E-Learning for Undergraduate Medical Students.

Emad Tashkandi
Author Information
  1. Emad Tashkandi: Umm AlQura University, College of Medicine, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. ORCID

Abstract

PURPOSE: Disruption of education can lead to drastic changes and therefore, we need to maximize the benefits of e-technology. We aimed to explore changes in knowledge, attitudes, and challenges regarding e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and determine how e-learning has influenced academic performance.
METHODS: We conducted a self-administrated electronic survey to collect information on undergraduate medical students' e-learning. We evaluated its validity, reliability and pilot tested the instrument.
RESULTS: Between August 7 and 19, 2020, we received 995 responses. The majority of respondents answered that they knew about the tools used for e-learning, such as mobile learning, links, online classes, e-assessment; 84% (n=836), 82% (n=815), 82% (n=811) and 80% (n=796), respectively. Two-third of the respondents gained fair/very good knowledge from online classes and discussion boards; 65% (n=635), and 63% (n=620), respectively. Regarding attitudes, less than half had "somewhat" adequate knowledge and proper training; 45% (n=449) and 36% (n=361), respectively, and less than a third had "somewhat" positive feelings; 29% (n=289). The reported challenges were poor Internet speed (55%, n=545) and the lack of clinical experience and physical examination skills (51%, n=512). There is a statistical difference between the test score for the first and second semesters for year 6, year 5, year 4, and year 2 ( value < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Most respondents reported that they knew about e-learning tools and answered that they gained fair/very good amounts of knowledge accompanied by acceptable attitudes. The challenges need to be addressed to improve e-learning infrastructure. The transition to e-learning accompanied by increased academic performance.

Keywords

References

  1. In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1603-1611 [PMID: 32503818]
  2. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 29;20(1):392 [PMID: 33121488]
  3. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):777-778 [PMID: 32213335]
  4. Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1666538 [PMID: 31526248]
  5. Simul Healthc. 2018 Jun;13(3):188-194 [PMID: 29771814]
  6. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;68(7):1490-1491 [PMID: 32587212]
  7. Acta Med Port. 2020 Jun 1;33(6):446 [PMID: 32378509]
  8. JMIR Med Educ. 2020 Nov 18;6(2):e20963 [PMID: 33106227]
  9. Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):229-38 [PMID: 12769135]
  10. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 1;22(9):e19338 [PMID: 32790642]
  11. CMAJ. 2008 Jul 29;179(3):245-52 [PMID: 18663204]
  12. Acad Med. 2020 Aug;95(8):1140-1142 [PMID: 32282372]
  13. Med Educ. 2020 Sep;54(9):855-856 [PMID: 32418290]
  14. J Glob Health. 2014 Jun;4(1):010406 [PMID: 24976965]
  15. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;68(6):1220-1221 [PMID: 32461490]
  16. Med Educ. 2020 Oct;54(10):959-960 [PMID: 32403185]
  17. J Card Surg. 2020 Jun;35(6):1170-1171 [PMID: 32531127]
  18. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 14;21(2):e12913 [PMID: 30762583]
  19. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 25;8(3):e12488 [PMID: 30907743]
  20. Med Educ. 1988 Jul;22(4):345-63 [PMID: 3173164]
  21. JMIR Med Educ. 2020 Oct 9;6(2):e23604 [PMID: 32936774]
  22. Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1764740 [PMID: 32400298]
  23. Fam Med. 2002 Apr;34(4):281-6 [PMID: 12017142]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0e-learningknowledgeyearattitudeschallengesrespondentsrespectivelyeducationchangesneedCOVID-19academicperformancemedicalansweredknewtoolsonlineclassese-assessment82%gainedfair/verygoodless"somewhat"reportedaccompaniedPURPOSE:Disruptioncanleaddrasticthereforemaximizebenefitse-technologyaimedexploreregardingpandemicdetermineinfluencedMETHODS:conductedself-administratedelectronicsurveycollectinformationundergraduatestudents'evaluatedvalidityreliabilitypilottestedinstrumentRESULTS:August7192020received995responsesmajorityusedmobilelearninglinks84%n=836n=815n=81180%n=796Two-thirddiscussionboards65%n=63563%n=620Regardinghalfadequatepropertraining45%n=44936%n=361thirdpositivefeelings29%n=289poorInternetspeed55%n=545lackclinicalexperiencephysicalexaminationskills51%n=512statisticaldifferencetestscorefirstsecondsemesters6542value<005CONCLUSION:amountsacceptableaddressedimproveinfrastructuretransitionincreasedE-LearningUndergraduateMedicalStudentsmobile-learning

Similar Articles

Cited By