SYMBALS: A Systematic Review Methodology Blending Active Learning and Snowballing.

Max van Haastrecht, Injy Sarhan, Bilge Yigit Ozkan, Matthieu Brinkhuis, Marco Spruit
Author Information
  1. Max van Haastrecht: Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  2. Injy Sarhan: Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  3. Bilge Yigit Ozkan: Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  4. Matthieu Brinkhuis: Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  5. Marco Spruit: Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Abstract

Research output has grown significantly in recent years, often making it difficult to see the forest for the trees. Systematic reviews are the natural scientific tool to provide clarity in these situations. However, they are protracted processes that require expertise to execute. These are problematic characteristics in a constantly changing environment. To solve these challenges, we introduce an innovative systematic review methodology: SYMBALS. SYMBALS blends the traditional method of backward snowballing with the machine learning method of active learning. We applied our methodology in a case study, demonstrating its ability to swiftly yield broad research coverage. We proved the validity of our method using a replication study, where SYMBALS was shown to accelerate title and abstract screening by a factor of 6. Additionally, four benchmarking experiments demonstrated the ability of our methodology to outperform the state-of-the-art systematic review methodology FAST.

Keywords

References

  1. Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 11;8(1):163 [PMID: 31296265]
  2. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Oct;51:242-53 [PMID: 24954015]
  3. Res Synth Methods. 2020 Mar;11(2):181-217 [PMID: 31614060]
  4. Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 18;8(1):143 [PMID: 31215463]
  5. BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 27;7(2):e012545 [PMID: 28242767]
  6. Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1 [PMID: 25554246]
  7. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210 [PMID: 27919275]
  8. Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 15;8(1):278 [PMID: 31727150]
  9. BMJ. 2001 Jan 13;322(7278):98-101 [PMID: 11154628]
  10. Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 17;5(1):140 [PMID: 27535658]
  11. Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 25;9(1):218 [PMID: 32977848]
  12. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):7 [PMID: 31931747]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningmethodologysystematicreviewSYMBALSmethodSystematicbackwardsnowballingmachineactivestudyabilityResearchoutputgrownsignificantlyrecentyearsoftenmakingdifficultseeforesttreesreviewsnaturalscientifictoolprovideclaritysituationsHoweverprotractedprocessesrequireexpertiseexecuteproblematiccharacteristicsconstantlychangingenvironmentsolvechallengesintroduceinnovativemethodology:blendstraditionalappliedcasedemonstratingswiftlyyieldbroadresearchcoverageprovedvalidityusingreplicationshownacceleratetitleabstractscreeningfactor6Additionallyfourbenchmarkingexperimentsdemonstratedoutperformstate-of-the-artFASTSYMBALS:ReviewMethodologyBlendingActiveLearningSnowballing

Similar Articles

Cited By (9)