Native Language Similarity during Foreign Language Learning: Effects of Cognitive Strategies and Affective States.

Sayuri Hayakawa, James Bartolotti, Viorica Marian
Author Information
  1. Sayuri Hayakawa: Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
  2. James Bartolotti: University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA.
  3. Viorica Marian: Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.

Abstract

According to the US Department of State, a native English speaker can learn Spanish in about 600 h, but would take four times as long to learn Japanese. While it may be intuitive that similarity between a foreign language and a native tongue can influence the ease of acquisition, what is less obvious are the specific cognitive and emotional processes that can lead to different outcomes. Here, we explored the influence of cognitive strategies and affective states on native English speakers' ability to learn artificial foreign words that vary in their similarity to the native language. Explicit word learning strategies were reported more often, and were more effective for learners of a more similar language, and cognitive strategies were especially helpful for learners with lower moods. We conclude that language similarity, strategy, and affect dynamically interact to ultimately determine success at learning novel languages.

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90 [PMID: 19897807]
  2. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1176-90 [PMID: 24417251]
  3. Cogn Sci. 2016 May;40(4):822-47 [PMID: 26201508]
  4. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jul;31(4):729-35 [PMID: 16060776]
  5. J Mem Lang. 2000 May;42(4):481-496 [PMID: 21738287]
  6. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):940-67 [PMID: 17675598]
  7. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Apr;24(4):933-47 [PMID: 21861686]
  8. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 Jul;45(1):21-50 [PMID: 1636010]
  9. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43230 [PMID: 22916227]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 8;99(1):529-34 [PMID: 11773629]
  11. Cogn Emot. 2018 Aug;32(5):1105-1113 [PMID: 28770642]
  12. J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3): [PMID: 24403724]
  13. Lang Cogn Process. 2014;29(7):771-780 [PMID: 25018577]
  14. Lang Learn. 2010 Mar;60(1):154-193 [PMID: 21359123]
  15. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jan;28(1):29-33 [PMID: 11827085]
  16. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1121-34 [PMID: 10626367]
  17. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Jan;25(1):84-95 [PMID: 9949710]
  18. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Dec;44(6):1321-37 [PMID: 11776368]
  19. Appl Psycholinguist. 2017 Mar;38(2):427-456 [PMID: 28781397]
  20. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Dec;49(6):1175-92 [PMID: 17197489]
  21. Behav Res Methods. 2006 Nov;38(4):598-605 [PMID: 17393830]

Grants

  1. R01 HD059858/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nativelanguagecanlearnsimilaritycognitivestrategiesEnglishforeigninfluencelearninglearnersLanguageAccordingUSDepartmentStatespeakerSpanish600 htakefourtimeslongJapanesemayintuitivetongueeaseacquisitionlessobviousspecificemotionalprocessesleaddifferentoutcomesexploredaffectivestatesspeakers'abilityartificialwordsvaryExplicitwordreportedofteneffectivesimilarespeciallyhelpfullowermoodsconcludestrategyaffectdynamicallyinteractultimatelydeterminesuccessnovellanguagesNativeSimilarityForeignLearning:EffectsCognitiveStrategiesAffectiveStates

Similar Articles

Cited By