Examining a domain-specific link between perceived control and conspiracy beliefs: a brief report in the context of COVID-19.

Ana Stojanov, Jamin Halberstadt, Jesse M Bering, Nikolina Kenig
Author Information
  1. Ana Stojanov: Department of Psychology, University of Otago, William James Building, 275 Leith Walk, Dunedin, 9016 New Zealand. ORCID
  2. Jamin Halberstadt: Department of Psychology, University of Otago, William James Building, 275 Leith Walk, Dunedin, 9016 New Zealand.
  3. Jesse M Bering: Centre for Science Communication, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  4. Nikolina Kenig: Department of Psychology, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia.

Abstract

Although anecdotal evidence suggests that control-threatening situations are associated with an increase in conspiracy beliefs, existing research does not support this "compensatory control" hypothesis. In the current study, we test a more refined hypothesis: that the link between control threat and conspiracy beliefs is , such that perceived control in a particular domain should lead to conspiracy beliefs pertaining to that domain only. Moreover, given that conspiracy beliefs are stigmatized (i.e., not socially acceptable), we propose that they should be endorsed only when other compensatory systems are frustrated. We test these ideas in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants from North Macedonia and New Zealand, who differed in perceived government effectiveness, filled in a questionnaire measuring domain-specific and domain-general perceived control, as well as domain-specific and domain-general conspiracy beliefs. As expected, domain specificity of the control threat predicted domain-specific conspiracy beliefs in the Macedonian group only. The results have implication for compensatory control theory, suggesting that the compensatory process may not always be as fluid as believed.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-021-01977-0.

Keywords

References

  1. Rev Gen Psychol. 2016;20(4):399-411 [PMID: 31680762]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):18-35 [PMID: 18605849]
  3. J Health Soc Behav. 1978 Mar;19(1):2-21 [PMID: 649936]
  4. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2017 Dec;26(6):538-542 [PMID: 29276345]
  5. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):313-8 [PMID: 22642712]
  6. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148037 [PMID: 26849361]
  7. J Health Soc Behav. 1981 Dec;22(4):337-56 [PMID: 7320473]
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Nov;99(5):725-39 [PMID: 20954784]
  9. Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):115-7 [PMID: 18832647]
  10. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 07;8(8):e71327 [PMID: 23951136]
  11. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60 [PMID: 19897823]
  12. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Feb;32(2):174-87 [PMID: 16382080]
  13. Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):443-63 [PMID: 21751999]
  14. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 17;15(8):e0237771 [PMID: 32804940]
  15. Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90 [PMID: 27942093]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0controlconspiracybeliefsperceiveddomain-specificdomaincompensatoryCOVID-19testlinkthreatcontextdomain-generalConspiracyAlthoughanecdotalevidencesuggestscontrol-threateningsituationsassociatedincreaseexistingresearchsupport"compensatorycontrol"hypothesiscurrentstudyrefinedhypothesis:particularleadpertainingMoreovergivenstigmatizediesociallyacceptableproposeendorsedsystemsfrustratedideaspandemicParticipantsNorthMacedoniaNewZealanddifferedgovernmenteffectivenessfilledquestionnairemeasuringwellexpectedspecificitypredictedMacedoniangroupresultsimplicationtheorysuggestingprocessmayalwaysfluidbelievedSupplementaryInformation:onlineversioncontainssupplementarymaterialavailable101007/s12144-021-01977-0Examiningbeliefs:briefreportCompensatorytheoriesPerceived

Similar Articles

Cited By