Does stress mess with rodents' heads? Influence of habitat amount and genetic factors in mandible fluctuating asymmetry in South American water rats (, Sigmodontinae) from Brazilian Atlantic rainforest remnants.

Aldo Caccavo, Hudson Lemos, Luana S Maroja, Pablo Rodrigues Gonçalves
Author Information
  1. Aldo Caccavo: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Conservação PPGCiAC - Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade NUPEM Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Macaé Brazil. ORCID
  2. Hudson Lemos: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Conservação PPGCiAC - Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade NUPEM Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Macaé Brazil. ORCID
  3. Luana S Maroja: Department of Biology Williams College Williamstown MA USA. ORCID
  4. Pablo Rodrigues Gonçalves: Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade NUPEM Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Macaé Brazil. ORCID

Abstract

Loss of developmental stability can lead to deviations from bilateral symmetry (i.e. Fluctuating Asymmetry - FA), and is thought to be caused by environmental and genetic factors associated with habitat loss and stress. Therefore, levels of FA might be a valuable tool to monitor wild populations if FA serves as an indicator of exposure to stress due to impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation. In studies examining FA and habitat fragmentation, FA levels are often explained by loss of genetic variation, though few studies have addressed FA's use as indicator of environmental impact. Here, we investigated whether habitat loss, genetic variation, and/or inbreeding affect the developmental instability in Brazilian Atlantic forest populations of a Neotropical water rat (). We sampled individuals from eight sites within Atlantic forest remnants with different amounts of available forest habitat and assessed FA levels with geometric morphometric techniques using adult mandibles. We used observed heterozygosity (H) and inbreeding coefficient (F), from seven microsatellite markers, as a proxy of genetic variation at individual and population levels. Populations were not significantly different for shape or size FA levels. Furthermore, interindividual variation in both shape and size FA levels and interpopulational differences in size FA levels were best explained by chance. However, habitat amount was negatively associated with both interpopulational variance and average shape FA levels. This association was stronger in populations living in areas with <28% of forest cover, which presented higher variance and higher average FA, suggesting that might have a tolerance threshold to small availability of habitat. Our work is one of the first to use FA to address environmental stress caused by habitat loss in small mammal populations from a Neotropical biome. We suggest that shape FA might serve as a conservation tool to monitor human impact on natural animal populations.

Keywords

Associated Data

Dryad | 10.5061/dryad.dz08kprwq

References

  1. Chemosphere. 2013 Oct;93(6):916-23 [PMID: 23800592]
  2. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2013 Jan-Feb;55(1):45-50 [PMID: 23328725]
  3. Science. 2014 Aug 29;345(6200):1041-5 [PMID: 25170150]
  4. Braz J Biol. 2009 May;69(2):305-9 [PMID: 19675931]
  5. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):331-6 [PMID: 8056320]
  6. Trends Ecol Evol. 1990 Mar;5(3):97-8 [PMID: 21232332]
  7. Heredity (Edinb). 2006 Feb;96(2):122-7 [PMID: 16333301]
  8. Ecol Evol. 2021 May 02;11(11):7080-7092 [PMID: 34141277]
  9. Evol Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;5(5):522-31 [PMID: 12950630]
  10. Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Aug;83 ( Pt 2):206-18 [PMID: 10469209]
  11. Biometrics. 1992 Jun;48(2):361-72 [PMID: 1637966]
  12. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006 Sep;101 Suppl 1:111-7 [PMID: 17308757]
  13. J Morphol. 2013 Jul;274(7):779-92 [PMID: 23450688]
  14. J Evol Biol. 2008 Mar;21(2):636-41 [PMID: 18194233]
  15. Genetics. 1988 Sep;120(1):213-20 [PMID: 17246476]
  16. Biodivers Conserv. 2010;19(12):3513-3524 [PMID: 32214695]
  17. Evolution. 1998 Oct;52(5):1363-1375 [PMID: 28565401]
  18. Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Apr;187(4):201 [PMID: 25800370]
  19. J Anim Ecol. 2011 Jan;80(1):19-38 [PMID: 20735792]
  20. Mol Ecol. 2000 Dec;9(12):2172-3 [PMID: 11123638]
  21. Heredity (Edinb). 1996 Apr;76 ( Pt 4):377-83 [PMID: 8626222]
  22. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):103-6 [PMID: 21585727]
  23. Evolution. 1999 Apr;53(2):358-375 [PMID: 28565420]
  24. J Environ Radioact. 2004;73(1):1-20 [PMID: 15001292]
  25. Nature. 1959 Jun 13;183(4676):1654-5 [PMID: 13666847]
  26. J Helminthol. 2002 Jun;76(2):103-13 [PMID: 12015821]
  27. Syst Biol. 2005 Aug;54(4):678-88 [PMID: 16126663]
  28. Heredity (Edinb). 1992 Apr;68 ( Pt 4):361-4 [PMID: 1563968]
  29. Am Nat. 2015 Jan;185(1):44-58 [PMID: 25560552]
  30. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):564-7 [PMID: 21565059]
  31. Ecol Lett. 2020 Apr;23(4):674-681 [PMID: 32043741]
  32. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 04;8(12):e82369 [PMID: 24324776]
  33. Heredity (Edinb). 2007 Jun;98(6):392-400 [PMID: 17375126]
  34. Malar J. 2017 Oct 30;16(1):437 [PMID: 29084553]
  35. Sci Adv. 2015 Mar 20;1(2):e1500052 [PMID: 26601154]
  36. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0122412 [PMID: 25874364]
  37. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 27;5(10):e13666 [PMID: 21060870]
  38. Braz J Biol. 2008 Nov;68(4):771-9 [PMID: 19197494]
  39. Parasitology. 2000 Jun;120 ( Pt 6):573-82 [PMID: 10874720]
  40. Braz J Biol. 2002 Nov;62(4B):765-74 [PMID: 12659027]
  41. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21569 [PMID: 21747940]
  42. Evolution. 1996 Dec;50(6):2158-2164 [PMID: 28565689]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0FAhabitatlevelsgeneticlosspopulationsstressvariationforestshapedevelopmentalenvironmentalmightAtlanticsizecausedfactorsassociatedtoolmonitorindicatorimpactsfragmentationstudiesexplaineduseimpactinbreedingBrazilianNeotropicalwaterremnantsdifferentinterpopulationalamountvarianceaveragehighersmallavailabilityhumanLossstabilitycanleaddeviationsbilateralsymmetryieFluctuatingAsymmetry-thoughtThereforevaluablewildservesexposuredueexaminingoftenthoughaddressedFA'sinvestigatedwhetherand/oraffectinstabilityratsampledindividualseightsiteswithinamountsavailableassessedgeometricmorphometrictechniquesusingadultmandiblesusedobservedheterozygosityHcoefficientFsevenmicrosatellitemarkersproxyindividualpopulationPopulationssignificantlyFurthermoreinterindividualdifferencesbestchanceHowevernegativelyassociationstrongerlivingareas<28%coverpresentedsuggestingtolerancethresholdworkonefirstaddressmammalbiomesuggestserveconservationnaturalanimalmessrodents'heads?InfluencemandiblefluctuatingasymmetrySouthAmericanratsSigmodontinaerainforestchangesrodents

Similar Articles

Cited By