A Dissociative Framework for Understanding Same-Different Conceptualization.

J David Smith, Barbara A Church
Author Information
  1. J David Smith: Language Research Center, Georgia State University.
  2. Barbara A Church: Language Research Center, Georgia State University.

Abstract

Cognitive, comparative, and developmental psychologists have long been interested in humans' and animals' ability to respond to abstract relations. Cross-species research has used relational matching-to-sample (RMTS) tasks in which participants try to find stimulus pairs that "match" because they express the same abstract relation (same or different). Researchers seek to understand the cognitive processes that underlie successful matching, and the cognitive constraints that create species differences in these tasks. Here we describe a dissociative framework drawn from cognitive neuroscience. It has strong potential to illuminate the area of same-different conceptualization. It has already influenced comparative research on categorization and metacognition. This dissociative framework also shows that species differences in same-different conceptualization have resonance with species differences in other comparative domains.

Keywords

References

  1. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Jun;3(3-4):319-27 [PMID: 8806033]
  2. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):458-75 [PMID: 22889164]
  3. Cereb Cortex. 2017 Apr 1;27(4):2652-2670 [PMID: 27130661]
  4. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):184-93 [PMID: 20384399]
  5. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):85-102 [PMID: 25365530]
  6. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):3-22 [PMID: 20141313]
  7. Learn Mem. 2019 Feb 15;26(3):84-92 [PMID: 30770465]
  8. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Mar;5(3):272-6 [PMID: 11850633]
  9. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1980 Oct;48(5):605-14 [PMID: 7410659]
  10. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Apr;35(2):129-42 [PMID: 19364222]
  11. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):322-35 [PMID: 26167774]
  12. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:25-42 [PMID: 2183676]
  13. Cogn Sci. 2014 Mar;38(2):383-97 [PMID: 24215433]
  14. Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):598-614 [PMID: 24076537]
  15. Anim Behav Cogn. 2019 Nov;6(4):236-246 [PMID: 33335976]
  16. J Comp Psychol. 2012 Aug;126(3):294-304 [PMID: 22023264]
  17. Mem Cognit. 2000 Oct;28(7):1205-12 [PMID: 11126942]
  18. Anim Cogn. 2013 Mar;16(2):241-54 [PMID: 23065186]
  19. Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(2):513-23 [PMID: 16045504]
  20. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1565-1584 [PMID: 28799092]
  21. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):54-65 [PMID: 20141317]
  22. Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Apr;31(2):109-30; discussion 130-178 [PMID: 18479531]
  23. Cognition. 2011 Jul;120(1):90-105 [PMID: 21459372]
  24. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Nov;36(10):2355-69 [PMID: 22981878]
  25. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):686-708 [PMID: 22250905]
  26. Science. 2014 Sep 26;345(6204):1616-20 [PMID: 25258080]
  27. Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):544-560 [PMID: 30632014]
  28. Cognition. 2019 Feb;183:256-268 [PMID: 30508704]
  29. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2002 Jun;2(2):149-61 [PMID: 12455682]
  30. J Comp Psychol. 2013 Nov;127(4):370-9 [PMID: 23772798]
  31. Psychol Rev. 2003 Apr;110(2):220-64 [PMID: 12747523]
  32. J Comp Psychol. 2018 Feb;132(1):58-74 [PMID: 29239647]
  33. Psychol Sci. 2011 Oct;22(10):1304-9 [PMID: 21934135]
  34. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Oct;23(4):491-501 [PMID: 9335136]
  35. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1297-309 [PMID: 22492748]
  36. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 02;10(9):e0137334 [PMID: 26332587]
  37. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):414-21 [PMID: 21327382]
  38. Mem Cognit. 2018 Feb;46(2):261-273 [PMID: 29019169]
  39. Cogn Psychol. 2017 Dec;99:17-43 [PMID: 29132016]
  40. Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):660-6 [PMID: 23508741]
  41. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Apr;1224:147-161 [PMID: 21182535]
  42. Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):447-57 [PMID: 24335605]
  43. J Comp Psychol. 2001 Mar;115(1):42-52 [PMID: 11334218]
  44. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Dec;14(6):1107-14 [PMID: 18229483]
  45. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Apr;34(2):266-82 [PMID: 18426309]
  46. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(2):107-123 [PMID: 31916780]

Grants

  1. R01 HD093690/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0comparativerelationalcognitivespeciesdifferencessame-differentabstractresearchtasksmatchingdissociativeframeworkconceptualizationcognitionCognitivedevelopmentalpsychologistslonginterestedhumans'animals'abilityrespondrelationsCross-speciesusedmatching-to-sampleRMTSparticipantstryfindstimuluspairs"match"expressrelationdifferentResearchersseekunderstandprocessesunderliesuccessfulconstraintscreatedescribedrawnneurosciencestrongpotentialilluminateareaalreadyinfluencedcategorizationmetacognitionalsoshowsresonancedomainsDissociativeFrameworkUnderstandingSame-DifferentConceptualizationanalogiesexplicitjudgments

Similar Articles

Cited By