Patient-Reported Outcomes Associated with Treatments for Testicular Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Sayeda Kamrun Naher, Orlando Rincones, Allan Ben Smith, Martin R Stockler
Author Information
  1. Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber: NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. ORCID
  2. Sayeda Kamrun Naher: NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
  3. Orlando Rincones: Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research & University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia. ORCID
  4. Allan Ben Smith: Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research & University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia. ORCID
  5. Martin R Stockler: NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Testicular cancer and its treatment can have major short- and long-term effects on the health-related quality of life of those affected. This systematic review aims to summarise patient-reported outcome (PRO) data concerning health-related quality of life, functional impacts and common side-effects of treatments for testicular cancer.
METHODS: We systematically searched Medline OVID, CINAHL, PubMed, Embase and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Over Time In Oncology (PROMOTION) databases from inception to 25 March 2020, using "testicular cancer" and "PRO" search terms developed in conjunction with a medical librarian. Two authors screened abstracts and full-text articles for studies that reported primary PRO data related to the treatment of testicular cancer including at least 50 participants. We excluded psychosocial data as this was included in our companion review. Data were extracted by three reviewers, and quality was assessed by two reviewers using QUAL-SYST. Studies with a quality of score over 65% were included in our narrative synthesis.
RESULTS: A total of 1831 records were identified via our database searches and 41 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 35 included participants who had chemotherapy. Twenty-eight different PRO measures were used across the 41 studies. Of the 41 studies, 29 had quality scores over 65% and were included in our narrative synthesis. We found that chemotherapy was generally associated with a higher side-effect burden than other treatments, and higher burden was associated with higher doses of chemotherapy. Hearing problems, peripheral neuropathy, and Raynaud's phenomena were particularly common side-effects. Problems with sexual functioning were associated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery.
DISCUSSION: While many studies found that between-treatment differences resolved within the first 12 months since diagnosis, there were many long-term and dose-dependent impacts associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy across PRO domains. Offering information about these aspects, and information about expected survival outcomes, will help inform, prepare, and empower patients to make decisions about treatment aligned with their preferences and personal situations.

Keywords

References

  1. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1993 Dec;11(4):267-75 [PMID: 8146511]
  2. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 1;20(1):73-80 [PMID: 11773156]
  3. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 20;30(3):300-7 [PMID: 22184390]
  4. J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 20;36(15):1505-1512 [PMID: 29617189]
  5. J Psychosom Res. 2011 May;70(5):403-10 [PMID: 21511070]
  6. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 15;19(6):1629-40 [PMID: 11250991]
  7. Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jul;28(7):3081-3091 [PMID: 31642990]
  8. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 15;6(6):e010938 [PMID: 27311907]
  9. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 15;21(6):1107-18 [PMID: 12637478]
  10. Qual Life Res. 2006 Jun;15(5):791-800 [PMID: 16721639]
  11. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Aug 18;102(16):1253-62 [PMID: 20631341]
  12. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):e510-e514 [PMID: 27769798]
  13. JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):483-494 [PMID: 29411037]
  14. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 1;32(28):3085-92 [PMID: 25024068]
  15. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(8):887-900 [PMID: 11284208]
  16. Laryngoscope. 2020 Sep;130(9):E515-E521 [PMID: 32065408]
  17. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  18. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 20;23(6):1200-8 [PMID: 15718317]
  19. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1513-23 [PMID: 12697875]
  20. Acta Oncol. 2012 Feb;51(2):185-97 [PMID: 21851186]
  21. Support Care Cancer. 1996 Mar;4(2):118-28 [PMID: 8673349]
  22. Radiother Oncol. 2001 Apr;59(1):13-20 [PMID: 11295201]
  23. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):e83-e96 [PMID: 32007209]
  24. J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 1;23(13):3061-8 [PMID: 15860864]
  25. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76 [PMID: 8433390]
  26. Cancer. 2010 May 15;116(10):2322-31 [PMID: 20225230]
  27. Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi125-32 [PMID: 24078656]
  28. J Urol. 1990 Aug;144(2 Pt 1):287-91; discussion 291-2 [PMID: 2165181]
  29. Br J Cancer. 2005 Jun 20;92(12):2107-13 [PMID: 15928672]
  30. Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1629-37 [PMID: 21499930]
  31. J Sex Med. 2015 Jan;12(1):210-8 [PMID: 25370897]
  32. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(37):e12390 [PMID: 30213007]
  33. BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):1104 [PMID: 30419889]
  34. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Oct 29;11:184 [PMID: 24168680]
  35. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5993-9 [PMID: 19858403]
  36. Urology. 2010 Mar;75(3):636-41 [PMID: 19963242]
  37. Isr Med Assoc J. 2018 Oct;20(10):642-644 [PMID: 30324783]
  38. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Sep;53(9):964-72 [PMID: 11004423]
  39. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83 [PMID: 1593914]
  40. Support Care Cancer. 2016 May;24(5):2243-2250 [PMID: 26576967]
  41. Cancer. 1997 Aug 1;80(3):454-64 [PMID: 9241079]
  42. J Transl Med. 2007 Dec 27;5:70 [PMID: 18162130]
  43. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 10;35(11):1211-1222 [PMID: 28240972]
  44. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Dec 16;101(24):1682-95 [PMID: 19940282]
  45. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):518-25 [PMID: 26620368]
  46. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 May;19(5):1151-9 [PMID: 20447912]
  47. Acta Oncol. 2018 Aug;57(8):1084-1093 [PMID: 29537330]
  48. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(4):571-8 [PMID: 22197218]
  49. J Urol. 2001 Jan;165(1):93-6 [PMID: 11125372]
  50. Qual Life Res. 1993 Feb;2(1):33-45 [PMID: 8490616]
  51. Int J Urol. 2004 Jul;11(7):542-6 [PMID: 15242365]
  52. Br J Cancer. 2005 Jul 25;93(2):200-7 [PMID: 15999104]
  53. Cancer Manag Res. 2021 May 11;13:3803-3816 [PMID: 34007213]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0qualitycancerchemotherapyPROstudiesincludedassociatedtreatmentlifedatatesticular41higherTesticularlong-termhealth-relatedreviewpatient-reportedimpactscommonside-effectstreatmentsPatient-ReportedOutcomesusingparticipantsreviewers65%narrativesynthesisacrossfoundburdenradiotherapymanyinformationoutcomesBACKGROUND:canmajorshort-effectsaffectedsystematicaimssummariseoutcomeconcerningfunctionalMETHODS:systematicallysearchedMedlineOVIDCINAHLPubMedEmbaseTimeOncologyPROMOTIONdatabasesinception25March2020"testicularcancer""PRO"searchtermsdevelopedconjunctionmedicallibrarianTwoauthorsscreenedabstractsfull-textarticlesreportedprimaryrelatedincludingleast50excludedpsychosocialcompanionDataextractedthreeassessedtwoQUAL-SYSTStudiesscoreRESULTS:total1831recordsidentifiedviadatabasesearchesmetinclusioncriteria35Twenty-eightdifferentmeasuresused29scoresgenerallyside-effectdosesHearingproblemsperipheralneuropathyRaynaud'sphenomenaparticularlyProblemssexualfunctioningsurgeryDISCUSSION:between-treatmentdifferencesresolvedwithinfirst12monthssincediagnosisdose-dependentdomainsOfferingaspectsexpectedsurvivalwillhelpinformprepareempowerpatientsmakedecisionsalignedpreferencespersonalsituationsAssociatedTreatmentsCancer:SystematicReviewsurvivorship

Similar Articles

Cited By