCLUSION: No single tests could diagnose tuberculosis in all cases; hence, samples should be evaluated by molecular tests (CBNAAT and LPA), AFB smear, culture and histological examinations simultaneously. The molecular tests have better demonstration of drug resistance from mycobacterial culture.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-020-00326-w.

Keywords

References

  1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975 Feb;57(1):13-23 [PMID: 46867]
  2. Acta Orthop Scand. 1974;45(1):36-42 [PMID: 4217554]
  3. Asian Spine J. 2016 Oct;10(5):850-856 [PMID: 27790312]
  4. Bone Joint J. 2014 Oct;96-B(10):1366-9 [PMID: 25274923]
  5. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018 Jun 20;7(1):109 [PMID: 29921972]
  6. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 22;12(8):e0182988 [PMID: 28829779]
  7. Int J Infect Dis. 2015 Jul;36:27-30 [PMID: 26004172]
  8. Indian J Orthop. 2008 Apr;42(2):173-7 [PMID: 19826523]
  9. Indian J Tuberc. 2018 Oct;65(4):296-302 [PMID: 30522616]
  10. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2017 Jan-Mar;6(1):87-93 [PMID: 28317811]
  11. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0169798 [PMID: 28081227]
  12. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009 Aug 30;3(7):511-6 [PMID: 19762969]
  13. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jun;8(6):1205-9 [PMID: 27293838]
  14. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2017 Jul-Sep;35(3):323-331 [PMID: 29063875]
  15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Jul;460:2-3 [PMID: 17620802]
  16. Asian Spine J. 2014 Feb;8(1):97-111 [PMID: 24596613]
  17. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jul;92(7):905-13 [PMID: 20595106]
  18. Indian J Orthop. 2018 Mar-Apr;52(2):100-107 [PMID: 29576636]
  19. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(5):440-54 [PMID: 22118251]
  20. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Nov;35(11):1165-1168 [PMID: 27286562]
  21. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jul;49(7):2540-5 [PMID: 21593262]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0testsmoleculartuberculosisgroupCBNAATLPAcasesAFBculturesmearB33%methodscombined67%osteoarticularliquiddiagnosticaccuracyhistology83rolediagnosisTBpresumptivedrug-resistantsamplesobtainedhistologicalexaminationstesttandem62%77%15%69%9116drugresistance3DST58among100%LineHistopathologyOsteoarticularPresumptiveBACKGROUND:paucitydatapresentstudyconducteddefinephenotypichistopathologicalevaluationMETHODS:Seventy-sevenconsecutivegroupedTissuesubmittedreportedhistologicallydiagnosedRESULTS:Group6512respectively84708647508725%detectionrate408%6154%33Similarsensitivityratesvariousgroupscomparisontakendenominatoradditionincreasedoverall938CONCLUSION:singlediagnosehenceevaluatedsimultaneouslybetterdemonstrationmycobacterialSUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION:onlineversioncontainssupplementarymaterialavailable101007/s43465-020-00326-wRoleCartridge-BasedNucleicAcidAmplificationTestProbeAssayLiquidCultureAcid-FastBacilliSmearDiagnosisTuberculosisCartridge-basednucleicacidamplificationprobeassayMoleculargenotypicMultidrug-resistantPhenotypicSpinal

Similar Articles

Cited By